Comparing To His Coy Mistress by Andrew Marvell and Sonnet 138 by William Shakespeare

3034 Words7 Pages

Comparing To His Coy Mistress by Andrew Marvell and Sonnet 138 by William Shakespeare

I am comparing 'To His Coy Mistress' by Andrew Marvell (1640) and

'Sonnet 138' by William Shakespeare (1590). The similarities between

both poems are that they both use a certain amount of syllables

throughout each poem. 'To His Coy Mistress' uses 8 syllables per line,

and 'Sonnet 138' uses 10 syllables per line. Another obvious

similarity is that they both end with a couplet. They both also tell a

story. The differences in the poems are that 'To His Coy Mistress' is

arguing why they should get on with life, and Carpe diem whereas

'Sonnet 138' is telling us about how he doesn't trust her, yet he

loves her. They use different styles, because Shakespeare uses

alternate rhyming lines whereas 'To His Coy Mistress' uses couplets

most of the time. They also present different ideas. The first ('To

his Coy Mistress') gives the impression that women are shy and need

encouragement whereas 'Sonnet 138' shows that they lie and trick men.

'To His Coy Mistress' is the title of the first poem. It implies that

she is a shy mistress and it does not mean, as it does today, that she

was a secret lover and doing it deceitfully behind a man's wife's

back. It just meant his girlfriend. 'To His Coy Mistress' meant to his

shy girlfriend. The poem is a three-stage argument. It starts with the

'if' stage. If we had enough time I would spend all the ages of this

world loving you, I would spend all my time flattering you and

praising you'. The next stage is the 'but' stage. It is telling her

that we don't have all the time in the world and we are soon going to

die. The third...

... middle of paper ...

...esting to read, especially 'To His

Coy Mistress' because of the differences within the poem and because

of the way it is written like an argument. I do not find 'Sonnet 138'

beautiful but I do find it unusual because it has a strange idea that

it is all right to lie in a relationship if it makes someone happy,

because of this I find the poem offensive, as I do not believe it is

right to lie. If I received 'To His Coy Mistress' I would be both

offended and flattered, but I would have liked to have written it

because it is so clever. I don't think either poem help us to truly

understand love because one says you lie in a relationship and the

other tells us that women are shy. They contradict each other, but

this does not mean that one poem is right and one is wrong, it just

shows us two different views of love.

Open Document