Comparing The Most Dangerous Game And High Noon

705 Words2 Pages

In all great stories, even the smallest details are important, including the literary components. Some of the greatest stories of all time, including High Noon and The Most Dangerous Game use the components to make their story better. Within each component, there are endless possibilities and without them, both stories would not be the same. A lot of the components that were used make the stories very similar, but they are also very different at the same time. High Noon and The Most Dangerous Game are two different stories that share some ideas.
The settings in both stories are so much alike. "If he does, and if we ran - they'll just come after us. Four of them, and we'd be all alone on the prairie" (Foreman 293).There is only one way out of the town which is on the same train that the trouble will come from. Will Kane is stuck at a desolate town with no way to escape Frank Miller. In The Most Dangerous Game, Rainsford has a problem with his surrounding, like Kane. "This place has a reputation - a bad one" (Conell). No …show more content…

The tone is disparate in both stories. "An evil place can, so to speak, broadcast vibrations of evil" (Conell). In The Most Dangerous Game, you get a creepy feeling. You can always feel the tension along with a huge amount of suspense that leaves you on the edge of your seat. When Zaroff tells Rainsford his plans and what he is hunting, everyone is shocked, Zaroff turns into a creepy character that gives the story a unique edge. "Will, I think you ought to go while there's still time. It's better for you - and better for us" (Forman 315). In High Noon, you feel the suspense and the excitement of the underdog but the tone is mostly lonely. Kane searches for health and everyone turns him down, making him fight alone. There is a slight feeling of hope in High Noon while there is a slight eerie feeling in The Most Dangerous Game. The tones give you a large variety of feelings which makes the stories

Open Document