Comparing The Dream Of Scipio And John Salisbury's Policraticus

421 Words1 Page

Throughout the history of literature, we encounter various references to dream vision but it particularly began to flourish as a genre in the medieval ages. Medieval outlook toward dreaming involved both deep fascination and strong skepticism. Various literary texts focused on the question regarding the authenticity of the dreams which was a bit problematic to address since there was no way one could find out its true source- if it’s man-made or a divine prophecy. All these issues are addressed in the most-cited medieval age’s book, Macrobius’ commentary on the Dream of Scipio and John Salisbury’s Policraticus. Macrobius distinguishes between five types of dreams- insomnium (nightmare), visium (hallucination), somnium (enigmatic dream), oraculum (prophetic dream), and visio (visionary dream). Others such as Calcidius, Augustine, and Gregory also …show more content…

So this doubleness regarding the dreams also made the process of interpreting dreams difficult. The dream thus becomes an important way of exploring betweenness and also an instrument for examining the gray areas that bridge the terms of polar opposition (Steven F. Kruger, 65). John Salisbury also expresses important concern on the authoritative person who appears in the dreams and also the one who operates outside of it. The external interpreter also has a complicated function to perform since there are a plethora of meanings available for one single dream and it would be wrong to assign a privileged status to only one of the meanings. These commentaries by theorists influenced medieval treatments of dreaming and thus became standard reference works. Dreams were also regarded as a wish-fulfillment experience in the medieval ages. The idea of dreams as being somatic and arising from some bodily displeasure was also prevalent during the medieval

Open Document