Comparing Miller And Dollard Personality Theories

441 Words1 Page

Miller & Dollard Personality Theory Research John Dollard and Neal Miller joined in 1960, the year describing the start of the era of self-discovery and cross-disciplinary education. The result was the Dollard-Miller's psychoanalytic learning theory which continues to contribute to our modern understanding of a personality. Habit, which is the fundamental concept of the theory, is applied to represent the stable connection between response and stimuli (Dollard & Miller, 2013). In what can be termed as defining the old with new terms, the two combine the processes of drive, cue, response and reinforcement in an attempt to explain the sources and consequences of behavior. Here, it must be remembered the close correlation between behavior and …show more content…

The social role of learning is to attain the designated behavior since cues can signal the appropriate response (Dollard & Miller, 2013). Behavior can both be learned and unlearned. The presentation of cues can be done repeatedly until the expected response is obtained. Miller and Dollard applied a number of psychoanalytic concepts to explain the development of neurosis. For example, when the ego is overwhelmed, neurotic anxiety may occur after impulses from the id are kept under control and there are threats of punishment from the superego (Worchel, 2013). The Stimuli-Response model of higher mental processes also conceptualizes psychotherapy as a learning process, and hence, important in the prevention of neurosis. Rather than delving on psychosexual urges and fixations in the psychoanalytic approach the theorists extend the behaviorist approach of behavior reinforcement and crushing of frustrations via the use of powerful rewards and punishment in the society (Dollard & Miller, 2013). Punishment can be applied to shun away undesired behavior while rewards can be used to increase the frequency of wanted

Open Document