Comparing Heart Of Darkness And Things Fall Apart

1745 Words4 Pages

Heart of Darkness, by Joseph Conrad, and Things Fall Apart, by Chinua Achebe, both employ different perspectives of the African culture. In this African culture, the influence of colonialism, and the use of fear generated and paved the way the novel flowed. Heart of Darkness presents a negative view of Africa through a white man’s perspective where they somewhat fear the natives and their traditions, while Things Fall Apart presents the point of view of an African native facing the first hand effects of colonialism and fearing the changes that come with it. This is shown when Conrad presents a negative view of Africa by describing the natives as “unhuman” and “animals”. He labels the natives as vicious and portrays them as “savages”. “He was an improved specimen; he could fire up a vertical boiler. He was there below me, and, upon my word, to look at him was as edifying as seeing a dog in a parody of breeches and a feather hat, walking on his hind-legs.” (Conrad) In this passage Marlow is …show more content…

He was scared of the white men changing the Igbo culture and bringing in new religions and customs to the villages. Okonkwo was against the white man essentially coming into the Igbo village, destroying the Igbo culture and its traditions and reinstating their own. The effects of colonialism take a huge toll on Okonkwo and he is devastated because of the change that the colonist brought to the Ibo village. Okonkwo does the most cowardly thing a man can do in the Igbo tribe, which is killing himself. Okonkwo feared the change that was happening and wanted no part of it so he ended his life. While he was trying to not to become the failure and coward that his father was, he did one of the most cowardly things a man can possibly do. Since it is a disgrace for someone to commit suicide in his tribe Okonkwo would not receive a proper burial and instead would be thrown into the Evil

Open Document