I would say that both articles offer very valid points and are both true in some ways. In Slaughter’s article I can definitely understand some of the points she makes about women struggling to balance their home life with work life, because I’ve witnessed it in some ways with my own mom. However men at the same time can also deal with some of these issues as well. I will say that personally I believe Dorment is accurate when saying neither men or women have it all, the decision to become a successful parent and professional is a personal choice. Dorment does recognize some of the hardships that women have to go through when trying to be successful at their profession and as parent. For instance he brings up unfair pay discrimination and sexism
Edelman 's purpose in writing this essay is to show two sides: she wants to show the reader how her husband has abandoned her, but also cares to inform the perfect ideal of marriage that everyone grows up with is not completely achievable. Furthermore, Edelman wants the reader to feel sympathy for her situation and understand why it has taken such a toll on her life. She uses anecdotal evidence from her own life and how she handles the situations to get this point across. This choice impacts the article by creating a one sided slant because she never interviews her husband to find out how he is feeling about the situation. Edelman blames her husband for working more hours and not being around to help with the parenting, like they were supposed to be doing together. She explains how before her husband began working crazy hours, she too, was a working mother, but now the more and more hours he works, the more she needs to be present at home. Edelman says, “It began to make me spitting mad, the way the daily duties of parenting and home ownership started to rest entirely on me.” (53). She feels betrayed by her husband
The first point that Farrell makes is that out of the number of working women that have families the majority tend to choose to work jobs that have more convenient and consistent hours. On the contrary, the majority of working men with families tend to choose to work longer and more sporadic hours. To back this up, Farrell reveals a statistic from the Rochester Institute of Technology that explains the motivation of men and women in the work force.
Working women with families are often lead to inhabit several different lives all at once. In article “The Second Shift,” Arlie Hochschild discusses how women who have families and work are often subjected to having to stay a full time housewife along with their job, creating basically two sets of work, as the author calls it, the Second Shift. I think that the authors’s style of using many studies and examples helps to strengthen his points. Although he doesn’t directly express his opinion of the issue as much which weakens it to an extent but also helps to have the reader form their own opinion using the issues discussed. His use of vocabulary helps to express his opinion onto the issues discussed as it shows to be more sophisticated whenever he writes on supporting his own side of the issue. Hochschild doesn’t wait to get to the point when discussing the topics. He uses many studies and facts to help argue his points and is used efficiently, but also in a way it’s also ineffective as the lack of studies and facts that have used that would even try to support the other side of the discussion. I agree to the author's argument of how even families should continue evolving along side with the economy, to help couples to support one another as equals, rather then opposites with specific assignments.
This is supported by her quote “I believe that we can “have it all at the same time.” But not today, not with the way America’s economy and society are currently structured” (680). From this quote we can conclude that Anne-Marie Slaughter believes that both our economy and our society are to blame for women and men struggling “to combine professional success and satisfaction with a real commitment to family” (684). These struggles in our society come from the gender roles that our society puts on us when we are born. It’s assumed that women need to make sure the family life is functioning correctly, while men need to make sure that their family is financially stable. In addition to gender role assumption, many high end positions require employees to work extremely long hours in the work
Bennetts exclaims “Why do any of us accept the fact that childless women earn 10% less than their male male counterparts, or that women with children earn 27% less, or that single mothers earn up to 44% less?” (Bennetts 43), continuing to question “Can any of us defend the fact that women’s standard of living drops by 36% after divorce, whereas that of men rises by 28%?” (Bennetts 43). Edelman, on the other hand, offers her own perspective by saying “I hadn’t bargained for how deeply the gender roles of ‘nurturer’ and ‘provider’ are ingrained in us all . . . “ (Edelman 53). Gender roles, people, and society are the main oppressors of mothers in Edelman’s eyes, but Bennetts would argue that the much larger and important threat of policy must be tackled first. She uses statistics to express her disdain for the policy makers in the white house, going as far as to claim that they merely “pay lip service” (Bennetts). Bennetts again takes a broader look on the issue to explain to Edelman why the terms “‘nurturer’ and ‘provider’” (Edelman 53) seem to appear even in this increasingly feminist society. Instead of lamenting this phenomenon and blaming the people, Bennetts counters Edelman with an analysis of the problem’s root in order to find a realistic
...women’s roles in society and in the household are. It is quite interesting on how many biased readers and writers we have in this world. There are so many people so quick to label women and men based on very simplistic roles in society. Men believe women have something to prove or justify, but only in the household. Overall, I really enjoyed interpreting this short story and literary reviews by Ann Oakley and Karen Ford.
In his op-ed, “Don’t Write Men Off Just Yet,” author Nicholas D. Kristof claims that thanks to the recent academic and social advancements made by the female population in America, we are closer than ever to true gender equality in the workforce. Kristof explains that though it is true that a man earns approximately “$431,000 more than a woman on average,” (par 1) the male population does not “dominate the labor force” (par 2) as they once used to. There are many examples in which women have excelled further than men, such as making up “51 percent of professional and managerial positions in America” (par 6) or holding up as the majority of the National Honor Society, in which “64 percent of its members are girls.” (par 8). Kristof then proceeds to elaborate on this “catch-up quality” (par 10) that women seem to possess. Kristof’s writing also justifies that though women are growing progressively stronger in the workforce, society is simply enhancing itself in terms of gender equality, not embarking on “a fundamentally new imbalance in the other direction.” (par 9). This is primarily confirmed by the
Today, women are not typically seen in higher levels of position in the work force than men. In Anne-Marie Slaughter’s article “Why Women Still Can’t Have It All”, she uses her own experience to convey why it is not possible for a woman to work in a higher position, due to women being more emotional than men. People still believe it’s a women’s place to stay at home to cook, clean and take care of the children, while the men go to work to pay the bills. And it’s considered odd if the man is a stay at home father and the woman is working 24/7 and is never home. Even though it is rewarding to be able to always be there to see your child’s milestones in their life. It is always nice to get away from that life for even a moment. I don’t mean going out with the girls or guys, while you hire a babysitter, but helping your husband or wife pay the bills, so you have two rather than one income coming in at the end of the month. In Richard Dorment’s article, “Why Men Still Can’t Have It All” he states that both men and women can’t have it all. I agree with both Slaughter and Dorment, but not entirely. I believe if you want to be a good
In today’s society the relationship between one’s occupation and one’s family life is drastically different than what society viewed in the 1950’s. In the 1950’s the stereotypical family consisted of a working father and a stay at home mother (Hertz and Marshall 2001). This view has altered throughout the years, however there is still traditional stereotypes in today's society. The expectations for a dual-parent household in society today think that women should stay home and care for the kids, while the men earn the majority income in order to support the household. However since the 1950’s, Rosie the Riveter was a symbol for women’s right to work, and ever since women have been a crucial part of the working world and enjoy being productive and independent.
How in the world are you going to have it all? Is it even possible to have “it all”, the luxurious car, your dream house, a great career, and a picturesque family? Sure, but you have to pay the price of sacrificing a commitment. Women have a tough choice in between focusing in a high ended job or attending their family. But do men have the same problem? Anne-Marie Slaughter, former Director Policy Planer at the State Department and author of Why Women Still Can’t Have It All, impacted many young and elderly women with her claim. Women were in shock when Slaughter complained about her job because it took too much time away from her family. But women weren’t the only ones obstructed by this article. Why Men Still Can’t Have It All was produced by Richard Dorment, senior editor at the Esquire magazine, as a response to Slaughter’s article. Dorment complained that men also have restraints that block them from achieving “it all”. Although Slaughter believes women can’t have a balanced life and Dorment believes that men have disadvantages of having it all; I believe that Slaughter made the major points of: both men and women can’t have it all and working out a flex schedule with the workforce.
...behavior for women and perhaps to masculine. A common misconception about feminism is that women should and only stay home, watch the kids, and support the man. A common phrase would be to “keep the women in the kitchen.” Today, you can find many women getting an education, reaching higher levels beyond college, and working high paying careers and some out producing men, in this case, staying home and becoming a house wife should not be an option. Women today are not only a pretty face. With women having power in our government, control of education and big name corporations. Regardless of gender, no one should follow the influence of something that would promote people to become less than who they are. Hard work and effort would be put to waste if women today allowed themselves to just stay at home instead of doing something with themselves and for the better good.
Although the definition of masculinity and feminity hasn’t changed a whole lot from when it first originated, people in general, are adapting to the idea that it is okay to change up the roles in families and in the community. As in my first sign of masculinity in Notes from the Underground and Death of a Salesman, life now doesn’t always follow those rules. It is now okay for men and women to do whatever they want to without any restriction. Women now have full time jobs along with being a mother and house wife and there are some men that do stay home and are the primarily care taker of the children. According to National At-Home Dad posted in 2014 said that Pew Research released a report in June of 2014 that found 2 million men to be stay-at-home dads. This was double the number they reported in 1989. Unfortunately, the numbers are based entirely on unemployment, defining stay-at-home dads as “men ages 18-69 who are living with their own children (biological, step or adopted) younger than 18, not employed for pay at all in the prior year.” (no page). This statistic shows that stay at home dads are becoming more common. This is the difference in Death of a Salesman written in a time that this was almost not acceptable. According to Department for Professional Employees stated as for women with full time jobs in December 2014, there were over 73 million working women in the U.S. While
To find this balance, women have to be committed enough to their career, married to the right person who will share the responsibilities at home, and have a job that will allow them flexible hours. Slaughter writes from her position as a woman in a professional position with a family that she tries to be with more than her job allows. Slaughter specifies her argument by saying, “I am writing for my demographic- highly educated, well-off women who are privileged enough to have choices in the first place” (685). By establishing the audience she is writing for she builds the credibility of her argument. Addressing the type of person her story will apply to allows for the reader to understand that there are limitations to the argument. Although parts of the essay can be applied to all women, and not just women in professional careers, there is still suppression of the argument. Her argument is successful for the women of her demographic and can be slightly applied to other women but her argument does not address other factors that are holding back nonprivileged women. In order for her essay to be completely successful, she would have needed to discuss minimum wage, education reform, and
Before I read this article I thought I had a pretty good idea on what it was like to be a women in the work force. Sure it might be a little harder, women get paid less and might not get treated as well; but how bad could it really be? While reading I found myself want to cry, laugh and yell within this one article. This article is written like a woman is just sitting down and telling you about what its like, and it just makes the message more powerful.
The roles women typically play in the family may not always be consistent with success in the occupational arena. Staying home to care for a sick child may conflict with an important meeting (Broman 1991:511). Sometimes there has to be a change of plans when it comes to the family. Most people believe that family comes first no matter what. Men 's engagement in paid work fulfills prescriptions of hegemonic masculinity by facilitating their ability to gain status in the public sphere. A man can judge his worth by the size of a paycheck (Thebaud 2010:335). Most research shows that women are more likely to be effected by the household and men are more likely to be effected by their job. Some people feel that the goal is to reach higher on the occupational