Comparing Alexander The Great And Alexander The Killer

667 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Essays/bios om alexander the great

“Alexander Hunting for A New Past?” By Paul Cartledge and “Alexander the Killer” by Davis Hanson was created as a way to inform people about all the wrong and the right things going on in Hellenistic period. Although both article are about Alexander The Great both writer have their own perception of him. Both articles received both positive and negative responses. The Hellenistic Period was created as a force which would united all Greeks and the west of Europe like Persia, Egypt,Syria and Mesopotamia. Alexander went about handling its role as Europe's great power by establishing alliances with countries in the West in order to create a total assault on any city state if needed. Alexander III of Macedon better known as Alexander the Great. He Was born July 356 BC. Alexander became the king of Macedon after his father Philip II death. With every move he had a mission “To free the Asiatic Greeks from Persian Satraps; to provide the muscle for the lofty ideal of Panhellenism by uniting the squabbling Greeks poleis into a national federation on the mainland; to punish the …show more content…

Was he was a bloodthirsty monster obsessed with war, or romantic visionary intent on creating a multiethnic world…” (Hunt 118). Through Hanson offers many views on a lot of topics but he focuses mainly on Alexander visionary ideas. One of these ideas were why he destroyed certain city states, which started with Thebes because the refused not to join his army and opt out for independence instead (Hanson 53). Hanson commented on how a king should expand his kingdom and also prevent conflicts in doing so. He stated that a king can gain more land in his empire by using other small cities and states to help him conquer it and anyone in his way will be destroyed. Another idea Hanson focused on was theft. “… Largely the quest for personal glory and theft on continental rather than merely a provincial scale.” (Hanson

Show More
Related

  • What Are Alexander Hamilton's Political Views

    546 Words  | 2 Pages

    Alexander believed in a strong national government and he feared a weak government that the people could overthrow. If we lived in Syria or any other war-torn country right now, it would be the complete opposite because Alexander’s views are different from theirs. Though he had changed his views a few times, it seems that his final opinion was one that he truly believed in. In our country now, his

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great Influence

    1197 Words  | 3 Pages

    Alexander the great is known as one of the most ruthless and greatest leaders the world has ever seen. In less than ten years, Alexander conquered cities from Greece all the way to modern day India. Not only did he defeat and conquer cities throughout the known world, but Alexander would also leave his mark spreading and influencing Greek society wherever he went. His leadership and conquests united the East and the West as a whole like no one up to that point had done before. His impact on culture and society when meshing his Greek background with his conquered cities became something truly unique. In 323 B.C. when Alexander passed away, he not only left behind a vast thriving empire, but also a legacy that would be remembered throughout history.

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great: The Invasion Of Persia

    1091 Words  | 3 Pages

    Alexander the Great was only 20 years when his father Philip of Macedon died. Even though he was a young man, he had an unusual talent for politics and military tactics. After his father’s death, Alexander moved to continue Philip’s invasion of Persia. In the ten years of his war campaigns, Alexander conquered a large portion of the then-known world. (Judge & Langdon, 2012.)

    Read More

  • The Great Alexander: The Battle Of Alexander The Great

    994 Words  | 2 Pages

    During the reign that lasted for twelve years, Alexander conquered city after city and kingdom after kingdom, and was responsible for many events that altered the history of western civilization and the world. The inversion of his troops into Persia destroyed the Persian Kingdom, were not only motivated by personal ambitions but also revenge in Persian depredations in Greece for past

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great Dbq

    735 Words  | 2 Pages

    Have you heard of a man named Alexander the Great, the famous historical figure? There are many amazing stories about him explaining the courageous things he had accomplished. However, if you learn more about him and his accomplishments you will soon realized the real person Alexander was. Alexander the Great, ruler of his empire was in fact not great as his title states. The definition of great is a person who shows concern for others, has leadership and shows intelligence. Alexander didn’t show any of these characteristics therefore he doesn’t deserve the title of “great”.

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great: Alexander The Great

    1085 Words  | 3 Pages

    Alexander the Great (July 356BC – June 323BC) was King of the ancient Greek Kingdom of Macedon. By the age of thirty he had created one of the largest empires of the ancient world. He remained undefeated in battle and is considered one of history’s most successful Military commanders. Historians’ have offered theories which could explain Alexander’s motivation to conquer so much of the known world. Some suggest that Alexander was an idealistic visionary who sought to unite the world, whereas others argued that he was a fascist whose hunger for power drove him. The Ancient Greeks were driven by love of honour (philotimaea) and their desire for greatness. They were competitive, always striving to better one another.

    Read More

  • Was Alexander Of Macedon Really Truly Great?

    829 Words  | 2 Pages

    Alexander of Macedon, also known as Alexander the Great is one of the most well-known conquerors in history. When a historian wants to know if a ruler really was great, then he compared the ruler to Alexander, but no one really questions whether or not Alexander was truly “great.” He had many great accomplishments in his rule, but he also had numerous times where he was not the best of people. Buried beneath all of his inflated accomplishments is the hard truth that Alexander really was not all that great. He rarely showed mercy to the people that he conquered, he had little regard to the well-being of his troops, and he was very strict when it came to what religion the conquered people would follow.

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great: The Destruction Of Greece

    1043 Words  | 3 Pages

    He was only ready to lead a military. Alexander failed to expand an empire and he fell and made his empire fall with him. Not only that, but he also ruined one of the greatest kingdoms. For all of these reasons he is a villain. He had no idea what to do with his empire. All he did know was how to lead a military. Would you really want someone who only knew how to run an army, lead you? Would you want to live in a place where you and your home doesn’t matter? That’s what would happen if Alexander was your leader. Do you really want that? We can’t let this happen to us today. People like Alexander are villains, we can’t let them ruin our culture. If we let such a villainous person be such powerful person, then history will repeat itself and we will end up just like

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Diodorus And Plutarch

    833 Words  | 2 Pages

    Alexander believed he was a divine mediator for the world. In other words, he believed he was chosen by god to solely lead the world. Thus, Arrian wanted to emphasize Alexander's arrogance because he believed that he was god-like and should rule over everyone. Furthermore, after Alexander’s death, he still had extravagant plans for his empire. Alexanders wanted ridiculous projects to be completed. He wanted to build one thousand war ships to fight the Carthaginians and other African nations, and create cities and populate them with his people in Europe and Asia to expand his empire. In Diodorus’ Alexander’s Last Plans, He explains Alexander’s final wishes from a realistic standpoint. Diodorus writes, “When theses plans had been read, the Macedonians, although they applauded the name of Alexander, nevertheless saw that the projects were extravagant and decided to carry out none of those that had been mentioned.” Diodorus emphasized that Alexander believed his people should continue to follow him and his beliefs long after his death. The projects in Alexander's will spoke about were time consuming, and extravagant. Furthermore, many people did not share Alexanders beliefs of world

    Read More

  • Alexander: The Not So Great

    1861 Words  | 4 Pages

    Alexander the Great is hailed, by most historians, as “The Great Conqueror” of the world in the days of ancient Mesopotamia. “Alexander III of Macedon, better known as Alexander the Great, single-handedly changed the nature of the ancient world in little more than a decade. Alexander was born in Pella, the ancient capital of Macedonia in July 356 BCE. His parents were Philip II of Macedon and his wife Olympias. Philip was assassinated in 336 BCE and Alexander inherited a powerful yet volatile kingdom. He quickly dealt with his enemies at home and reasserted Macedonian power within Greece. He then set out to conquer the massive Persian Empire” (Web, BBC History). It is important to note, which will maybe explain his brutal actions, that Alexander was only twenty years old when he became the king of Macedonia. “When he was 13, Philip hired the Greek philosopher Aristotle to be Alexander’s personal tutor. During the next three years Aristotle gave Alexander training in rhetoric and literature and stimulated his interest in science, medicine, and philosophy, all of which became of importance in Alexander’s later life” (Web, Project of History of Macedonia). “In, 340, when Philip assembled a large Macedonian army and invaded Thrace, he left his 16 years old son with the power to rule Macedonia in his absence as regent, but as the Macedonian army advanced deep into Thrace, the Thracian tribe of Maedi bordering north-eastern Macedonia rebelled and posed a danger to the country. Alexander assembled an army, led it against the rebels, and with swift action defeated the Maedi, captured their stronghold, and renamed it after himself to Alexandropolis. Two years later in 338 BC, Philip gave his son a commanding post among the senior gener...

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great Accomplishments

    1396 Words  | 3 Pages

    Alexander the Great was born in the summer of 356 bce. As a child he was among many of the Greek philosopher Aristotle’s young pupils. He later became king of Macedon from 336 to 323 bce, he also became leader of the Corinthian League of Greek city-states. Alexander is known to the world to be one of the greatest military leaders of the ancient world. Alexander the Great has had many accomplishments in his lifetime.

    Read More

  • Alexander The Great: The Greatest Military Leader Of Alexander The Great

    1224 Words  | 3 Pages

    Alexander was no different from the rest. Not only did he made sure none of his conquered Alexandrian nations were out of line but also “Terrif[ied] the rest of Greece into obedience.” He knew that if he was not merciless and unrelenting other nations would not fear him but also put him at risk of his own nation 's rising up against him. Given his reputation, the campaigns of Alexander were not as troublesome. Egypt for example showed no hesitation nor resistance when Alexander arrived. Egypt knew that they would lose it all rather then just lose their power if they had surrendered to Alexander. For those who opposed and resisted Alexander, he went out of the way to humiliate the preexisting leader and as well as kill him whoever he wanted just to assert dominance and strike fear into those who dare challenge

    Read More

  • Alexander III: The Parallel Life: Alexander The Great

    671 Words  | 2 Pages

    Alexander III the Great, the king of Macedonia and the conqueror of the Persian Empire is one of the most known personalities from the ancient civilization. According to the primary source “The Parallel Lives” the Greek writer Plutarch 46-119 A.D., "Alexander was born early in the month Hecatombaeon, the Macedonian name for which is Loüs, on the sixth day of the month, and on this day the temple of Ephesian Artemis was burnt"(Plutarch, “The Parallel Lives” ~ 100 A.D). He was the son of the Macedonian king Fillip the second and his wife Olympia the princess of Epirus. He spent his childhood watching his father turning Macedonia into a great military nation. He attended most of the political meetings with his father, “he entertained the ambassadors from the king of Persia, in the absence of his father, and entering much into conversation with them, gained so much upon them by his affability, and the questions he asked them, which were far from being childish or trifling...“ (Plutarch, “The Parallel Lives” ~ 100 A.D). When Alexander was 13 years his father hired the great Greece philosopher Aristotle to be his tutor. Alexander said to him, “At my parents I own my life; at my teacher i own my wellfare" (Plutarch, “The Parallel Lives” ~ 100 A.D). Aristotle taught him rhetoric, literature, science and medicine which was very important to his future life.

    Read More

  • How Did Alexander The Great Influence The Contemporary World

    1449 Words  | 3 Pages

    Alexander the Great, one of the greatest and most successful generals in all of history was a brilliant, patient and often devious man that never struck without careful planning. Alexander made decisions with great speed and took astonishing risks, his success was achieved by his show of sheer force and will to overcome. During his lifetime, he defeated the Persians and Greeks, conquered Egypt and Asia Minor, and secured the Mediterranean Sea. Yes, Alexander the Great was gallant, but he was also malicious. He killed thousands while leading his men through the toughest of situations. He was a man who let no resistance go scot-free. On one hand Alexander was a man who brought great devastation, while he set free great social and cultural energy, Alexander’s legacy was left for all to see. Alexander the Great changed the world in several important ways. He brought to the Greeks a new way of fighting. He brought to the Persians the Greek way of life. Greek culture prospered in east Asia and India. He brought to everyone in his empire a view of the wide world. Three great world religions rose in the Hellenistic culture of the Near East.

    Read More

  • The Campaign of Alexander the Great

    1475 Words  | 3 Pages

    His political ideologies around civic organisation was to allow a city to continue their normal system of government but to appoint a Macedonian as the government leader to ensure he could trust them. He tried his best to minimize problems. For example, according to Hamilton, “Alexander accepted the plea of the appointed satrap of Hellespontine Phrygia, the town was apparently treated no differently from the non-Greek towns which had to pay to Alexander the tribute they had previously paid to Persia.” Another example was when he decided to swap all the cities in his empire to democracy. Alexander sent a small squadron to assist the adjustment. “These large forces suggest that resistance was expected or provided for.” Due to Egyptians and Persians religious ideals around their King, that for the Egyptians their Pharaoh was Son of Ammon, and Persians treated their King as a God, Alexander started to demand that all his subjects treat him as a God. He now started to believe that he had saved the Persians and that his new Empire was going to unite all under one ruler. Many did believe he was a God and their “bringer to light” as he was able to win and victory and he could survive wounds that would’ve killed someone else. Alexander did not himself believe this, as Plutarch says “Alexander in himself was not foolishly affected, or had the vanity to think himself really a god, but merely used his claims to divinity as a means of manifesting among other people the sense of his superiority.” This was evident in the way he carried himself differently in front of the Persians and Macedonians. Alexander exaggerated his ‘divinity’ in front of ‘barbarians’ and ‘orientals’ but down played it in front of Greeks and Macedonians as they might be of...

    Read More

More about Comparing Alexander The Great And Alexander The Killer

Open Document