Compare the way in which these poets convey their attitudes to love

1170 Words3 Pages

Compare the way in which these poets convey their attitudes to love and relationships. How is this affected by the era in which they lived? The two poems I am comparing are 'To His Coy Mistress' by Andrew Marvell. Coy can be translated into modern language as Shy. The whole poem is persuasive and is trying to get the lady to sleep with him, but because she is shy she wont. Marvell lived in the 17th century from 1621-1678. The poem in contrast is 'Sonnet 116' by William Shakespeare who also wrote this poem in the 17th century and he lived from 1564-1616. This poem is about the strength of love. Marvell was a metaphysical poet, which means he used extensive metaphors throughout his poems, as if he is playing with language. On the other hand Shakespeare wrote in sonnets and has a more sincere approach to writing. The poems are both similar in 'meaning' because love I the base of these two poems. I will be exploring the meaning, which is most difficult to find without deep thought. Marvell's poem is split into three parts, the first is speculating about love and if they had all the time this is what they would do. If they had plentiful time her shyness wouldn't matter, (but using the unique style Marvell has acquired), he is almost saying it is a crime to be shy because they have little time. He says he would spend 200 years adoring each breast and 100 years gazing upon her forehead. With all the time the world has he tells us they would visit the Indian Gange's side, because they had all the world to explore with unlimited time. Shakespeare is in contrast to this to Marvell as he is saying they have enough time to do what they like. In the opening line 'Let me not to the marriage of true minds', he ... ... middle of paper ... ...artnership ripping up their time and pleasure with 'rough strife'. Meaning they must be very fast and strong to make use of the time they have. Marvell is writing very aggressively. Shakespeare is again writing in complete opposite to Marvell, he says love does not change 'in brief hours or weeks'. Love 'bears it out even to the edge of doom' meaning love lat beyond people's lifetimes, to the ends of eternity. Shakespeare then ends and concludes his poem with a rhyming couplet. If Shakespeare's thoughts about love are false, then he says he has never written anything, therefore he cannot be wrong. Marvell then writes that they are going to be so fast that the sun will have to catch up, we see the couple hand in hand with a huge burning ball chasing them. Shakespeare is basically saying love is more powerful than time and Marvell the exact opposite.

Open Document