Compare And Contrast Ursula De Juana Ines Mauro

747 Words2 Pages

Juana Inés de la Cruz and Ursula de Jesús, two female members of the Catholic Church, transcribed their experiences suffering injustice based on either their gender or race. Although they experienced the same form of struggle, they held different positions in the eyes of society. Juana Inés de la Cruz held the position of a nun, while Ursula de Jesús was a donada, a woman who could not become a nun due to her African or indigenous descent, but instead was considered to be ‘married’ to Christ instead of becoming a wife and living a traditional lifestyle. Both women, however, faced oppression throughout their lives, and this common disadvantage drove them both to similar conclusions and solutions about the hierarchies of the religious order of …show more content…

To de Jesús, in death everyone was equal and the only difference at that point was the quality of their actions in life, determining the amount of time they spent in Purgatory. She did wonder, however, if black women could go to heaven, so although she was very progressive in her thinking, deep seated racial factors still affected her view of religious hierarchy. Throughout the text, she often converses with holy voices in her head, and at one point asks, “Remember me, Lord? I am the little slave of my mother, Saint Claire” (Souls 133), to which the voices respond, “The more you lower your head, the more you can ascend” (133). In this interaction, the voices tell de Jesús that her status as a slave does not matter in the kingdom of God, but her devotion and faith will determine her position in heaven. While de Jesús wrote about equality in death, Juana Inés de la Cruz discussed the inequalities that women were forced to suffer under in …show more content…

De la Cruz talks about the female gender role numerous times in her writing, giving one example from the words of Paul straight from the bible, “Women should remain silent in the churches. They are not allowed to speak, but must be in submission, as the law says” (1 Corinthians 14:34, New International Version) . She then explains that, “He finally decides, in his judicious way, that to lecture publicly in the classroom and to preach in the pulpit are not legitimate activities for women, but that studying, writing, and teaching privately are not only allowable but most edifying and useful” (Sor Juana 229). This ancient way of thinking is ingrained so deeply in the culture, that even in making her point to prove more women should be well educated, she cites a blatantly sexist excerpt from the Bible. De la Cruz then breaks away from the strictly religious to discuss the lack of educated females in their society, stating that, “All of this would be eliminated if there were older women of learning … and instruction were passed down from one group to another” (233). De la Cruz’s writing aims to bring to light that ignoring the taboo of educating women could be the only way to break the oppressive cycle, and allow equally educated genders to become the

Open Document