Compare And Contrast Of Human Idealism

759 Words2 Pages

Compare and Contrast of Human Idealism Between two readings, Analects and the Basic Writings of Mo Tzu, Hsün Tzu, and Han Fei Tzu. Both have a different perspective, but both strive to make humankind the best as they can. Forming a personality that we as human needs to shape ourselves to develop the ideal person. The Analects contain fragment and random sequence of Confucius sayings that reflects upon notes that contains discipline from collective teachings. Han Feizi was part of the Han royal family, he was taught by a Confucian teacher Xunzi. He was not into Confucianism, but more concerning with governmental policies. Therefore, both Confucius and Han Feizi have their own idea of what they want to see, but they both have similar aspects
In "Book I, 8" Confucius stated that "If a gentleman is frivolous, he will lose the respect of his inferiors and lack firm ground, upon which to build up his education...And if he finds he has made a mistake, then he must not be afraid of admitting the fact and amending his ways." Confucius stated again “...Both small matters and great depend upon it. If things go amiss, he who knows the harmony will be able to attune them. But if harmony itself is not modulated by ritual, things will still go amiss” (Analects I.12, 86). The person should be able to change their ways for them to continue on their life, a person who doesn 't know wrong, then there is no point for others to respect them or act the same towards the person. A person must learn from their mistakes and correct their error to be able to develop goal-oriented and their way of ritual tradition. We learn from trial and error, that 's how we are able to expand our knowledge on specific topics. Giving the ability to become open to opportunities and learn not just from parents, but also from

Open Document