Compare And Contrast Left For Dead And To Build A Fire

548 Words2 Pages

The short story “ To Build a Fire” and the excerpt from “Left for Dead” demonstrates naturalisms in many ways. For example the behavior of each character showed how deadly nature is. The unnamed man in ¨To Build a Fire” attitude towards nature was very ignorant. He didn't acknowledge how cold it was ultimately killing him. Since he didn't pay attention to nature he wasn't as prepared as much as he should have been. He only brought one meal making it very dangerous if he gets lost and needs to find more food. He didnt take the old man's advice and travel with a partner with such cold conditions. Also he could have wore more to keep warm and brought more supplies in case of an emergency. On the other hand Beck Weathers always noticed the dangers of nature. Beck Weathers loves hiking but he also does extensive research on the mountains he climbs. The reason why Beck was able to survive was because how well he knows nature. He was able to survive a storm that came out of nowhere on his own by climbing down to the last camp he was at and burrowing into the ground and using his coat to keep him warm. Beck was very prepared for the forces of nature with his jumpsuit and supplies which …show more content…

The unnamed man was smart but also an idiot. He was given advice and was too stubborn to take it. If he just acknowledge how cold it was and prepared accordingly he could have survived. Darwin's theory tells us that the man wasn't fit enough to survive because he wasn't able to make the proper decision of preparing for the worst. With Beck Weathers it's the complete opposite, he survived because he was strong enough too. Beck Weathers had the right attributes to survive including reminiscing over the dangers of the cold. Darwin's theory of evolution states that the organisms with the right gens survive and the organisms with wrong ones die because they aren't adapted the the environment. Beck weathers adapted; the unnamed man

Open Document