Compare And Contrast A River Runs Through It 'And Desert Solitaire'

1451 Words3 Pages

Not all the things and facts seen on the surface correspond to the message of the book! This is a law that should be always kept in mind in order to get the right understanding of the author’s thoughts, especially in terms of non-fiction. The writings “A river runs through it” written by Norman Maclean and “Desert solitaire” by Edward Abbey are bright examples of such phenomenon. On the surface they seem to depict one definite thing whether it is fly-fishing or description of wilderness but both posses the depth of the human soul and its conflicts which may result in isolation or even violence. The story “A river runs through it” written by Norman Maclean is actually a story about his brother Paul and fishing. The story has a semi-biographical character. It is a story of a special bond between two brothers which becomes their joy and their curse. “A river runs through it” is a story of two boys, Paul and Norman - two brothers growing up in a family of a Presbyterian minister. Norman is a “metronome” having the same “rhythm” as his father had. Paul is a walking rebel, he opposes everything his father teaches him and tries to find a new way of ding everything. Nevertheless he …show more content…

The rest of the time they were “alone” and could not speak to each other. Paul was so lonely inside, so isolated from the actual life. His childhood rebel was delayed and converted into an inner psychological conflict. Even when Norman was extremely worried about Paul, he just could not find the right words…They just went fishing! And this was the moment when isolation for a short time converted into a family reunion. In his story, Norman Maclean writes that they two brothers “had to be very careful in dealing with each other” and emphasized the fact that Paul “…did not want any big brother advice or money or help, and, in the end, I [Norman] could not help him” (Maclean

Open Document