Coleman's Argument: Climate Change Skeptic

356 Words1 Page

In my refutation paper, I argue against the outlandish opinion of a meteorologist and self-proclaimed, “Climate Change Skeptic”. In his arguments, he attacks the validity of opposing viewpoints, questions the accuracy of data, as well as offers his own theories as to why certain phenomenons exist. This refutation paper is well-written because it breaks down Coleman’s arguments in a reasonable and organized way and then offers different forms of refutations. In the intro paragraph, a thesis is given and the main points of the essay are laid out. From there, I begin each paragraph, stating the main idea, offering Coleman’s opinion, then refuting it in one of a few ways. Because of this various use of refutation styles, clear layout, and simple

Open Document