Climate Change Social Justice

1192 Words3 Pages

In my own view, writing about social and environmental justice is futile unless authors make an effort to provide creative and constructive solutions that can be adopted by readers. Karl Marx (CITE) once said that “the philosophers have only interpreted the world in various ways; the point is to change it.” By offering such strategies in this chapter, we move one step closer to making climate change adaptation a reality. So far, this study has contributed to the examination of climate change in a myriad of ways. First, the argument is made that climate change must be regarded as an issue of social justice if it is to gain any traction as a social movement. Next, we reviewed the current state of governmental and environmental action within Alberta. …show more content…

First, we can deal with climate change through adaptation and mitigation strategies before it spirals out of control– or instead, we can continue to communicate about the issue in the same old ways, deferring its impacts until we reach a point where runaway climate change will become too severe and can no longer be overlooked. This is a social justice issue that boils down to the simple ‘frog in the hot water’ scenario. At the moment, we find ourselves at the tipping point where policies enacted today have the ability to make or break the future climate. Without taking action, we will have to be prepared to witness more of what happened in Fort McMurray? The problem is that a future that is both environmentally and socially just cannot be achieved by approaching environmental issues with the same set of problem solving strategies. Only when the mainstream media acquiesce to the demands for democratic modes coverage can the environmental movement be successfully communicated to the …show more content…

Hence, both political pragmatism and normative arguments suggests, “the future world is unavoidably dependent on the degree to which the public is engaged on the issue of climate change” (Moser 2008; see also Halpern and Bates 2004). In a newspaper like the Calgary Herald, a paper that does not offer a decentralized public-sphere or democratic participation; readers do not receive exposure to the diverse perspectives that foster mutual learning and reflexivity on the issue of climate change (Lorenzoni et al., 2007, p. 67). Therefore, the amount of the Herald’s pro-industry frames will likely warp a reader’s understanding of climate change. Arguably, Calgary is not being served by a trustworthy media source when the paper inhibits participants from shaping and supporting the issue as well as making their voices and values heard (Moser p.169). Advocates for a post-carbon future are left to fight against well-funded politicians who lobby for the interest of big oil and the general economic and social status quo. As has been uncovered through the critical discourse analysis, pro-environment frames do not resonate with the ideologies and values embraced by the Herald and the vast majority of Albertans. Resultantly, the Herald acting as gatekeepers shut out coverage and the success of their backgrounding and omitting tactics must not be

Open Document