Climate Change: A Rhetorical Analysis

1412 Words3 Pages

Climate Change has become an incredibly controversial topic because of the bid to win votes. As with any successful political party, capital and supporters are needed to fund and support campaigns and activities to secure votes. The Democratic and Republican parties have taken opposite sides of the ring regardless of scientific proof. In relation to global warming, the Democrats represent the environmentalists in the green corner and the Republicans represent the current energy tycoons in the red corner. The two opposing parties are simply trying to one up each other with each rhetorical combination thrown. The more irrational or misconstrued the rhetoric, the more the crowd rooting for each fighter reacts and the more independents rally to …show more content…

Arrhenius estimated using the greenhouse gas effect theory, that if the total amount of the carbon dioxide concentration in the atmosphere were cut in half the surface temperature of the Earth would decrease and if the opposite occurred and the carbon dioxide concentration doubled the temperature of the surface would in turn increase. His ideas remained under high scrutiny because of conflicting ideas that were successfully debunked in the1980s. In 1987, Stephen Schneider predicted that the Earth would warm at an exponential rate due to increased carbon dioxide emissions facilitated by humans. The majority of scientists agreed with his predictions and today his estimations are relatively close (Enzler). However, today many scientists are still disputing the effects global warming will have on the world and with good reason. On one hand, some theorists believe global warming is a catastrophic world event in which the Earth will become uninhabitable for life in a rather short period of time, between one to three hundred years (Edwards). On the other hand, the Earth will simply experience changes in its climates that cause increased strain on ecosystems and certain regions, which must adapt to their new climate for sustenance. Overall, the severity of the implications global warming presents has yet to be settled by scientists. This can be attributed to the fact that weather can be an incredibly complex entity to predict and climate is directly derived from all of the weather a region

Open Document