Clarence Thomas Theory

1601 Words4 Pages

What was the Anita Hill and Clarence Thomas hearing? What is black feminism and how did it play a role in the hearing of Anita Hill and Clarence Thomas. This research paper will explain the problem of how black feminism played a role in the Anita Hill vs Clarence Thomas hearing. Intersectionality is the first theory I have chosen to help explain the problem. The next theory that will explain the problem of how black feminism played a role in the Anita Hill vs Clarence Thomas hearing, will be third wave feminism. To begin, with we must learn who Anita Hill and Clarence Thomas are. Anita Hill was born in Oklahoma in 1956 and excelled in her studies, gaining admission to Yale Law School and was one of the only black students in her class. Anita …show more content…

The public watched as she restated her allegations of sexual harassment from Thomas. The hearing started with an opening statement from Joseph R. Biden Jr saying “Today, the senate judiciary committee is meeting to hear evidence on sexual harassment charges that have been made against Judge Clarence Thomas, who has been nominated to be an Associate justice of the supreme court. I want to speak very briefly about the circumstance that have caused us to convene these hearings. We are here today to hold open hearings on Professor Anita Hill allegations concerning judge Thomas. This committee handling of her charges has been criticized, Professor Hill made two request to this committee: First, she asked us to investigate the charges against Judge Thomas, and, second, she asked that these charges remain confidential, that they not be made public and not shared with anyone beyond this committee. I believe we have honored both of those request” (United States., & Miller, A. (1994). The complete transcripts of the Clarence Thomas--Anita Hill hearings: October 11, 12, 13, 1991). Many people felt as if the opining statement as if the opening statement was natural and showed no bias to either side, but as the hearing went on the senate showed their true …show more content…

The end of Anita Hill opening statement was powerful but left room for the senate to question her as a person, “It is only after a great deal of agonizing consideration that I am able to talk of these unpleasant matters to anyone except my closest friends. As I've said before these last few days have been very trying and very hard for me and it hasn't just been the last few days this week. It has actually been over a month now that I have been under the strain of this issue. Telling the world is the most difficult experience of my life, but it is very close to having to live through the experience that occasion this meeting. I may have used poor judgment early on in my relationship with this issue. I was aware, however, that telling at any point in my career could adversely affect my future career. And I did not want early on to burn all the bridges to the EEOC. As I said, I may have used poor judgment. Perhaps I should have taken angry or even militant steps, both when I was in the agency, or after I left it. But I must confess to the world that the course that I took seemed the better as well as the easier approach. I declined any comment to newspapers, but later when Senate staff asked me about these matters I felt I had a duty to report. I have no personal vendetta against Clarence Thomas. I seek only to provide the committee with

Open Document