Civil Disobedience Rhetorical Analysis Essay

820 Words2 Pages

Henry David Thoreau, well known for his work Civil Disobedience, discusses and argues for a sustainable government for the American populace. The motto: “That government is best which governs least” (part 1, paragraph 1) carries on and supports several claims Thoreau makes throughout his essay. His response states: “I ask for, not at once no government, but at once a better government. Let every man make known what kind of government would command his respect…” (part 1, paragraph 1) which strengthens Thoreau’s point of view about the American government and the type of government he desires. Thoreau also applies figurative language and central ideas to make his points strong, convincing, and engaging toward the reader about a “better government”.
This implies that the American populace blindly follow the government without realizing the negativity of its structure Thoreau addresses throughout his essay. Because of this, Thoreau “… quietly declare[s] war with the State, after [his] fashion, though [he] will still make what use and get advantage of her [he] can, as is usual in such cases.” (part 3, paragraph 9). The phrase “quietly declaring war” implies that Thoreau creates a gap between himself and the government. Thoreau concludes his essay by adding: “There will never be a really free and enlightened State until the State comes to recognize the individual as a higher and independent power, from which all its own power and authority are derived, and treats him accordingly.” (part 3, paragraph 19), which indicates that a “better government” under Thoreau’s point of view, should acknowledge the people in order to maintain stability in the government. Throughout Civil Disobedience, Thoreau imposes a “better government” due to the American government’s imperfection. Thoreau’s statement: “That government is best which governs not at all” is supported by his observation of the American government and provides

Open Document