Civil Disobedience Rhetorical Analysis

1669 Words4 Pages

Civil Disobedience by Henry David Thoreau was one of the most important pieces of literature written in the mid-1800’s. This essay was written to argue against government intervention and that the people should take more responsibility and only support a government that pushes forward ideals that the general public supports. What marks Civil Disobedience as part of its time is its rejection of governmental control and favors individual liberty during the heart of the slavery debate. This essay was written at a time when the issue of slavery was at the forefront of American culture. Americans all across the country were debating whether or not that slavery was good for the future of the United States. Thoreau in this essay strongly opposes the slavery that is currently going on in the United States. This time period in American history had Americans debating whether the idea of slavery was moral, as they were starting to hear more stories of those who …show more content…

He points to political conventions that the major political parties hold, that they almost always consist of politicians and politicians alone. There is very little influence from the working class in this process and they only are able to get a say once it comes down to a general election. Thoreau argues that there a large amount of reputable individuals who do not get a say that he believes should get a say because they are just as able as those who are ultimately in charge of the political process. The lack of communication between the parties and the citizenry led to the creation of smaller political parties during the 1840s and 1850s as individuals were looking for political parties that would serve their interests as opposed to just serving the interest of the elite (Rose 36-37). Thoreau’s essay discusses the need for changes in the political system towards one where there is more inclusion in the process for those outside of the

Open Document