Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Henry David Thoreau and civil disobedience
Henry David Thoreau and civil disobedience
Henry David Thoreau and civil disobedience
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Henry David Thoreau and civil disobedience
Civil disobedience has been around for a long time. In Bible times Christians would disobey laws that would go against their beliefs, such as the law that they couldn’t preach. (Acts 4) Christians still disobey laws in many countries that do not let them practice their faith, some end up in jail or killed. In the past in this country, Thoreau wrote an essay on Civil disobedience saying that people make the law and have a right to disobey unjust laws, to try and get those laws changed. Under British rule in India, the British were harshly oppressive and only interested in exploiting products from India for their own use, causing many Indians to become extremely poor. They became so oppressed they were on the verge of violent civil disobedience, when Gandhi appeared to negotiate with the British threw non-violent tactics such as sit-ins and hunger strikes. The people were supportive on Gandhi and were set to become violent if anything happened to him. Things were resolved without violence. In New York during the 1940’s a non-violent act of civil disobedience occurred among blacks to protest segregation laws. Blacks were not allowed to live in white neighborhoods, had to ride in the back of buses, lived in poverty with poor schools, and were frequently beaten by police. A few years after this the civil rights movement with Martin Luther King, who used non-violent means such as sit-ins, boycotts, and speeches to obtain equal rights for African-Americans. Sometimes civil disobedience can become violent as in the case in South Africa during the struggle to end apartied. It started out with passive resistance, but after years of struggling with no change, a violent group was formed and was willing to do anything to get the freedom they desired. In recent years the issue of abortion has sparked some civil disobedience in an effort to repeal the laws allowing abortion, by using sit-ins, prayer, etc. outside of the clinics. Some within this group feel they have the right to use any means necessary to stop the killing on unborn children by attacking Dr’s who perform abortions or bombing a clinic. They feel that a violent approach is the only way to solve a problem. Also, when emotions are running high the potential for violence increases. In Kohlbergs moral stages five & six people begin to understand morals and social good then moral reasoning. Basic human rights become important as well as principles.
There are times throughout the history of the United States when its citizens have felt the need to revolt against the government. There were such cases during the time of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Henry David Thoreau, when there was unfair discrimination against the Afro-American community and Americans refusing to pay poll taxes to support the Mexican War. They used civil disobedience to eventually get legislation to stop the injustice brought against them and their nation. Civil disobedience is defined as refusal to obey civil laws or decrees, which usually takes the form of passive resistance. People practicing civil disobedience break a law because they consider the law unjust, and want to call attention to its injustice, hoping to bring about its withdrawal.
Thoreau believed that when people disobey unjust laws, that will help change the laws to make them just...
Civil Disobedience occurs when an individual or group of people are in violation of the law rather than a refusal of the system as a whole. There is evidence of civil disobedience dating back to the era after Jesus was born. Jesus followers broke the laws that went against their faith. An example of this is in Acts 4:19-20,”God told the church to preach the gospel, so they defied orders to keep quiet about Jesus,” In my opinion civil disobedience will always be needed in the world. The ability to identify with yourself and knowing right from wrong helps to explain my opinion. Often in society when civil
Civil disobedience is the refusal to obey certain laws, but in a peaceful form of political protests. Martin Luther King Jr. is the best example of a form of civil disobedience for the Civil rights Movement and many more through the late 1950s to the late 1960s. ‘’Martin Luther King Jr. used the power of words and acts of nonviolent resistance, such as protest, grassroots organizing, and civil disobedience.’’
(An analysis of how Civil Disobedience by Henry David Thoreau has impacted people through time.)
If one were to follow the beliefs that Henry David Thoreau expresses in “Civil Disobedience,” one wouldn’t be living a life without conflict. Thoreau wrote various works that deeply affected the society around him during his time, and these works continue to leave a lasting impression on those who read them today. His ideas challenge readers and provide insight into a world of self reliance, interacting with nature, and venturing into a place of solitude. Nevertheless, sometimes an easy tendency arises in which one places Thoreau on a pedestal and only takes Thoreau’s works at face value when the work itself may contain fallacies. Thoreau’s literary work of “Civil Disobedience” remains highly regarded in society; however, his work contradicts
Civil disobedience is in the nature of all human beings. While some may not show it all, the will to enact civil disobedience kindles when the oppressed have been oppressed for too long. In the circumstance of religious oppression, it is justified to enact civil disobedience for the sake of freedom.
Some of the most influential acts of civil disobedience in the United States occurred in response to segregation during the 1960’s. Led by Martin Luther King Jr. the civil rights movement of the 60’s opposed the Jim Crow laws in a non-violent a manner. Though violence wasn’t used the sit-ins and other forms of protest were illegal and led to the arrest of Martin Luther King Jr. and other protesters “their willingness to suffer and their amazing discipline in the midst of great provocation. One day the South will recognize
Gandhi was peacefully assembling and advocated for the people of India to help gain their independence from Great Britain. You may wonder, what was the outcome of his nonviolent approach? I’ll tell you that his actions are what gained equality amongst people in India and respect for all of their social classes, as well gaining India independence from Great Britain. All just from his non-violent approach! Not surprisingly, Gandhi’s practices were the great inspiration for Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. King saw the importance of marches and non-violent
Throughout our history, this country has witnessed numerous instances of civil disobedience and violent attacks towards our government. In order to fully comprehend the differences between the two, civil disobedience is boycotting and refusing to comply with laws or demands by the government. While, direct attacks could be riots or domestic terrorism. Civil disobedience generally is legal if people don’t block roads, demolish any property, or result in violence towards others. Usually riots and domestic terrorist attacks will cause: damage to personal and private properties, injuries, or even deaths.
In fact you could say that this movement started at the birth of this nation and continues today. This movement was also known as the Civil Rights Movement. At first, African Americans would hold series of silence protests and marches with intentions of civil disobedience. The act of positive influence took a turn when physical violence was added. Racial violence, including hosing down and beating protesters. It no longer was civil and brought a negative consequence into society. As Martin Luther King Jr. stated in his I Have a Dream speech, “We must not allow our creative protest to degenerate into physical violence. Again and again, we must rise to the majestic heights of meeting physical force with soul force.” King was aware of the impact of physical violence and the negative significance it had on society. Not only did the word civil get taken out of civil disobedience, the violence will forever be
With the world that we live in, civil disobedience is an essential method for solving the conflict that is bound to arise. As man lives beside man, dissent is inevitable and clashing viewpoints can very easily become wild dispute. Additionally, these differences may morph or come into being as time passes, and when this happens it is usually necessary for the government to somehow intervene to elude potential disaster. Formulating these laws, though, is not usually a simple process and there are always complications that must be worked out before a solution can be settled upon. For this reason, civil disobedience is essential to society as it gives the possibility for obstacles to be worked out without any other major conflict—no bloodshed or loss of lives is necessary. For example, the 1960s Civil Rights
Dating back as long as history started, there have been disagreements and people fighting for what they believe in. In the United States, civil disobedience can go back to 125 years ago in 1893, involving Gandhi’s first real protest with Native American rights. Small actions that started with someone like Gandhi have shaped America and many other countries into our nations that we have today and the laws that are in place. Civil disobedience can be described as the refusal to comply with certain laws or to pay taxes and fines, as a peaceful form of political protest. One major action of Civil Disobedience of course dealt with the civil rights movement in the 1950s through the 1960s. One that has currently come into light
While Civil disobedience (CD) is the act of opposing a law that an individual may not agree with but peacefully deciding to disobey it, it could have both some positive and negative effects on a free society. I would like to elaborate on both aspects because CD is a reality that I have seen practiced on numerous occasions in the past year. In society’s current condition of heightened free speech rather the message be love or hate, it has impacted humanity in a harsh way that inevitably feels as if recovery will be a long stretch ahead. Through protests, violence, hate and love speech, riots, acts of terrorism, and many more to name, I have seen instances where those who practiced peaceful resistance were still treated as if they had done a violent crime. As long as peaceful resistance is tolerated across the board being inclusive of all humanity with no ill effects, I believe that in return more
Throughout history there has been many incidences that civil disobedience has occurred. From the Boston Tea Party to the Civil Rights Movement. With these non violent demonstrations people had more say in the government creating communication, so better decisions could be made. During the Boston Tea Party the American colonies