Civil Disobedience Rhetorical Analysis

573 Words2 Pages

“Civil Disobedience” follows Henry Thoreau’s ideology as to what he believes is “a better government”. Throughout the text Thoreau develops multiple central ideas such as ethics and the relationship between the individual and the state to back up his claims and thoughts. Thoreau points and calls out the governments behavior towards its people and its unjust actions. Thoreau believes that “a better government” is one that maintains a mutual relationship with its people and treats them as independent individuals. The relationship between the individual and the state is a central idea that is consistently used throughout the text in order to convey Thoreau’s points about what he believes to be “a better government”. Thoreau views the government as oppressive, abusive, and ineffective. He states that the government is unintentionally causing unnecessary problems for the people and calls them “those mischievous persons who put obstructions on the railroads.” Thoreau states multiple times about how the state abuses its power and …show more content…

He develops ethics by elaborating on the people inability to determine what is right and what is wrong, due to them blindly following whatever the government does. Thoreau heavily believes that each person should have their own conscience and he stresses this throughout the text. Those who use their conscience and are capable of determining what is morally right or wrong are considered a threat to the state since they are aware of the governments wrong doings and the government has no control over them. The people know that there are flaws within the government and some of the things they do are unjust and oppressive, however they have no call to action and decide not to do anything about it. For this reason, after his night in jail Thoreau distances himself from the people and looks down upon their

Open Document