City Space, Technology, Popular Culture

1298 Words3 Pages

This dream of unity seemed especially urgent in the United States in the early decades of this century, when the destruction of traditional rural societies, the relocation of large numbers of people into industrial belts, and foreign immigration […] brought together vastly different population groups. […] And yet, in its depiction of the urban milieu, Manhatta seems intent on exorcizing heterogeneity in favor of a uniformity reminiscent of the flatness and geometry of skyscraper architecture. (Suárez, City Space, Technology, Popular Culture.)

The inhabitants of Manhattan were vastly diverse, and each contributing to and benefitting from industrialisation in their own way. New factories and apartment buildings couldn’t have existed without the labourers to build them and the workers to employ. While Manhatta sees the city as lacking an ecosystem, it is arguably the human inhabitants of Manhattan that are the ecosystem: “a biological community of interacting organisms and their physical environment.” (Oxford Dictionaries)

Considering the humans of the city, in particular the large majority that were workers or seeking work, in an ecological context, as the source of diversity and capital in an industrialised age, brings to the fore questions of how the human ecology was to be …show more content…

Smoke blurs harsh boundaries and sharp lines, “soften[ing] the geometricized cityscape.” (Lucic, 53) Clouds of smoke and steam tiptoe the line between the organic and the machine. At around the four minute mark of the film, aerial shots look down upon city rooftops letting out long, continuous white trails, at times filling the entire field of view with their haze. It is as though the buildings are breathing, and while the absence of ecology from Manhatta has been noted the smoke creates ambiguity, a sense of something organic existing within the towers of steel and

Open Document