Analysis Of The South Bronx

2346 Words5 Pages

Brittany Lowman
May 8, 2014
HIST380E
Title—subtitle
The South Bronx, New York City: another northern portrait of racial divide that naturally occurred in the span of less than a century, or a gradual, but systematic reformation based on the mistaken ideology of white supremacy? A quick glance through contemporary articles on The Bronx borough convey a continuation of less-than-ideal conditions, though recently politicians and city planners have begun to take a renewed interest in revitalizing the Bronx. (HU, NYT) Some common conceptions of the Bronx remain less than satisfactory—indeed, some will still express fear or disgust, while some others have expressed the fundamentally incorrect racial ideas studied here—but others recall the Bronx with fondness, calling it a once “boring” and “secure” neighborhood.(BRONX HIST JOURNAL, p. 1) What are we to do with such radically different accounts between The Bronx of yesterday, and the impoverished borough of today? If we speak in known, contemporary cultural stereotypes, then segregation is strictly a Southern design, but natural otherwise—but to record this as a natural occurrence, no different than a seasonal change or day turning to night, would be to ignore the underlying problem. The changing role of white Americans from majority to population minority in the Bronx, coupled with the borough’s title of “poorest urban county in America” (as of 2012), is the result of careful orchestration and a repeating story of economic and political gain superseding civil rights. (GONZALES, BRONX) (BRONX HIST JOURN, HARD KNOCKS IN BRONX @ poorest note ) It is not coincidence.
Noticing the influx of immigration and population boom in Manhattan at the end of the 19th century, a man named J. Clarence...

... middle of paper ...

... it effectively locked African Americans and Latinos into the poorly-kept and badly outdated rental properties.
Repeatedly, politicians, activists, landlords and even many of the residents themselves echoed the sentiment that nothing in the South Bronx mattered: it became “an area not worth saving.” The Charlotte Street that once represented promise as long as the family worked hard had crumbled, becoming just another target for planned arson. Most arson plans spread by word of mouth in the hopes that the fires would hit only buildings themselves, yet not everyone escaped the flames unscathed. Using a 1982 interview with Charles Lefkowitz on the subject of fire victims, Jonnes quotes, “One kid caught in it was a crispy critter by the time we got to him. The other two were badly burnt.”
TALK ABOUT WHY THE SHIFT TO BURNING. PAID ARSONISTS. YOUTH. CHARLOTTE STREET.

Open Document