Childhood Arrivals: DACA Policy Analysis

1977 Words4 Pages

The Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, commonly referred to as DACA, was implemented in June of 2015, by President Barack Obama. The program allows children who entered the United States illegally to remain here for two years and may be submitted for possible renewal at the end of their two-year term. However, it includes certain prerequisites that the child must meet. For example, they must have entered the country before the age of sixteen and remained in the United States for the previous five years. They must also either be currently enrolled in school, graduated, or pursuing an educational certificate. An honorably discharged veteran also qualifies for the program. On top of the other requirements, the individual cannot have committed …show more content…

The goal was to push congress to address the immigration issue. However, from a political standpoint, it was never in the president’s power to actually implement a program like DACA. The issues surrounding DACA came to light when Donald Trump took office because one of his biggest goals is to enforce a stricter immigration policy, beginning with his infamous ‘wall’ idea. Trump and his administration made the decision to revoke DACA’s status. Since this decision was announced, there has been a storm of emotion on both sides of the argument. Some think DACA should be revoked completely, leaving the current recipients in fear. Some believe it should be discontinued but those already impacted by it should be allowed to continue under its benefits. Others feel that it should be continued in the same fashion as it already has been. Some even think that the people with DACAs should be granted citizenship. The main questions that are highly debated within our government are one, does the DACA program conflict with the Constitution, and two, what are we supposed to do about the 800,000 people that currently qualify for the …show more content…

Some refer to America as hypocritical because it was founded through foreigners, yet now the government has a tendency to turn their backs on them. Many feel it is unfair and unethical to send children brought here illegally by their parents back to a country they do not know. Most were brought here too early in their life to even remember ever being anywhere else. The Dreamers have made friends here, gone to school here, held jobs here, and some have started families here. They look at America as their home, just the same as any natively born citizen does. Some say they feel as though they have no sense of home anymore. It isn’t here because they constantly are under attack and scrutiny. A home is a safe place and they don’t feel safe here anymore because they no longer know what to expect day to day. On the other hand, home is not in their native country because they literally have no connection or ties to that country anymore and many never lived their lives there. Everything they know and love is here and if they are willing to follow our laws, serve in our military, and work under legal conditions, then who are we to tell them they don’t belong here? It is inhumane in the purest sense to rip people’s lives out from under them when they had no control over these circumstances to begin with (Abrego,

More about Childhood Arrivals: DACA Policy Analysis

Open Document