Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Federalist no 10 essay
Jefferson's vision of america
Federalist no 10 essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Federalist no 10 essay
Goodsell’s New Vision: Reduce, Reuse, Recycle The call to public service cannot be answered by one who lacks a direction, a focus, or a clearly articulated goal: a “vision.” Charles Goodsell discusses the idea of vision at length in his article, A New Vision for Public Administration, but falls short of granting the “new” vision we are promised, giving us little more than fodder for a strategic planning session and recycled ideas from our nation’s founders. The “vision” for the discussion herein is to dismantle Goodsell’s “New Vision” by reducing those ideas into manageable moving parts, identifying the ideas that have been reused, and recycling those pieces that are redundant to the current system. It cannot go without mention that Goodsell’s …show more content…
He contends that “[public] administration’s contribution to public trust tends to be invisible because most of its contribution is at a routine or below-the-surface-level” (2006, Pg. 633). Is it the role of the public to recognize the contributions of public administrators or is it better that public administrators be those who are behind the scenes, working tirelessly for the common good? Thomas Jefferson said “in a virtuous government, public offices are what they should be: burdens to those appointed to them […] foreseen to bring with them intense labor and great private loss” (as cited in Light, 2011, pg. s10). Charles Goodsell’s New Vision for Public Administration is one which has been idealized since the signing of the constitution. He draws greatly from the utopia of government envisioned by Thomas Jefferson and other framers. What he presents to us is a repackaged version of the current system, and the dream of an era of public trust in government. Perhaps the “new vision” of public administration is one in which the public has their eyes closed. Goodsell, C. (2006). A New Vision for Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 66(4), 623-635. Light, P. (2011). Federalist No. 1: How would Publius define good government today? Public Administration Review, Special Issue (December), s7-s14. Stillman, R. (1990). The Peculiar ‘Stateless’ Origins of Public Administration and the Consequences
Publius. "The Federalist No. 10." The Constitutional Society. October 21, 2013. Accessed February 24, 2014. http://www.constitution.org/fed/federa10.html.
While the government of the United States owes its existence to the contents and careful thought behind the Constitution, some attention must be given to the contributions of a series of essays called the Federalist Papers towards this same institution. Espousing the virtues of equal representation, these documents also promote the ideals of competent representation for the populace and were instrumental in addressing opposition to the ratification of the Constitution during the fledgling years of the United States. With further reflection, the Federalists, as these essays are called, may in turn owe their existence, in terms of their intellectual underpinnings, to the writings of the philosopher and teacher, Aristotle.
Lowi, Theodore J, et al. American Government Power & Purpose. 12th Ed. New York: W. W.
MARTIN KELLY, Overview of United States Government and Politics Foundation and Principles, 2011, retrieved February 21st 2011 from http://americanhistory.about.com/od/governmentandpolitics/a/amgovoverview.htm
Modern Bureaucracy in the United States serves to administer, gather information, conduct investigations, regulate, and license. Once set up, a bureaucracy is inherently conservative. The reason the bureaucracy was initiated may not continue to exist as a need in the future. The need or reason may change with a change in the times and the culture needs. A bureaucracy tends to make decisions that protect it and further it’s own existence, possibly apart from the wishes of the populace. It may not consistently reflect what might be optimal in terms of the needs and wants of the people. Local governments employ most of the United States civil servants. The 14 cabinet departments in the U.S. are run day-to-day by career civil servants, which have a great deal of discretionary authority.
Farnham, D. Horton, S. (1995) Managing the new public services (3rd edn) (Macmillan Press Ltd)
Kenneth Ashworth, a public servant, has served Texas and its fine education for more than thirty years and knows all the ins and outs of how the government works. He has written his book to benefit his niece, who has decided to follow in his footsteps, of all of his dealings from problematic politicians to many life lessons that have shaped him. Intended for his niece, this book has opened the minds for not only me and my peers, but for students around the state. After reading Caught between the Dog and the Fireplug, or How to Survive Public Service, Kenneth Ashworth makes a truthful point of knowing what the differences of personal responsibility and social responsibility is as a bureaucrat. Ashworth shows that social and personal responsibility can be two of the same if the morals of the person acting upon them are in good conscious.
Burns, James MacGregor, J.W Peltason, Thomas E. Cronin, and David B. Magleby. Government By The People. 01-02 Edition ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall, 2002
The applying of this approach in the public sector implied a shift from Traditional Management, to different ways of seeing bureaucracy, pointing out the mistakes and failures of the previous policies in this sector, with the believe on the fact that skillful public managers with an entrepreneurial view bring value to the public sector (Moore, 1995). The key point is the shift of the paradigm, changing the public administration for the public management. Bringing the public sector to play along in the markets with competitive skills, along with the private sector, regarding services’ provision to the clients, characterized by quality and out-comings. The main change between the traditional approach and the NPM can be seen through the relation of the next chart (Figure 1).
Woodrow Wilson’s purpose in writing “The Study of Administration” is to bring awareness that the government systems in place need to be re-evaluated and improved. Wilson encourages we need to examine the history of administration set forth by others in determining certain needs to be accomplished in effective ways and methods. Wilson’s desirable outcomes for research within the public administration field are for government systems to become more productive and organized.
Public Administration involves the development, implementation and management of policies for the attainment of set goals and objectives that will be to the benefit of the general public. Since Public Administration involves taking decisions that affect the use of public resources there is often the question of how to utilize public resources for maximum public good. The National Association of Public Administration has identified four pillars of public administration: economy, efficiency, effectiveness and social equity. These pillars are equally important in the practice of public administration and to its success. This paper seeks to explain the role of each of the pillars in the practice of public administration.
This essay discusses the radical transformation of the principles and foundations of public administration from traditional to New Public Management. Firstly the essay will attempt to define the key terms of traditional public administration and the doctrine of New Public Management. Rabin J. (2003) explains that New Public Management embodies “a process in public administration that uses information and experiences obtained in business management and other disciplines to improve efficiency, usefulness and general operation of public services in contemporary bureaucracies.“Traditional Public Administration progresses from governmental contributions, with services perceived by the bureaucracy.
Pfiffner, J. P. (2004). Traditional Public Administration versus The New Public Management:Accountability versus Efficiency. Unied States: George Mason University.
Public administration as a field of study and as a practice has continually evolved with American society. The United States has survived and thrived through major cultural shifts, varying degrees of economic climates, and both civil and world wars. Through out all these changes in our country, one thing has always remained the same, the fact that we are an ever evolving and always changing nation. Theories and forms of practice of public administration have also evolved parallel with the history of the United States. There have been numerous events in American history have lead to changes in society and the practice of public administration has both led and followed in the adaptation process of such monumental changes.
Public administration has both led the way for societal reforms and has followed the changes in society. One can only guess that the study and practice of public administration will continue to change with the further advances in society. Already there are many of issues that tomorrow’s public administrators will be dealing with. These issues will be varied and complex and will concern the ongoing development of computers, possible advancements in health care and science, and even major social and legislative shifts.