Character Analysis Of Catalonia In 'The Book Thief'

1187 Words3 Pages

Catalonia is a recognized autonomous region in the north-western region of Spain, Catalonia is home to the large Spanish city of Barcelona. Catalonia has long wanted to separate from what it sees as an oppressive Spanish government. In October 2017 Catalonia held a binding referendum regarding independence from Spain. The Spanish government deemed the referendum to be illegal and sent out special police forces who shut down polling stations and arrested separatist leaders. Despite the incredibly hostile environment of the referendum, ninety percent of Catalan voters voted to separate from Spain. The Catalan people stood up to the government by voting for separation, even though, the Spanish government forbade it, just like how characters defy …show more content…

An example of characters not falling in line with the Nazi’s in The Book Thief is when the Steiner family refuses to send Rudy away with the Nazi’s to train as an elite German soldier.(408-411) The Steiners defy the Nazi rule by not following what is expected of them and not being honored and immediately agreeing to send Rudy away. It is morally justifiable for the Steiners to not want to send their young son away for any reason especially for him to train as an elite soldier and then join the war. A second example of certain characters not falling in line with Nazi’s is how Hans Hubermann decided “ When Hitler rose to in 1933, though, the painting business fell slightly awry. Hans didn’t join the NSDAP like the majority of people did. He put a lot of thought into his decision.”(180) Hans does not fall in line with majority of Germans by not joining the NSDAP. This defies the Nazi’s power, but he does it for very moral reasons. Hans does not join the party because he believes in fairness, and he could not join a group who antagonized people for something that was out of their own …show more content…

The first example of people breaking the law to harbor an innocent in The Book Thief is when Hans and Rosa Hubermann harbor Max Vandenburg in their basement. (180-) Harboring a Jewish person in Nazi Germany would have been a very serious crime. The Hubermanns are morally justified in their decision to protect Max from the Nazi’s, because he is being prosecuted because of something that he can not control. There is no way for Max to change the fact that he is a jew and the Hubermanns know that he has not done anything wrong to deserve the way that he is being treated by society. The second example of characters breaking the law by protecting the innocent is how the Hubermanns adopt Liesel Meminger from her mother.(Whole Book) In part two of The Book Thief it is revealed that Liesel’s parents were communists, communists would have been another group that was prosecuted by the Nazi’s. By protecting young Liesel from Nazi authority and not reporting her or her mother to an authority the Hubermanns are breaking Nazi law. The actions that the Hubermanns take to protect Liesel from prosecution are morally justified because Liesel is just a little girl who knew nothing of her parents political views until they are revealed in part two. Had the Hubermanns turned Liesel in she would have likely been taken away and

Open Document