Character Analysis Of A Rose For Emily

731 Words2 Pages

A Rose for Emily is a short story wrote by William Faulkner. This story has five central characters Miss Emily Grierson, Tobe, the town’s people, Miss Emily Grierson’s father and Homer Barron. A Rose for Emily is a story that goes from present to past quite frequently. This Southern Gothic tale takes place in a small town that Emily lives in. Miss Emily Grierson from the narrative is the main character. Emily is a black old Southern woman that is all about time staying still and about being in control. I say this because in paragraph four William Faulkner explains Miss Emily’s home. It states on paragraph four page 629, “it smelled like dust and disuse-a close, dank smell.” (Faulkner, William, and M. Thomas Inge. A Rose for Emily. Columbus, …show more content…

Grierson. Mr. Grierson was a man that was known for giving the town a huge loan. On page 628, it says on paragraph three “Miss Emily’s father had loaned money to the town.” He was also a controlling man to Emily. He told her that she could not date and so on.
Lately, Homer Barron a man from the Northern side of the United States. Homer was a man that everyone in the town loved. He worked on the roads creating the pavement. He and Emily had a relationship developing but Homer did not want to pursue into marriage anytime soon. Barron was the type of man that liked to hang out with younger men and not so much Miss Emily. Homer Barron one day went to Emily’s and left but for a long time no one in the town seemed to noticed his disappearance.
In conclusion, A Rose for Emily these characters are what create the story into one. Without each person, it would not help explain each individual. Mr. William Faulkner the creator of this story knew how to make it where each paragraph even when going past to present into a good flowing story. Making it where it described Emily’s death, to her past, present, and so on. Also, Explaining Homer, Tobe, town’s people, and Emily’s father to where it explained there story yet conformed into one whole. The only thing about this story is that it never truly explains why the title was named A Rose for

Open Document