Cardiopulmonary Death Essay

627 Words2 Pages

The definition of death is crucial for the benefit of the person, their family, and those who wait for organs. The first definition, the total stoppage of the circulation of the blood, and cessation of vital functions such as the heart and lungs. Cardiopulmonary considers the state of deep irreversible unconsciousness life and disregards the necessity of organs (Pojman 101). Thus, the second definition is declaring death despite vital signs like cardiopulmonary death—whole brain death concludes the cerebrum (higher brain) and brainstem (lower brain) losing function is the end of life (Pojman 102). Similarly, it involves the death of an organism. Indifference, it allows for functioning organs to be harvested before being damaged by time and it limits the definition of life. The final …show more content…

Otherwise, cardiopulmonary death is faulted for its definition of life. It overall is financially improbable and considers those without functioning brains to be alive, consequently minimizing organ transfer. As well, whole brain death is unreasonable for its consideration of the state of unconsciousness to be life. For both cases, the state of comatose is merely a state of life to emotionally support loved ones and financially is a detriment—no benefit to the patient. Convincingly, neocortical brain death considers life to end at the permanent state of unconsciousness. It is unfair to declare life where it is no longer experienced, and as well for the loved one’s memories to be tainted by a state of eternal sleep is taxing. Additionally, the demand for organs is unfathomable, the move toward neocortical brain death would increase the lives saved. Ultimately, the person society cares about ceases to exist when the cerebrum is no longer functioning; ethically it is considerate to declare death at this stage and it is for the betterment of

More about Cardiopulmonary Death Essay

Open Document