Cannabis Legalization

1225 Words3 Pages

Cannabis Legalization

Discuss: “Cannabis is no more harmful than tobacco or alcohol and should, therefore, be legalised.”

There has recently been much debate in the media about the decriminalisation of cannabis, both for recreational and medicinal use. This topic has proved controversial especially in political circles. Drawing on evidence from recent press reports, research on the web and recent publications, this essay will assess the evidence of how harmful cannabis really is.

In 1971 Cannabis was reclassified by parliament and became a schedule 1 drug. This means that it was viewed as having no medicinal value. In 2002, Cannabis was reclassified again as a Class C drug meaning that it is seen as less harmful in comparison to other drugs such as Cocaine. This is reflected in the way offenders are processed by the criminal justice system, having relatively lenient sentences or cautions. These changes in the law reflect changing public perceptions and increased tolerance of soft drug use contributing to the public pressure to legalise cannabis.

Several studies have indicated that cannabis use may be beneficial for certain medical conditions. Teeson et al (2002) argue that cannabis use is helpful for of Multiple Sclerosis, Tourettes Syndrome, epilepsy and HIV related illnesses.

Barton (2003) disputes the idea that cannabis use causes dependency and this is one argument that opponents of the legalization of cannabis forward. Barton suggests that,

“We can only assume that for the vast majority of drug users their drug use is occasional and spasmodic, or that drugs prove pretty well harmless to most people.”

However, as mentioned previously this is a controversial area. These theorists broadly support the notion that cannabis is no more harmful than tobacco or alcohol and should perhaps be legalised. Furthermore Teeson et al (2002) indicates out that like cannabis use there are some positive affects of alcohol use.

Research published on the internet, especially reports written by the British Medical Association (BMA) also backs up the positive effects of cannabis use, for those with legitimate medical conditions. This lends strength to the statement in the essay title.

In a trial investigating the benefits of cannabis in relation to sufferers of Multiple Sclerosis the results were extremely positive. Dr Willy Notcutt said,

“W...

... middle of paper ...

...the other hand mental health concerns mean that the legalisation of cannabis may be ill-judged.

On balance therefore the legalisation of cannabis for medicinal purposes will be of great benefit to those with genuine medical conditions particularly Multiple Sclerosis sufferers, epileptics and HIV patients. However it should not be made widely available for the general public because of the effects on mental and physical health.

In effect therefore the statement can be criticised because mental illness and psychotic episodes have been reported indicating that cannabis is harmful to the general public. Therefore legalisation should be avoided.

Bibliography

Gossop Michael, “Living with Drugs, 5TH edition” Ashgate Arena Aldershot (2001)

Teesson Maree “Addictions” Psychology Press New York (2002)

Tinklenberg R Jared “Marijuana and Health Hazards, Methodical Issues in Current Research” (1975) Academic Press Inc New York

Barton Adrian “Illicit Drugs” Ashgate London (2000)

World Wide Web

www.bmj.com

www.thecompassionclub.org

www.bbc.co.uk/news

www.my.marijuana.com

www.guardian.co.uk

www.drugs-info.co.uk

www.mcgill.ca

www.cannabisclub.ca

Open Document