Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Physiological effects of marijuana
Causes and effects of smoking
Physiological effects of marijuana
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Physiological effects of marijuana
Cannabis Legalization
Discuss: “Cannabis is no more harmful than tobacco or alcohol and should, therefore, be legalised.”
There has recently been much debate in the media about the decriminalisation of cannabis, both for recreational and medicinal use. This topic has proved controversial especially in political circles. Drawing on evidence from recent press reports, research on the web and recent publications, this essay will assess the evidence of how harmful cannabis really is.
In 1971 Cannabis was reclassified by parliament and became a schedule 1 drug. This means that it was viewed as having no medicinal value. In 2002, Cannabis was reclassified again as a Class C drug meaning that it is seen as less harmful in comparison to other drugs such as Cocaine. This is reflected in the way offenders are processed by the criminal justice system, having relatively lenient sentences or cautions. These changes in the law reflect changing public perceptions and increased tolerance of soft drug use contributing to the public pressure to legalise cannabis.
Several studies have indicated that cannabis use may be beneficial for certain medical conditions. Teeson et al (2002) argue that cannabis use is helpful for of Multiple Sclerosis, Tourettes Syndrome, epilepsy and HIV related illnesses.
Barton (2003) disputes the idea that cannabis use causes dependency and this is one argument that opponents of the legalization of cannabis forward. Barton suggests that,
“We can only assume that for the vast majority of drug users their drug use is occasional and spasmodic, or that drugs prove pretty well harmless to most people.”
However, as mentioned previously this is a controversial area. These theorists broadly support the notion that cannabis is no more harmful than tobacco or alcohol and should perhaps be legalised. Furthermore Teeson et al (2002) indicates out that like cannabis use there are some positive affects of alcohol use.
Research published on the internet, especially reports written by the British Medical Association (BMA) also backs up the positive effects of cannabis use, for those with legitimate medical conditions. This lends strength to the statement in the essay title.
In a trial investigating the benefits of cannabis in relation to sufferers of Multiple Sclerosis the results were extremely positive. Dr Willy Notcutt said,
“W...
... middle of paper ...
...the other hand mental health concerns mean that the legalisation of cannabis may be ill-judged.
On balance therefore the legalisation of cannabis for medicinal purposes will be of great benefit to those with genuine medical conditions particularly Multiple Sclerosis sufferers, epileptics and HIV patients. However it should not be made widely available for the general public because of the effects on mental and physical health.
In effect therefore the statement can be criticised because mental illness and psychotic episodes have been reported indicating that cannabis is harmful to the general public. Therefore legalisation should be avoided.
Bibliography
Gossop Michael, “Living with Drugs, 5TH edition” Ashgate Arena Aldershot (2001)
Teesson Maree “Addictions” Psychology Press New York (2002)
Tinklenberg R Jared “Marijuana and Health Hazards, Methodical Issues in Current Research” (1975) Academic Press Inc New York
Barton Adrian “Illicit Drugs” Ashgate London (2000)
World Wide Web
www.bmj.com
www.thecompassionclub.org
www.bbc.co.uk/news
www.my.marijuana.com
www.guardian.co.uk
www.drugs-info.co.uk
www.mcgill.ca
www.cannabisclub.ca
legalized medical cannabis use on a state level already, many people are curious what will happen next. In The Long and Winding road to Cannabis Legalization it is stated, “Clearly, prohibition does not work and the debate on legalization of cannabis gains momentum. This debate is often emotional, with strong views of both proponents and opponents. Those who are in favor of legalization tend to ignore the negative health effects of cannabis use. Those who are against legalization ignore the fact that
assess the advantages and disadvantages of Cannabis Legalisation in Australia There are many advantages to the complete legalisation of cannabis in Australia, however along with legalising the drug, the issues with eradicating the issues that is strung along with cannabis use should be considered. The history behind the stigmatism of cannabis in the United States should be considered when assessing the legalisation of the drug as much of the symbolism of cannabis was stemmed from the association of illegal
foreseen their consequences. The issue of the legalization of drugs has been a topic of interest and is one of the most controversial topics of all time. The topic at hand has raised various arguments, which include the “War on Drugs”. One argument claims that all drugs should be legalized, as they aid in medical and recreational uses. Another argument believes that, the legalization will do more harm than good, and have negative impacts on the human body. Cannabis, ecstasy and Heroin are just a few names
deaths are caused by alcohol poisoning. On the other hand marijuana cannot cause death from overdose due to being nontoxic. So why should marijuana remain illegal? Many think marijuana should remain illegal, but legalization would have much more advantages if it were legalized already. Legalization has plenty of benefits, but most ideas are shunned by the media, which only shows the cons of decriminalization. It can help out the economy, which is not doing so well at the moment. There would be a decrease
Legalizing and Taxing marijuana has its ups and its downs. The United States federal government makes cannabis illegal to sell and own. Many States now are legalizing the selling of marijuana and owning of it even though Federal Law makes it illegal but State and Federal government are separate. Taxing marijuana would be a huge revenue producer for taxpayers. You can tax it as much as you want. When its comes to taxing marijuana the state can have any tax they want on it. States can profit millions
even legalize, marijuana use for medical perposes. In fact, two states, Washington and Colorado, have legalized the recreational use of marijuana for anybody over the age of twenty-one since 2012. (Hawken, Caulkins, Kilmer, and Kleiman 2013) The legalization and regulation of marijuana would greatly minimize crime and solve many problems including overcrowding of jails and prison, lowering the tax dollars that people need to pay in order to support these incarcerated criminals, and regulating the economy
public health and crime rate. Pro marijuana legalization protestors believe legalizing drugs will bring economic relief. The government can increase tax revenue by putting a sales tax on drugs. Studies show that, if marijuana was taxed at rates comparable to those on alcohol and tobacco, government could earn around six billion dollars annually. Government can use this money to fund important social objectives like healthcare and education. Also legalization of drugs can decrease government expenditures
Rogerian Argument for Marijuana Legalization The cannabis plant has been the topic of much debate throughout the history of this country. Many people don't know that it was not the effect of cannabis that originally spurred its banning. It was actually originally the work of the cotton industry who put big money behind illegalization for the plant's mind altering effects. The cotton industry was afraid that hemp, a product of the cannabis plant, would soon overpower the strong hold of cotton
Margaret Somerville, who has authored, edited, and co-edited a number of books and newspaper articles opposing the use of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide and who also is the Samuel Gale Professor of Law, Professor in the Faculty of Medicine, and Founding Director of the Centre for Medicine, Ethics, and Law at McGill University, Montreal, wrote the internet article titled “Against Euthanasia.” In the article Somerville blatantly states that any type of euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide
Drugs and Legalization Since early on man has been interested in the consumption of substances that altered the mind or ones feeling. The consumption of substances can be broken down into legal and illegal substances. The question is, who are we to label certain substances illegal and prohibit others from using them by creating penalties for their use? If the importation, sale and use of drugs were legal, the open competition would eliminate the profitability of drug dealing. Without the economic
of the revenue be used exclusively for education. On the surface, both sides’ opinions and arguments are seemingly valid and deserve the attention of the state’s legislative bodies. On one hand, you have those who hold the opinion that said legalization would prove beneficial to the State by providing a much-needed revenue source that would propel the State’s education system into the 21st century. Basically, that legalized gambling would bail out the State’s ailing education system. On the
Legalizing Drugs Drug legalization is an enduring question that presently faces our scholars. This issue embraces two positions: drugs should not be legalized and drugs should be legalized. These two positions contain an array of angles that supports each issue. This brief of the issues enables one to consider the strengths and weakness of each argument, become aware of the grounds of disagreement and agreement and ultimately form an opinion based upon the positions stated within the articles
believe that once it is legal to purchase organs from recipients it will become a bidding war. The only person that will win this war, will be the person with the greatest amount of money. One of Gregory’s supporting claims is the very idea that legalization might sound gruesome to most people, but it shouldn't, especially since research shows it would save lives. Although it’s saving lives why should it become
it will help better the drug association economy, advance medicine, and force law enforcement to be used more wisely. Legality would have more beneficial factors than negative. Even if there were not full legalization, there should be decriminalization, making charges less stern, and legalization in all 50 states permitting marijuana to be used
Recently, the California elections proposed a controversial new law for the state to apply a new tax on cannabis, Proposition 19. Many reasons arise to contest this new proposition. Firstly, we currently do not have a sufficient system in place to prevent the dispersion of cannabis to minors. Secondly, drivers already have enough to be concerned about, such as drunk drivers and people using cell-phones, therefore we should not add marijuana as an additional influence for people to have open access