Gender and healthcare has had a complex relationship for many years. Although women have been waiting patiently for a change in the system, it has failed to address the issue. Women have been oppressed by the healthcare system for too long and therefore there is a need to provide equality in not only this field, but also many others. The healthcare system imposes a barrier to accessing effective care to women because they don't take into account the daily restrictions a woman has due to her social standing on the gender spectrum. Thus, these create a negative effect on women’s health and a more difficult time due to susceptibility.
Since women aren’t properly considered when given treatment due to their “inadequate understanding” of the complications
…show more content…
This is addressed by Candy Sagon, in her article “The Gender Bias of Medicine” (2017), claims that women are more susceptible to certain diseases rather than men, therefore, the medical care for women should be significantly improved and thoroughly thought about. Sagon supports her argument by explaining that different diseases and their effects on both a man and a woman to prove that their bodies respond to drugs and diseases differently. Often times women have been misdiagnosed due to the “154-pound (70-kilogram) white male” and therefore it is important to include women into more experiments to evaluate reactions to different drugs and diseases. Her purpose is to manipulate the audience's in order to exhibit that since women are more susceptible and aren’t received adequate care to make up for it, most of the time the pain is dismissed because women are thought of to show pain on a more physical level than a man. She establishes a casual tone that urges the reader to understand that there will be a negative effect on the woman in the end if not included, but if a man is unwilling to change his mindset for the greater good, this unfortunate oppression will continue to deteriorate. Not only does it identify the effects of women, but it also shows the effects on men, where they are sometimes oppressed in a similar manner to a woman. Also, Kenneth Miller, in her article, “How Health Care Fails Women” declares that women often have hardships finding the right care with a physician who will take their pain seriously, which most of the time isn’t taken into consideration because of their gender. Many times women aren’t given proper care because they are “accused of drug seeking,” however, these considerations are neglected when it comes to men. Miller supports her assertion
Mary Jo DiLonardo states in her essay that women wait longer than men to receive pain medications. In the medical field men and women are treated different when it comes to pain. Women were thirteen to twenty five percent less likely to receive pain medication. DiLonardo states that men received more pain medication and women received
illustrates the discrimination against women and the issues that arise from a gender double standard society.
Cultural meanings of gender can play heavily into therapeutic effects of the client. A female client who is in therapy with her male partner may not have the “right” to speak against what he is saying if she disagrees; some cultures forbid the woman to go against her male partner or even speak in the presence of a male stranger, which could be the clinician. On the other hand, a male client with the above cultural custom may view a female clinician in a nega...
Gender Matters is a collection of various essays on feminist linguistic texts analysis, by Sara Mills. Mills develops methods of analyzing literary and non-literary texts, in addition to conversational analysis based on a feminist approach. The author draws on data from her collection of essays gathered over the last two decades on feminism during the 1990s. The essays focus on gender issues, the representation of gender in reading, writing, and in public speaking. Furthermore, it highlights the importance of feminists’ analysis of sexism in literature and the relation between gender and politeness. The article is informative for my research paper, as my topic is going to cover language analysis of the text and who women reading and writing differs according to the discourse analysis within linguistic, psychology, case studies audiences and surveys. The book would be helpful, particularly the last three essays that discusses gender, public speaking, the question of politeness and impoliteness in public speaking. Mills’ analysis is not complete without including the idea of global notions of both women and men, to see whether women and men write and read in the same way globally. Therefore, an update would enrich the book’s discussion section. Although, Mills addresses the class and race theme in language and public speaking, I will only look into the role of language that plays a part in doing or reducing gender in literary, non-literary texts and in conversation.
They incorporate intersectionality theory, complexity theory, and the social determinants of health techniques to embody the individual’s encounters and then to reason to the wider social location demonstrated by the means of the individual, which assists to accepting healthcare access and procedures in the region of women’s health inequities. McGibbon and McPherson argue that a center foundation of the perception of feminist intersectionality is the focal point on the debriefing of power in society and the structural precursors of oppression. (McGibbon and McPherson, Pg.61). This pretty much is one of the highest essential capacity contributions of the intersectionality principle to health care is the prevailing of power. The sort of the essential aspect on diversity could have a number of advantages. Initially, it'd counter the impulse to cut the patients to biological entities and as a substitute centralize on the person in a social relational context. It isn't that biology is irrelevant; since one of the disputes associated with the concept of intersectionality is how to incorporate biology. A more state of the art evaluation of power relations afforded by thinking about intersecting social areas may prevent the intricate prioritization of some differences over others, for
Its 1:30 am and you are have just experienced a major car wreck. You are in the ambulance where the paramedics are telling you it will be ok just hold still big. You arrive at the emergency room and everything is a blurred. You don’t care if the nurse is a female or a male. You don’t stop the male nurse from caring for you. But what happens when you go to the doctor for a follow up visit and see a male nurse? Do you still see a powerful male that saved your life or a powerless manweak feminine failure ? When providing care for a patient, a male nurse faces challenges such as gender bias and judgement .
At the NIH conference, some researchers argued that sex differences in pain are substantial and argued specifically that women are more sensitive to pain. For example, women report pain more often and also report it at higher levels than men. Additionally, when men and women are exposed to the same pain stimulus, women will say that they are in pain more quickly than men (1).
In the study, the researchers reference the fact that most research done in comparing pain thresholds among men and women report “lower pain threshold, higher pain ratings, and lower pain tolerance for women,” and there is much room for debate whether these differences are due to biological characteristics or differences in coping and expression. Regardless of these differences, Hoffman and Tarzian note the fact that doctors themselves respond differently to pain complaints from males vs females. They reported that in a study done by Faherty and Grier, “physicians prescribed less pain medication for women aged 55 or older than for men in the same age group, and that nurses gave less pain medication to women aged 25 to 54”. Another study done by McCaffery and Ferrell actually measured the bias among healthcare providers.
In the book Difference Matters, Brenda J Allen, begins writing about how gender matters in society. One of the main topics that she talks about is how in today’s society the male gender is the more predominate gender. As the reader, she has brought to mind many new ways to view how males earn more money then females, how we classify jobs as masculine or feminine, and also how society excepts males’ vs females to act and preform in the work force.
“Almost half of all pregnancies among American women are unintended [and of those pregnancies about] 1.3 billion each year, are ended by abortion.” (Dudley). Most women that receive an abortion are clueless of the type of health risk that are associated with the abortion. According to the American Nurses Associated, “Patients have the moral and legal right to determine what [would] be done with their own person; to be given accurate, complete and understandable information in a manner that facilitates and informed judgement” (Barnes) Meaning, before given treatment the patient must be informed of some of the risks that are involved. They should be given all of the facts related to their situation in order to make an informed decision. Informing the patient of the risks associated with the procedure is done before every operation, or most operations. Women who have abortions are not informed of...
Equality and diversity by Irwin Wendy address the need for equality in healthcare professions and how it affects the individual. Equality and diversity plays a huge role between patients, families and other healthcare professionals. It takes a unique look distinctive when analysing the support needs of patients in terms of equal opportunities as well as their choices and preferences as the National health service opens to a wide range of people to access the services .
In this book, Riska and Wegar give insight into why many believe that women physicians will never be true equals in the American medical profession. They back many of their ideas up with personal experiences, hard facts and data. They discuss the idea of a ‘glass ceiling’ in which women are kept out of the top positions because of sexism. This book really helps research the ideas about women’s equality and the hardships that they have faced as they have developed in this career field. Not only does it tie in with the history, but it gives good evidence to support why it was so hard. Later on in the book, the authors also discussed women physicians as being the possible new force in today’s medicine. They talk about how women are now being overrepresented in comparison to males in some areas of the field. This book provides evidence of women’s suffrage in the field, but also how they are persevering and overcoming their
The word gender is mentioned severally in the 140 page policy document. It is stated that there is evidence that the social perception that shapes the role and position of women in society, hence their gender, is a common denominator when health issues affecting women are considered. Other words like principles, key health issues and social determinants of health have been used widely. The term social determinants stands out in this policy because it represents the impacts on health caused by social factors like sex and gender, stage in life of a woman, being or not being endowed economically and diversity in terms of marginalisation (Morgan, Glass and Davidson,
These experiences are unique to women due to the fact that we live in a world where we’re opposed, devalued, and traditionally held to lower status than men. This is especially true for women of color, those who are dis/abled, and of lower socioeconomic status. The research conducted ultimately creates greater knowledge and
In the operation of the healthcare system, gender plays a central role. Gender discrimination in the healthcare exists either in the field of education, workplace or while attending to the patients. Interestingly, as opposed to other areas where discrimination lies heavily to a particular gender; gender inequality in health happens to both women and men. Gender inequality in the health care service negatively affects the quality of care given and perpetuates patient biases to a gender. Also, the gender disparities in the field of health assists researchers and practitioners to study conditions and their probable manifestations within both sexes.