Campus Carry Summary

569 Words2 Pages

In the article, “Campus carry is problematic, but not dangerous”, Mac McCann discusses the issue of campus carry, specifically on the University of Texas at Austin campus. He opens by making it clear as an alum of UT he does not approve of Texas SB 11. This change allows concealed handguns in the buildings of public universities and, overall, the UT community has not welcomed it. McCann supports his position against the campus carry policy by providing anecdotes from professors tied to UT. One of the first examples was from Daniel Hamermesh, an economics professor at UT prior to campus carry, that pointed out that this new law has made it so that an unhappy student could, more easily, cause violence in the classroom and threaten everyone’s safety. Furthermore, Siva Vaidhyanathan, a former candidate for a dean position, explained that classrooms are places of discussion and the introduction of a weapon could make those participating hold back out of fear. Although McCann’s position is …show more content…

He mostly uses quotations from professors to support his claim that campus carry is an issue. The article does contain a good amount of relevant support for his argument as it is all from professors connected to UT, but not good support as the research shows that the campus environment will most likely not be affected. However, he does make it clear that campus carry has already effect UT’s academics and that campus carry creates a fear of violence in a place meant to foster thought, which is two important points. As a whole, McCann is able to show that, although research may show that there is not much effect on campus life due to campus carry, the fear it creates is undeniable. The target audience of such an article is students of public universities and, more likely, their parents, who are concerned about the effects of this new law on their children’s college experience and want reassurance about their child’s

Open Document