Caliban Dystopia Essay

There is a fine line between one man’s Utopia and another man’s Dystopia. Conceivably the furthermost expressive of Shakespeare’s interpretations of colonialism is bestowed in the character of Caliban. He does not appreciate the activities of Prospero as a “missionary” who attempts to improve his life. Caliban is undoughtily in conflict with the authority that now governs him. His hatred concerning his conqueror and master is recognized as a legitimate reaction displayed among the colonized. Prospero becomes equivalent to a marionette master, controlling and manipulating everyone on the island. Caliban yearnings to fight back against colonizer blasphemes him and is disobedient, this is emphasized by his very first worlds, “As wicked dew as

324-327). He continually reminds Prospero that the island, with forceful incursion, taken away from him, “This island’s mine, by Sycorax my mother, which thou tak’st from me” (1.2. 333-334). Corresponding those throughout history, have protested the new rulers of colonialism. Maranda claims to have tried to teach language to, “Thy vile race, though thou didst learn” (1.2. 361-362). It is apparent that because he would not embrace English language Caliban is evaluated as inferior, not only materializing as something less than human but truly being barbaric. Caliban responds that “my profit on’t is I know how to curse” (1.2. 366-367). This illustrates how Prospero is under the delusion of transforming Caliban into a civil person since Caliban does not desire to acquire his language. Caliban, consequently, has no modification of nature and endures at the culmination of the play what he existed as at the commencement. The authority and criterions of Prospero are in direct conflict with the natural liberties of Caliban. The play demonstrates the defiance of the colonized to the governance of the colonizer and the hostility to preserve ones culture contrary to oppositional