Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Politics in an organization
Aspects of crisis management
Crisis management theory literature review
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Politics in an organization
Finding a Leader to Execute a Comeback As they increase their global presence by appealing to a larger market, luxury fashion houses risk losing their exclusive reputations. Although they may temporarily benefit from an increase in customers, fashion houses can no longer produce products that invoke a sense of limitedness and status, which primarily appeal to luxury customers (Yeoman & McMahon-Beattie, 2014). At the same time, when fashion houses increasingly focus on meeting the demand of their larger markets, they will inevitably lose the creativity, quality, and exclusivity of their products as well (Yeoman & McMahon-Beattie, 2014). Although fashion houses may attempt to recover their tarnished brands, they will often enter a state of paralysis. …show more content…
I will then discuss how Angela Ahrendts identified these issues by analyzing Burberry’s internal and external environments. Because she conducted this analysis, I believe Ahrendts recognized that Burberry’s issues stemmed from its tarnished brand. I will elaborate on this assertion by revealing how Ahrendts framed these issues as four strategic challenges that focused on redeveloping Burberry’s brand. I will subsequently identify the tactics that Ahrendts used to encourage her employees to understand these strategic challenges. In particular, I will go in depth to discuss the methods that Ahrendts used to encourage Burberry employees to develop a connection with the company’s brand. I will assert that Ahrendts followed this approach because she wanted her employees to develop innovative solutions around the company’s new brand. I will provide examples of these solutions, which tightened Burberry’s business strategy and organizational structure. I will conclude my paper by assessing the political tactics that Ahrendts applied to avoid potential resistance to her agenda. I will specifically reveal how Ahrendts successfully executed her agenda because she established a coalition with former Chief Creative Officer Christopher …show more content…
During the early 2000s, former CEO Rose Marie Bravo expanded Burberry’s global presence by licensing its infamous beige checkered brown design to over 23 fashion houses in countries like Japan, Germany and the United States (The Economist, 2001; Neate, 2013) However, these fashion houses abused Burberry’s designs by excessively producing products that were inconsistent with the Burberry brand. This behavior also became rampant among counterfeiters who further diminished Burberry’s brand as well (Neate, 2013). Although it had established a global presence, Burberry consequently overproduced products that became ubiquitous throughout the world and synonymous with counterfeiting culture (Neate,
People are often deceived by some famous brands, which they will buy as useless commodities to feel they are distinctive. People require brands to experience the feeling of being special. People spend their money to have something from famous brands, like a bag from Coach or Louis Vuitton which they think they need, yet all that is just people’s wants. Steve McKevitt claims that people give more thought on features or brands when they need to buy a product, “It might even be the case that you do need a phone to carry out your work and a car to get around in, but what brand it is and, to a large extent, what features it has are really just want” (McKevitt, 145), which that means people care about brands more than their needs. Having shoes from Louis Vuitton or shoes that cost $30 it is designed for the same use.
In “No Logo” Naomi Klein presents a convincing and well-documented look into how “branding” has enabled multi-national corporations to take over the way many Americans make purchases; however, since her argument fails to include the all-important human factors often overlooked by corporations and the proliferation of Internet-based retailers who are able to deal goods directly to the consumer, it is incomplete.
It is interesting to consider Veblen’s theory of conspicuous consumption as it pertains to the modern day fashion industry, specifically the luxury fashion sector. In The Theory of the Leisure Class, Veblen said “we all find a costly hand-wrought articles of apparel much preferable to a less expensive imitation of it;” however, at the beginning of the 20th century, couture clothing was exclusively available to those who were very wealthy, simply because of how much the garments cost. By the mid-1930’s, businesses were beginning to change their ways of thinking after seeing the enormous profit that the Walt Disney Company received once they licensed the making of Mickey Mouse novelty items. Christian Dior was the first of many fashion designers to foll...
The designer label Burberry was rescued from the dusty discount bin in the late 1990s and early 2000s, and transformed back into a major fashion brand, before being successfully spun off by owners GUS as a separate company. It is one of the few distinctively British designer fashion labels.
Swinton, J. (n.d). How Burberry's digital strategy is boosting brand value. Available: http://www.theguardian.com/media-network/partner-zone-brand-union/burberry-digital-strategy-brand. Last accessed 20th March 2014.
Six years after deciding to be an independent public company in late 2000, Coach Inc.’s net sales had grown at a compounded annual rate of 26 percent and the stock price had increased by 1,400 percent due to a strategy keyed to a concept called accessible luxury. Coach crafted the accessible luxury category in women’s handbags and leather accessories by differentiating themselves on price, but matching competitors on styling, quality, and customer service. The accessible luxury strategy mirrors a focus (or market niche) strategy based on low costs. Coach concentrates on a narrow buyer segment and outcompetes rivals by having lower costs than rivals and thus being able to serve niche members at a lower price. Management believed that new products should be based on market research rather than on designers’ instincts. Coach utilized extensive consumer surveys and focus groups to gain insight in the market, and ultimately a competitive advantage over competition. Coach’s $200-$500 handbags appealed to both middle class consumers who now were able to afford a taste of luxury, as well as affluent consumers with the means to spend $2,000 on a handbag on a regular basis.
Luxury goods are not the necessities but are very much desirable to people which is supported by a share of money income. They are not easily available and affordable for everyone but due to the coming up of competition in market this has been changed. Nowadays, every individual wants to raise their self high and wants to be different from everyone. Since, the times have changed luxury goods have become more affordable for middle class consumers. Whenever we open our social media accounts such as Instagram, snapchats or news on internet or be it the reality shows, it is full of rich people showing off their dresses, bags, accessories etc. Such news put an impact on our inner thinking about our need to look and feel good through rich possessions. Several manufactured goods have become luxury goods as they are designer, durable and better quality. These goods are considered as luxury goods by the consumers because they play a role of status and class for those who showcase or owns them. These items are not necessarily better than less expensive substitutes are purchased with the main purpose of showcasing their wealth. These kinds of goods are object of socio-economic phenomenon which includes watches, jewelleries, designer clothes and accessories, large
Primark is a subsidiary company of the Associated British Foods (ABF). It was first opened in Dublin in June 1969, which under the name Penneys. Four more stores were launched within a year in Ireland afterward. Currently, Primark operates in over 270 stores in 9 different countries in Europe such as United Kingdom, Germany, Spain, etc. Primark capitalised on the fast-fashion tendency that began in the 1990s as well as the capability to produce garments cheaply in Asia where clothing values fell dramatically (Shawcross, 2014). It offers a diverse range of products which includes kids clothing, menswear, womenswear, accessories, home ware, beauty products and confectionary. According to TNS market research ranking, Primark ranks the second
2006). Burberry’s product line, especially the famous trademark plaid, unfortunately, is not difficult to imitate, the development of “fake Burberry” affects their revenue. In 2010, Burberry won $1.5 million in counterfeit case (Matthew 2010), but the counterfeit apparel and accessories is still the key issue for all major luxury brand (Maman 2012).
Miuccia Prada once said that “What you wear is how you present yourself to the world, especially today, when human contacts are so quick. Fashion is instant language”. Miuccia Prada and the Prada brand have grown from humble beginnings making quality leather goods to a public traded company with a current market capitalization of over $26 billion (USD) . With the development of Prada as one of the world’s premier luxury brands it provides an excellent case study to examine how strategy paved the way for the success of the Prada brand. First, an examination of Prada’s strategic positioning against luxury brand rivals Louis Vuitton Hennessey Moet (LVHM) and Kering (Gucci). The acquisition history of Prada will be reviewed, where some preliminary conclusions can be made about what has been contributing factors to both the successes and failures. Then finally, an evaluation of what the future holds for Prada and the sustainability of its competitive advantage.
For the past several decades, globalization has been a hot topic and it also anticipates every aspect of the world to connect each other. Likewise, globalization also allows consumers to have more access to catch up with updated fashion. The advantages of globalization bring a new philosophy called fast fashion, which holds quick response time and enhanced design in fashion apparel industry. In this paper, I will deliver By exploring all the aspects of each system, I will conclude the reason why fast fashion becomes the mainstream of the fashion apparel industry, and use one particular brand, Zara, as an example to discover the impact on consumer behavior in detail. Finally I will make some comments on the future of fast fashion and what luxury brands will react to this circumstance……..
With the growing trend of outsourcing manufacturing processes to emerging economies, brands are facing an increasing growth of counterfeit goods. These goods attempt to imitate luxury brands, which in the long run erode the value and the reputation of the brands (Staake et al. 2009). Consequently, counterfeits are becoming a growing concern for status, prestige and luxury brands.
By 2002, Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton was the world’s largest luxury products company, enjoying annual sales of 12.2 billion euros. LVMH carries the most prestigious brand names in wine, champagne, fashion, jewelry, and perfume. Upon entrance of this luxury product industry, LVMH was aware that they produced products that nobody needed, but that were desired by millions across the world. This desire in some way fulfills a fantasy, making consumers feel as though they must buy it, or else they will not be in the moment, and thus will be left behind.
-Status symbols: Sophisticated customers who value the distinctive, exclusive collection seem to value the corporate-branded version of luxury. –Philip Martiz, chairman of the board
“Despite worldwide softness in the sale of luxury goods, LVMH has cemented its position as the world’s largest and most profitable player in the category. To stay there it must keep its customers loyal and its brand strong and find new markets worldwide” (Hazlett C. 2004). That is why in its mission they state to represent the most refined qualities of Western “ art de vivre” all around the world. Their objective is to be the leader in the luxury market, continuing to transmit elegance and creativity. This poses some major challenges, the main one is to keep being the leader in the luxury market through a sustainable growth. The main problem to achieve it is the high dependency on three main countries, France, Japan and USA. This becomes a threat because if there is an economic downturn in one country it affects LVMH directly that is why.