Bros Before Hos Character Analysis

1426 Words3 Pages

It is said that guidelines are good to have, but it is not pointed out that they can be restricting. In other words, guidelines can help an individual know exactly what to do in a situation but can be detrimental to another individual because their natural ability to think outside of those guidelines is painfully stifled to appease societal standards. This statement is supported by the author Michael Kimmel of “Bros Before Hos” and the author Junot Diaz of “Drown”. The lens text “Bros Before Hos” lays out a helpful framework for understanding how, in particular, men must feel having to ostracize feelings and thoughts to stay within set guidelines that society expected for them to follow in the target text “Drown”. Indeed, in the target text, …show more content…

“Drown” has the following main characters: the unnamed male protagonist/narrator of the story, the mother of the protagonist, and Beto. Beto is an old friend of the narrator and is the only named character in the story. They are no longer close friends anymore since Beto tried to pursue the male protagonist twice sexually. “Drown” starts with the narrator’s mother telling him that Beto is back in town after a good while and that he should try to find Beto to catch up on each other’s lives. As the narrator looks for Beto, he begins to have these flashbacks of his relationship with Beto. They used to be best friends and would go around causing trouble and stealing together until one day they had sexual encounters that Beto unexpectedly tried to initiate with the narrator. The narrator has since then been a bit more reclusive whenever Beto is brought up into conversation, especially when his mother did so. The narrator’s sexuality is never stated in the story. These things were done purposefully by Diaz to show how the narrator may be confused with his sexuality. As seen in “Bros Before Hos”, it is the masculine ideal to be heterosexual. Homosexuality is seen as the insult towards men. “Bros Before Hos” gives the reader more of an insight into “Drown” as to why the narrator is mostly silent and refuses to thoroughly identify himself to the reader in order not be “abnormal, a f*cking pato” (Diaz 104). The word “pato” means the word “duck” in Latin America, but it can also be used as slang to insult a gay man. The protagonist knowing this shows the reader how much he resents wanting to be known as that. It is said that he was “terrified” (Diaz 104) of being called those things. This hints at the narrator being homosexual or at least bisexual and being not only uncomfortable with it, but also scared by the fact. It is clear that he is not the heterosexual he wants to

Open Document