British Mandate During Ww2 Essay

904 Words2 Pages

The British mandate in Palestine can be characterized as a form of colonialism, which sought to reconcile the competing, contradictory and incompatible interests of the British, Zionists and Palestinians. In summary it can be said that it is during this time that the British, in trying to satisfy all parties, not only made themselves hated by all involved parties, but failed at preventing the conflict from escalating into outright war. In many ways, the mandate’s failure was laid before it even began.

The mandate was destined to fail because of contradicting commitments Britain made during WWI. As explained in the documentary, Promises and Betrayals, Britain made three contradictory promises during the war. The first was Sykes-Picot, in which the British agreed to divide the Middle East between their own spheres of influence and control in Iraq and Palestine, and French influence and control in …show more content…

The McMahon-Hussein correspondence were the second promise, in which the British agreed to support Arab independence and unity in all Ottoman lands in the Middle East. This was promised in exchange for an Arab uprising against the Ottomans, which did in fact happen. The last of these promises was the Balfour declaration, in which the British promised the Zionist movement a national home in Palestine. All these agreements overlapped with regards to Palestine. The British took control over the territory after the war, but they still made promises to both Arabs and Zionists in the land. It’s clear that these promises were incompatible when one looks at British attempts to rectify both of them throughout the mandate.

The British mandate is a period in which Zionist immigration to Palestine was facilitated in order to fulfill the Balfour declaration. Dina Porat writes in her work, Forging

Open Document