Admitting to only befriending Perry because “he had beaten a colored man to death” (Capote 109) is evidence of the perverted mind of Dick, which discredits any notion of having good intentions behind any of his actions. Capote included this confession because if his judgment of character is based solely off of the ability to commit heinous crimes then there is not a whole lot of good light being shed upon his own character. Furthermore, Dick goes on to attack Perry in his mind thinking there’s “something wrong with Little Perry” (108). Since Capote has already attempted to establish a general liking and sympathy towards Perry, he hopes the reader will be close-minded towards Dick and dislike him more for being so rude.
Although they may not be “normal” people, they are human beings. He turned what people believed to be horrible, vial, grim, and desolate beasts into human beings who are unable to control how they act or feel. The expression, “never read a book by it’s cover” somewhat applies to the story of Dick and Perry. They were convicted killers who murdered an innocent family --- a crime no “human” could commit. So people automatically assumed they are not human; they must be beats. However, Capote uncovers their life stories to look deeper, and eventually one could see that Dick and Perry aren’t beast after all. Capote was able to humanize the beasts that everyone thought weren’t
Most people believe that everyone gets what they deserve. That all bad actions deserve consequences. To many, that is what the so-called “justice” system is for. Criminals are supposed to be punished by the law, but is it always fair to the criminals? What if one of those criminals had an awful life growing up and just was unable to stay out of trouble? It is just this question that Truman Capote addresses in his book, In Cold Blood. Throughout the book, Capote creates sympathy for Perry Smith while claiming the justice system is flawed in the way it punishes the wrong people.
shocked by the randomness and brutality of the act, in much the same way it was
In Cold Blood, a nonfiction novel by Truman Capote, follows the 1959 case of the Clutter family homicide. The Clutters are introduced as, what seems to be, the perfect American family in a close knit town that were believed to be the least likely of families to be murdered. As the case proceeds with the findings of the Clutters’ corpses, Dick and Perry, the murderers, soon flee to Mexico. There aren’t any leads for the case until Floyd Wells tells the police of Dick, who told Floyd that he would murder the family with Perry while Floyd and Dick shared a cell. By the time Floyd tells the police, Dick and Perry have returned back to the States and are quickly caught by the police when they
Any events that occur as a child can either have a good impact or a bad impact. Children often learn to cope with certain circumstances differently than adults. The insecurities of Truman Capote’s childhood are psychologically conveyed through the tragic events of In Cold Blood. According to William L. Nance, an associate professor of English, “Some knowledge of Capote’s early life is essential to an understanding of his work, for that work, even through In Cold Blood, bears the clear marks of his childhood” (133). Capote’s parents divorced when he was very young. All throughout his childhood, he moved from relative to relative who each lived in small southern towns. Capote himself even said that it was “the most insecure childhood I know of” (133). He often performed poorly in school although “ . . .Psychological tests proved that his Intelligence Quotient (IQ) was above genius level” (n.p.).
In Cold Blood is a novel written by Truman Capote in 1966. In Cold Blood is a true account of a multiple murder case that took place in Kansas in the 1950's. The book outlines a brutal murder case, but it shows the story from many perspectives, not just that of the law. Capote introduces you to the Clutter family, a well known, very hard working and loyal family to the community. The town of Holcomb is a small farming town. There is not much excitement in the town, and that is the way the people liked it. Everyone went to church and the community trusted each other, until the unthinkable happened. The town's most prominent family was killed. It is even worse when the only clues are two sets of boot tracks. Everyone in and around the town become scared because if such evil could be brought upon the best family known, what will happen to them? When Truman Capote wrote In Cold Blood, he wrote a masterpiece. When he wrote the book he developed the character Perry so that even after you watched him kill you feel sympathetic for him. He proves that you can even see some good in the worst of people. He does this by slowly developing Perry's character. He gave an in-depth view of Perry's world. He showed that Perry, although he had troubles in his life and sometimes had a total disregard for people's life he also respected the people. Perry felt bad for some of the people he met. He also was willing to forgive people.
Because what mostly goes through people’s minds when they hear or see that someone has murdered an innocent person is that they want them to get executed or they want something bad to happen to that murderer. Kind of like an eye for an eye. But in this book, after reading about the murderers Dick and especially Perry, and who they are, the reader kind of feels bad for them. Like you didn’t want them to die in the end. Almost all of the book is about them, mostly Perry, and the reader can kind of feel the same connection that Capote had towards
In the book In Cold Blood the people of Holcomb and other friends of the Clutter family are deeply affected by the murders. The people in the town perceive the Clutters as the family “least likely” in the world to be killed. Rejecting the idea that the killers were strangers, many of them become suspicious of everyone and anxious about their own safety in the company of their neighbors. According to Truman Capote, the author, it is the first time the community of this part of Kansas have had to undergo the “unique experience of distrusting each other” (page 88).
Capote's structure in In Cold Blood is a subject that deserves discussion. The book is told from two alternating perspectives, that of the Clutter family who are the victims, and that of the two murderers, Dick Hickock and Perry Smith. The different perspectives allow the reader to relive both sides of the story; Capote presents them without bias. Capote masterfully utilizes the third person omniscient point of view to express the two perspectives. The non-chronological sequencing of some events emphasizes key scenes.
In the book in Cold Blood Dick Hickock is a good example of the nature debate presented in Capote's novel. Mr Hickock was one who was brought up in a good family, with parents who loved and cared him. It is mentioned a couple several times that he was talented and gifted in sports and his parents loved him very much. There doesn't seem to be anything wrong with his childhood, but he grows up to be an cold-hearted killer and criminal. After Dick Hickock was told he wouldn’t be able to attend college his whole world flipped upside down. Mr. Hickock said when he was talking to agent Nye says, “I guess Dick resented it, not getting to go to college” (166). In the story clearly states Dick wanted to go to college so badly, that when he didn’t
In Cold Blood by Truman Capote features Perry Smith. A tragic character who was recently released from prison after murdering an African-American. Aside from having a troubled pass, Perry has a very troubled and conflicted present. In this passage on page 21, Perry is described as a stocky man with scars that riddled his legs. A tattoo of a snake hugging a dagger adorns his chest and a tiger lay on his bicep.
Truman Capote put-to-words a captivating tale of two monsters who committed four murders in cold blood. However, despite their atrocities, Capote still managed to sway his readers into a mood of compassion. Although, his tone may have transformed several times throughout the book, his overall purpose never altered.
and at one point, had a gun pointed to his head. Also there appears to be
Truman Capote’s non-fiction novel, In Cold Blood, was a breakthrough in literacy in that it was accredited as the first non-fiction novel. There was a lot of controversy when the book was first published because of the incredibility of the work. This could be expected in that time, because people where not familiar with the concept of non-fiction novels yet, but this is where the beauty of this style of writing lies, the recreation of the truth. It would have been impossible for Capote to have documented the occurrence fully, because he only read about the murder after it had happen, after all, this was not what he wanted to do. Capote got a lot of criticism for the book, because of him bending the truth, putting in scenes that never happened and his ways of gathering information, but people still saw the talent that went into creating the non-fiction novel. Truman Capote will forever be recognized for this novel and the contribution he made to literacy. In this essay we will be discussing the strengths and weaknesses of In Cold Blood when it delivers facts and the credibility of the work. We will also be discussing the strengths and weaknesses of the novel when Capote bends reality and ad some parts of fiction.