Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of the movie taken
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis of the movie taken
Earlier this year, the third installment of the Taken series made its way into theaters. In the movie, Brian Mills, once again portrayed by Liam Neeson, finds himself in yet another terrible predicament when it comes to his family. Particularly his ex-wife, Lenore, this time. After the sudden death of his ex-wife, Brian Mills is framed for her death. With the police on his tail, Brian is forced to go on the run while also look for her killer. Since the release of the first Taken film, Liam Neeson has been recognized as an action star and he has done a great job at it. However, with the main plot of the film series completely forgotten, lack of creativity, dull action sequences, and seemingly purposeless character, Taken 3 is not that exciting …show more content…
I did have some hope when seeing Whitaker, however some of his scenes did not really do the movie any good or help it either. In some of his scenes, his character, Inspector Franck Dotzier, is seen contemplating the case while eating bagels, playing with a rubber band on his wrist, or fiddling with chess piece. All three of which appear as awkward, but really only one proves to be useful. While his character is recognized as intelligent by Mills, it is not all that apparent throughout the film except twice. Once in the beginning, when Brian flees from the police, he manages to escape undetected from a seemingly locked down garage with no one being the wiser. Dotzier figures out there is a passage beneath the truck that Brian used. The second time also proves his intelligence and explains his useful obsession with bagels from a couple of his scenes. He states that he knew Brian was innocent because the bagels in his apartment were still warm the day Lenore was killed. Brian could not have bought the bagels and then kill her. Aside from needing someone to lead the investigation, Dotzier’s role seems more purposeless than not. The role honestly did not match an actor of Forest Whitaker’s
Unfortunately, any expectations that I had about Julian Bond giving a high-powered, energetic
No one could have played Rex better than Woody Harrelson. The director did a respectable job of casting people who would have looked like the author described them in the book. Overall, the movie did a fantastic job of portraying the major events and showing the overall theme of the book. Watching the movie, you notice a few differences. For example, Lori has glasses on and in the book, she did not get glasses until later in the story.
One of the most interesting choices of the movie is how Joseph McCarthy’s impact on America is portrayed. For one, Clooney did not cast anyone to play the role of Senator McCarthy.
In Manohla Dargis’s movie review she said that “She’s always been better in fundamentally independent roles that allow her to grab the wheel.” In The Proposal Margret is a very opinionated business woman focused on herself. Unfortunately her acting and Ryan Reynold’s acting did not seem as realistic as it should have. While their acting in the plot was believable the acting for the movie was less so. In contrast, in The Blind Side, Sandra Bullock, as well as the other actors fit in the roles very well. The southern accents and the strong personalities made for a believable story. It kept me entertained and kept me “choking up, chuckling with warm laughter… and so gratified” as A. O Scott
The film’s portrayal of the characters display an accurate representation of Cal, however lacks depth of some other major characters in the book. James Dean’s portrayal of Cal Trask brings his character to life through his acting and exchanges with other characters.
When the announcement was made that Tom Cruise would star as Lestat, I had deep reservations and severe criticisms. So did many many of my readers. I talked openly about this. A curtain thereafter divided me from the entire production, and with reason. Nobody likes to be criticized, and that includes movie people, too.
Although Channing Tatum did an excellent job on his role the real Mark Schultz said that he has been wrongfully portrayed in the movie, especially with the rumors of there being a sexual relationship between him and John E. du Pont, for which he went online and threatened Bennett Miller.
He had a strong supporting cast this time around. While Ms Moore’s character worked with an autistic child, and a stuttering child among others, Elvis’s character became more enamored with her. Presley’s John Carpenter has the easy job, while Moore’s Michelle has a lot to think about when it comes to her vocation and her feelings for the good doctor.
film was much too serious and I did not like the factor that most of the
... He really sold the part and did the part justice. Furthermore in the beginning of the flashback I had no idea who the main character was, but Christian developed the character subtly yet effectively.
All characters in the movie were played well by the actors in my opinion. They
... They played their parts quite differently, they spoke differently, looked different, and their body language was different too. The character cast was appropriate for their parts as they had sounded like they were different people as compared to their first casting.
“Life is like a box of chocolates. You never know what you’re gonna get.” In this film however, when you see Tom Hanks as Forrest and Robin Wright as Jenny, you know you are going to get more than a few laughs and more than a few tears out of this film. In fact, Tom Hanks is probably the only actor who could have played this role as Forrest. Hanks makes Forrest to be a dignified person and so straight-forward. The way he plays Forrest Gump is so breathtaking. This film is not about a mentally retarded man. This movie is a movie of meditation on our times. The movie is seen through the eyes of a man, Forrest, who has no common sense and takes things exactly as they are. After watching the film, the viewer can now understand why some people get criticized or made fun of for being “too clever by half.” Forrest, in this movie, has just the right amount of cleverness to make things ...
He looks scary, evil and uneasy. Just by looking at him, you knew he was the antagonist. The way that most of the actors communicated within the movie made you get goose bumps. Some of the supporting actors in the movie included Ed Tom Bell (played by Tommy Lee Jones), the sheriff of Sanderson, and Carson Wells (Woody Harrelson), a hit man hired to eliminate Chigurh. When these two characters came on the screen, you felt a lack comfortableness.
The central character in this film is Bryan Mills, played by Liam Neeson. His daughter, Kim Mills, is played by Maggie Grace. Although having limited camera exposure, she is the main driving force behind her father’s actions. Bryan’s ex-wife Lenore, and her husband Stuart contribute supporting roles which add to the excitement of the film. Amanda, Kim’s friend, played by Katie Cassidy has a short-lived role that provides a valuable part to the film.