Bloody Marsh Battle Analysis

430 Words1 Page

Straying from the original vision announced by King Henry and James Oglethorpe, the first colonist of Georgia faced harsh realities when they arrived. Proposed in the charter were aspects of charity, economics, and defense. James Oglethorpe wanted Georgia to be a “haven” for the working poor, debtors, and former prisoners, but King Henry did not allow that. Also not allowed to come were liquor dealers, lawyers, blacks, and Catholics. Instead, people with special sets of skills were recruited. Those who came were supplied with tools, food for a year, and 50 acres of land. Oglethorpe's plan for the new colony failed because of the strict restrictions on who could come to the new colony. “King Henry overruled Oglethorpe...debtors were not allowed to come (Packet, Prison Reform).” …show more content…

There was a small problem though. The people who were came to Georgia were skilled businessmen, not fighters. Thankfully, this was soon realized and a group of, “the world's finest fighting soldiers specially selected by Ogelthorpe (Packet, Highland Scots)” named the Highland Scots were recruited to help defend against the threats from hostile Indians and from Spain. Before long, the colonist were taught how to fight and Fort Frederica was build for a stronger defense. The Battle of Bloody Marsh displayed the importance of a strong defense when the Georgia colonist and Highland Scots defeated the Spanish, letting Georgia stay a colony of England. Even with many of the improvements to security, the capturing of St. Augustine still failed. It is safe to say that because of the Highland Scots, Georgia got to live out its original expectations as a defensive

Open Document