Bismarck Napoleon III and the Outbreak of the Franco-Prussian War

872 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The role of Bismarck in the unification of Germany

Bismarck Napoleon III and the Outbreak of the Franco-Prussian War

Bismarck, Napoleon III, and the Outbreak of the Franco-Prussian War

The unification of Germany threw all of Europe off its axis. With the formation of this new power there were now five major powers instead of four. This would work to unsettle age-old alliances and confuse the entire European continent for more than twenty years. Not least among the nations swept of their proverbial feet was France. France was a rival with the German alliance long before it merged into one state, but the new stability of a unified Germany made it a much more powerful entity. France scrambled to try and establish a sense of security, immediately demanding compensation in the form of the Rhine’s west bank and Belgium, which Bismarck quickly denied (Howard 40). It became quickly obvious that these two nations would be forced to a flashpoint and soon. As France feared for her safety, Germany feared as well. The recent revolutions and social upheavals in the Republic were not soon forgotten and Germany wanted to be safe from the possible flack that could be thrown her way by another such occurrence. Thus, Germany set her eye on recapturing the lands of Alsace and Lorraine from which Napoleon the Great had snatched decades before. No person worked harder at trying to cause war with France than German Chief of Staff Carl Moltke. He saw France as the “hereditary foe” (Hwd 41) and desired nothing more than to see her lose all of her ability to wage war on Germany. He begged often of Bismarck to go to war with their neighbor and drew up plans to do so. Finally, in 1866, with the building of four additional rail lines (Hwd 43) in Germany, Moltke was able to begin planning his attack. ...

... middle of paper ...

...h small misunderstandings and a little bit of conniving. If warring parties would actually sit at the table and listen to each other and be honest, war could probably be averted nine times out of ten. However, as in Bismarck’s case, things are usually much more complicated. That old devil.

Bibliography:

Bibliography:Corley, T.A.B., Democratic Despot A Life of Napoleon III. 1961. Barrie & Rockliff, London.Guerard, Albert, Napoleon III A Great Life in Brief. 1966. Alfred A Knopf, New York.Kent, George O., Bismarck and His Times. 1978. Southen Illinois University Press, Carbondale.Howard, Michael, The Franco-Prussian War The German Invasion of France. 1962. The MacMillian Company, New York.Maurice, General J.F., The Franco-German War. 1900. Swan Sonnenschein and Co., Lim., London.Sempell, Charlotte, Otto von Bismarck. 1972. Twayne Publishers, Inc., New York

Show More
Related

  • The Treaty of Versailles as a Cause of WWII

    957 Words  | 2 Pages

    This ensured that Germany would not have support from the smaller countries in Europe (Document B). Belgium had aligned itself with France previously, and it continued to do so, but Czechoslovakia and Poland joined in the new alliance (Document B).... ... middle of paper ... ...

    Read More

  • Comparing Napoleon III And Bismarck

    341 Words  | 1 Pages

    Napoleon III and Bismarck are similar in the way they employed the idea of Realpolitik when making decisions in that they both switched back and forth from liberal to conservative agendas in order to gain more power. After the National Assembly denied him of being able to stand for reelection and revise the Constitution, Napoleon III seized control of the government through the use of troops, showing that he is willing to do whatever it takes to have power. Napoleon III also managed to switch from liberal to conservative ideals depending on which one benefited him. For example, he advocated a legislative body that would be elected by universal male suffrage to appeal to the growing liberalists in France. On the other hand, once he was reelected,

    Read More

  • Rebmann

    1224 Words  | 3 Pages

    ... defeat the German Army, the French had to create strategies on how they were going to accomplish a victory over the German Army. World War I also brought new technology that would assist the men involved in the battle. A variety of new weapons were introduced to the French and German armies during the Battle of Verdun. One of the newest weapons was Diphosgene gas. Diphosgene was used to harm a large amount of people at once. It is a poisonous gas first introduced in World War I because of the effects. Henri Philippe-Petain possessed a huge quantity of supplies. Being prepared for the war was vital to the troops. They had to be aware of their surroundings while in combat and always have weapons handy because of the fear of a surprise attack. In addition, the strategies and new technology used by French were significant in the victory over the Germans in world war I.

    Read More

  • Why Did Germany Caused World War I?

    340 Words  | 1 Pages

    Although Fischer’s thesis was widely accepted, there were people who argued against it. Most Germans had accepted the fact that Germany had caused World War II, but they disagreed with the blame Germany took for World War I. World War I was widely regarded as a war forced upon Germany by its encircling enemies. Critics argue that Fischer’s thesis placed Germany outside the real historical context. It is argued that Germany was not the only aggressive a European nation in the early 20th century, as it was a time when Social Darwinism views of struggle were well-known in Europe's ruling classes. Critics also oppose that in the centuries following Columbus's voyages to America, the Western European countries had already acquired vast overseas colonial

    Read More

  • Napoleon - an enlightened despot

    1003 Words  | 3 Pages

    Kreis, Steven. “Europe and the Superior Being: Napoleon.” The History Guide: Lectures on Modern European Intellectual History. 13 May. 2004. 6 Dec. 2004.

    Read More

  • Otto Von Bismarck's Rise Of Imperialism

    1798 Words  | 4 Pages

    However, with the designation of Wilhelm II as the new Kaiser, Bismarck’s ways and goals weren’t longer taken into account and was dismissed in 1890. The new Kaiser had different objectives; he was ambitious and wanted to improve the notability of Germany by expanding the empire. This expansion involved more colonies from where they would be able to import cheaply raw materials and labour supply. The whole new tendency whose sole purpose was to expand was named Weltpolitik. This Imperialism was one of the many causes of WW...

    Read More

  • France and the Spanish Civil War

    1358 Words  | 3 Pages

    During the Spanish Civil War, France decided on a policy of Non-Intervention in order to promote economic and political stability. Firstly, the Non-Intervention policy kept France from having a financial stake in the war, which they would have should they have supported one side over the other, and was in fact financially beneficial as it allowed France to trade with both sides of the Spanish Civil War without difficulties. In addition, since France itself was very divided on which side to support in the war, following a policy of Non-Intervention kept the peace in France and stopped them from having their own civil war. Politically, Britain was also putting a lot of pressure on France to not interfere in the war, and because France needed Britain as an ally in the face of the threat of Germany, Italy, and Russia, they yielded to their demand. Most importantly, France hoped that following the policy of Non-Intervention would to keep world peace. Europe’s political climate was very fragile and tense at this moment, and much of Europe, France included, was worrying about another World War breaking out, with the Spanish Civil War as the trigger.

    Read More

  • Analysis of The Origins of Second World War by A.J.P. Taylor

    960 Words  | 2 Pages

    middle of paper ... ... It was easy for him to threaten, and hard for him to conciliate.” (pg. 216) Finally, Taylor explains, after Britain’s failure to help reach an agreement, the aggression dragged both France and Britain into war with Germany. Taylor’s perspective on the origins of the Second World War, although controversial, is not one so easily dismissed.

    Read More

  • The Battle of France

    2520 Words  | 6 Pages

    Hitler had long been obsessed with attacking and controlling France. After their defeat in World War I, the German people, government, and military were humiliated by the enormous post war sanctions leveraged against them from the Treaty of Versailles. Hitler wanted to defeat and humiliate the French people in the same way that his country had to. For him, revenge was necessary. The German plan was to swing into France using a new tactic known as Blitzkrieg or “Lightning War”.

    Read More

  • The Treaty Of Versailles: The Written Agreement Of Versailles

    2785 Words  | 6 Pages

    ...eaknesses to win their loyalty. Finally, the written agreement of Versailles was purported to represent the peaceful ending to warfare I, however, it became the prelude to a different war. it had been originally an attempt to revive order and supply a peaceful conclusion to warfare I. The sick feelings and economic upheaval that resulted provided the proper climate for Hitler's dominance, in post-war FRG. The contributor’s participants of Versailles had alternative motives behind the peace agreement apart from a peace settlement. Their stingy actions resulted in not solely the economic hardship of FRG, however inflation and state altogether of Europe. The severity of the reparations contained during this document set the stage for history to repeat itself. Therefore the terribly method within which the written agreement of Versailles was forced on the German people.

    Read More

  • Causes of the Franco-Russian Alliance

    937 Words  | 2 Pages

    France aimed to get revenge on Germany for the Franco - Prussian war of 1970 - 1971 where France were disastrously defeated, Germany aimed to stay free from an invasion from France and keep Austria-Hungary happy as France and Austria- Hungary were on either side of German, and Russia wanted an ally so it could feel safe form Germany.

    Read More

  • The Truth Behind The Holocaust

    1675 Words  | 4 Pages

    Faced with harsh peace terms at the end of World War I, Germany was put in the perfect position for extreme political turmoil to rise, along with the need to place the blame for the German defeat. The Treaty of Versailles, which was the Allies’ peace treaty with Germany following World War I, “... took territories from Germany in the east and west, destroyed the Austro-Hungarian Empire, humiliated Germans by including a “war guilt” clause, imposed disarmament, and demanded heavy reparation payments for war damage” (Weisser). This “peace” treaty, littered with bitter terms for Germany, did great harm to the nation. Germany was not only stripped of its once powerful nation by depriving it of its territories and armaments; but also by the destruction of its economy through hyperinflation, a result of printing more money in order to pay reparations. This treaty therefore ruined Germany, putting it in an atrocious state, which would eventually allow for dramatic political change and the placing of blame for the...

    Read More

  • Strategies of World War One

    533 Words  | 2 Pages

    Plan 17 was a great setback for France and did not help them succeed at the beginning of the war because of the soldiers they lost and it’s outcome that resulted in failure. Plan 17 was done in August of 1918 and it consisted of an advance by four French Armies into Alsace and Lorraine on either side of the Metz-Thionville fortresses, occupied by the Germans since 1871. The southern wing of the invasion forces would first capture Alsace and Lorraine, in that order, while the northern wing would, depending upon German movements, advance into Germany via the southern Ardennes forests, or else move north-east into Luxembourg and Belgium (Godl). The French were quickly repelled by German armies and their pursuit to conquer Alsace and Lorraine was not successful. “It is clearly evident that the French were oblivious to the gigantic German offensive that was being aimed at their left (northern) wing. Plan XVII gravely underestimated the strength that the Germans would deploy against France.” (Royde-...

    Read More

  • The Effect of Leadership on the Definiton of Total War

    2342 Words  | 5 Pages

    Because the leaders and commanders of WWI forever changed the nature of war, it influenced the later Nazi leaders decisions, and forced the next set of Allies to adapt to an entirely new concept of total war as i...

    Read More

  • The Paris Peace Treaties

    1636 Words  | 4 Pages

    Conclusively, the writers and founders of the Paris Peace Treaties, despite their efforts to bring a lasting peace to the world, made a variance of unforeseen mistakes in their toil. For the uncountable amounts of varying ethnic groups could not be easily separated without annoying at least someone- and since the Central powers were the losers, logic suggested that it would be them. Secondly, France’s increasing insecurity towards Germany that dated back decades caused for it to demand Germany to be paralyzed forever. This as well as other forms of Allied punishments caused for increased Central power animosity towards the Allied powers. Therefore, the intent of peace treaties was well intentioned initially, and the criticism of them was undeserved in that there was nothing that anyone could do else without the impossible of power seeing into the future

    Read More

More about Bismarck Napoleon III and the Outbreak of the Franco-Prussian War

Open Document