Big Fish Movie And Book Comparison

736 Words2 Pages

In the novel Big Fish by Daniel Wallace, we are told the story of Edward Bloom, a man of many adventures, who is somewhat of a myth. Big Fish is a collection of the tall tales Edward tells his son about his life, and also of the effect his tales had on his son. The novel comes from an American author from Alabama, while the movie comes from Hollywood and is directed by Tim Burton, who is also American. This story is not an ancient sacred text, so the story’s function(s) is to entertain and to make money.
A hero is defined by Joseph Campbell as someone who gives their life to something bigger than themselves. Edward is a willing hero. “ He was a big fish”(Big Fish Wallace page 12). Edward was meant for great things and was well aware of that. …show more content…

This one simple statement brings Edward’s greater goal back home to his son. This is why his call to adventure is Will’s birth even though Edward believes his adventure started long before. The film begins with Will’s wedding and Edward is telling the story of Will’s birth. This is different from the novel but really helps with the monomyth chronology. In the film Karl the giant is Edward’s first helper. Karl is who Edward leaves Ashton with and helps Edward meet his wife. This however is out of order because Edward meets Karl long before his son is born. In the novel Edward doesn’t really have a helper because Karl doesn’t serve the same purpose. Edward takes many tests, and everytime he makes it out alive he passes. This, like most of the parts of this hero quest, happen before his son is born. The boon is Edward’s stories and his adventures. It’s the things that his relationship with his son are built off of. In the movie, Will constantly complains that he doesn’t know his father because Edward has never told him a fact about himself. At the end of the film, Will realises that his father’s stories were who he was, and he knew Edward all along. In the

Open Document