Strategic Project Management

767 Words2 Pages

Nowadays due to competition, economic pressure and mostly rapid technology changes, better ways to manage projects are being researched. Many projects are still managed ineffectively but a new trend called strategic project management is on the rise within the discipline of project management. The general idea about strategic project management is that project management teams must learn how to satisfy the business aspect of their project and support their company’s business strategy and sustainability while considering the time, budget and operational goals. Even though this approach is gaining popularity it has not become explicit in project implementation. The main aim of this paper is to provide a full definition and implementation of the …show more content…

- Guidelines or Plan (“How”): This is how the objectives and the competitive advantage are going to be achieved and it includes project definition and strategic focus. To test this concept, a research was conducted on on-going projects; the first was a case study focusing on the dynamics of single projects and the findings were used to build theories. Interviews including the project manager, team members, customers, and executives were carried out and the data were also collected from the project organization, managerial procedures, planning and control methods, design practices, software packages, and documentation. Finally, data were also collected on decision-making processes, information flow, and communication patterns. In the second phase of this research, an action research was carried out. An initial project strategy framework was introduced to the teams who participated in the case study by involving them in actively creating and assessing the validity and applicability of the framework for their projects. Teams were allowed to make modifications in the framework to better fit their …show more content…

Many project managers deal with certain issues based on their own intuition or their companies' needs. With the lack of formal guidelines on project strategy, many project teams are using their own version of strategy and most elements were used in an informal or implicit way. In the action research phase, project teams quickly adopted the framework introduced to them and found it easy for planning and guiding the rest of the project execution. It was found straightforward, and teams were comfortable using them although one modification was made after this phase. Originally, the project strategy framework included seven parts but project teams revealed that the “competitive advantage” part should be split into two. All the projects that were studied found the framework of project strategy useful for updating their project plans and continued to refer to it during the rest of the project execution. More importantly, they recognized the value of using a strategic approach alongside with the traditional methods that were formally applied when they started the project. The framework tested seems to be consistent with project and organizational needs and teams were able to apply it and work with it throughout the remainder of the project. Project strategy has still not become an integral piece of most project plans and execution

Open Document