Better Is Not Always Best
Technology is not inherently good or evil. Its nature is determined by what man makes of it, as is the case in Machine Man, written by Max Berry. After an industrial accident where he loses a leg, Charles Neumann fabricates a prosthetic leg that is superior to his biological leg. Realizing that human biology is not as efficient as machines can be, he begins a project to use technology to improve human’s natural form. Charles becomes consumed by technology and essentially has his life taken away from him in an attempt to improve himself. A number of factors lead to the tragic conclusion, such as Charles’ ambition, his perfectionist personality, his relationships with others, and his belief in technology’s superiority
…show more content…
One example already mentioned is the plant in Charles’ laboratory. Charles’ belief is demonstrated when he says, “I wondered when that had happened; that we had started making better machines than people” (59). Now the reader has entered a science fiction world outside of reality. Within this world is the recurring idea that technology has advanced so far that it is now superior to actual humans and their biological properties. Charles’ group of laboratory assistants all have the same ideology: fix biology with technology. After Charles' triumphant return from the hospital following the loss of his second leg, funding pours in for his projects and he is provided with dozens of laboratory assistants to further explore the possibilities of improving the body. The first invention from the laboratory is the Z-specs. Charles observes, “My assistants began wearing chunky glasses. They looked ridiculous.” (93) Visual appeal has become irrelevant. The only thing that matters is function. The second invention is the Better Skin, a product that makes skin more appealing. Cassandra Cautery, a manager at Better Future, the military research company where Charles works, refers to Better Skin as “not fair,” and says, “It’s like worlds colliding” (136). Cassandra thought her looks were special and unique and takes offense that the laboratory assistants are able to …show more content…
Not just humanity in the sense of physical characteristics, but Charles’ erosion of human emotion and perception. Without analysis one would think that as Charles loses his limbs he becomes less and less human. But in fact the opposite occurs. He begins to feel natural emotions in the presence of Lola and stops thinking about life and feelings so objectively. When he goes to visit Lola one morning he says, “Her legs were very beautiful. You had to give it to biology sometimes” (161). This gives evidence of Charles becoming more attracted to natural form even after he has sacrificed so much to being a machine. The human relationship with Lola makes him more susceptible to not being so engulfed in his work. But because of the impulse to be a machine he has given up the right to live an ordinary life. He eventually becomes more machine than man, and is forced to rely on his new technological body parts to survive. The fight for survival is shown when Charles weeps after being presented with the idea of living without his mechanical body. “There is no getting rid of the parts. I am the parts” (256). The tragedy is that Charles has found something worth living for, but is unable to live because he has been diminished down to nothing more than a box with a
Throughout The Body Project the reader is able to realize more and more about girls obsessions with self-image. As the process of menarche that transitions a child into a young woman begins and their bodies become more visible and exposed, so do the problems of becoming a young adult. Having perfect clear skin wasn’t always an epidemic for young adolescents. The desire to be beautiful was not always a priority and of the many body projects talked about by Brumberg, skin care was really the first to be supported by middle class parents. Having clear skin was of great social and cultural trend of the time. During this era when blemishes indicated to society that acne was a sign of poverty and uncleanliness, as well as displayed signs of promiscuous sexual behavior mothers did everything in their power to make su...
The robots are taking over!!! This is the idea that Kevin Kelly stresses and elaborates on in his article “Better than Human:Why Robots Will-and must-Take Our Jobs”. The article focuses on automation in the workplace and how most of the jobs that are currently done by humans will be taken over by robots in the future. Kelly believes that this is inevitable and that it is a positive thing. While I believe that most of our jobs will be taken over in the future, I do not think that Kelly did a great job at trying to prove his point and his argument was mediocre.
Technology is neither good nor evil until put in the hands of humans. In “Harrison Bergeron” by Kurt Vonnegut Jr. a young fourteen year-old boy tries to overthrow the government. While taking over a television broadcast, he tries to free the citizens from their handicaps that were placed on them by the law. “The Pedestrian” by Ray Bradbury, shows Leonard Mead walking alone through the streets of a computerized city and after a while is arrested by an unmanned police car. Government regulated media and technological handicaps made to hinder abilities in “Harrison Bergeron” and the overuse of technology in “The Pedestrian” shows that if used incorrectly, technology could misguide society and have terrible ramifications.
Many people change their position on this overarching question: What responsibility do people have when developing new technology? In the texts “Frankenstein” by Mary Shelley, “the Immortal life of Henrietta Lacks” by Rebecca Skloot, and “De-Extinction” answers the questions that it may impose. Each of these texts share one same belief: Society holds heavy responsibility towards technological advancements. Throughout the article, she talks about how the HeLa helped create cures for various diseases, and how groundbreaking they are.
Victor’s determination of creating “life” made him ignorant of properly preparing for how to control his creation. Victor became increasingly immersed in his research, spending “days and nights of incredible labour and fatigue” working towards his goal of “bestowing animation upon lifeless matter” (38). Victor did not think about nor concern himself with anything besides his work, for he was deeply engrossed in his occupation (42). As he became more disillusioned with the thought of bringing life to a motionless figure, he did not ponder what his actions should be after his experiment was complete. Once his creature had been b...
They range from the most simplistic realizations of the difference between acid and water to the principle that Earth is not the center of the Universe. Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein depicts this very difference in the story of Victor Frankenstein. A scientist who, through performing his experiments, creates a monster which wreaks havoc upon humanity. Frankenstein, concentrating wholly upon discovery, ignores the consequences of his actions. Victor Frankenstein often esteemed himself as a scientist of nature, in contrast to those of his time who were alchemists.
Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein, or the Modern Prometheus, explores the monstrous and destructive affects of obsession, guilt, fate, and man’s attempt to control nature. Victor Frankenstein, the novel’s protagonist and antihero, attempts to transcend the barriers of scientific knowledge and application in creating a life. His determination in bringing to life a dead body consequently renders him ill, both mentally and physically. His endeavors alone consume all his time and effort until he becomes fixated on his success. The reason for his success is perhaps to be considered the greatest scientist ever known, but in his obsessive toil, he loses sight of the ethical motivation of science. His production would ultimately grieve him throughout his life, and the consequences of his undertaking would prove disastrous and deadly. Frankenstein illustrates the creation of a monster both literally and figuratively, and sheds light on the dangers of man’s desire to play God.
When you look at yourself in the mirror, probably, you are wondering what is human nature, how does it affect us? We all say that men’s nature at birth is good. But the truth is we realize more and more darkness of humanity along with we grow up, and that changes us inattentively. Today, I would like to present human nature base on the transition of Charlie who is the main character in Craig Silvey’s ‘Jasper Jones’.
In Han Kang’s, Human Acts there are several highly graphic and shocking descriptions of the human body that beg the readers to problematize and question what it means to be humanized. Throughout her novel there are several instances where humans are being referred to as bloodied, convulsing, animal like sacks being thrown around without purpose and such descriptions may be interpreted by some readers as clearly dehumanizing. However, even though such wording may elicit such a response, the text is in fact humanizing the characters being killed and tossed by so accurately describing the human condition and all of the things the body does strictly because following trauma, living as ghosts because humans feel and react.
Victor Frankenstein finds himself exploring the world of science against his fathers wishes but he has an impulse to go forward in his education through university. During this time any form of science was little in knowledge especially the chemistry which was Victors area if study. Victor pursues to go farther than the normal human limits of society. “Learn from me, if not by my precepts, at least by my example, how dangerous is the acquirement of knowledge, and how much happier that man is who believes his native town to be the world, than he who aspires to become greater than his nature will allow” (Chapter 4). He soon finds the answer he was looking for, the answer of life. He becomes obsessed with creating a human being. With his knowledge he believes it should be a perfe...
Victor Frankenstein, the monster’s creator, is the victim of his own pride. An ego unchecked is a dangerous thing. But in truth, it really just shows Victor’s humanity. He is privileged, educated, talented, loved, adored, but he is not perfect. His flaw is his own ego and pride. Without doubt, this is the result of a childhood where he was overindulged. Overindulged to the extent he was given a little girl “Elizabeth” as a “present”, whom he considered from childhood “mine only” (Shelley 21). Little wonder the twenty year old Victor would think he could create, control and command life. But Victor as with any indulged child did not take the time to learn much from his parents about parenting and fath...
In George Herbert’s Man, Herbert gives homage to God, and the centrality of man. The main point of the poem assumes that since God is the greatest being of all, and God created humanity, then human beings are great as well - greater than credit is given. It focuses on the concept that man is a microcosm, or a small-scale model of the world, and that every part of the body has a facet of the world of which it is equal.
As mentioned earlier, he goes back to Paris to try to save a former servant, no matter how naive the plan is. This showed his integrity and the intention to keep every promise no matter how much it cost him. He is also decidedly honest and upfront with the Manettes about his family and background. He wants to tell them right away but the doctor insists he waits until the wedding day. Even then, Charles is exceedingly frank and expresses regret over his connection to the aristocracy in France. Lastly, Charles is a person who accepts his fate and intends to face it bravely. This is shown in the fact that he would not let Sydney Carton trade places with him. Because of this, he has to be drugged in order for the trade to
First, women spend huge amounts of money to improve their looks. So here we are unable to escape the reality that we can never be flawless or blemish free; moreover, as long as women have the belief that all greatness de...
Technology can be conveyed as a necessary evil in our life today. It’s considered necessary because it can save lives, and make them easier. Yet it’s considered evil because it can destroy lives on a physical and mental aspect. The true question is does the good outway the bad? ‘Technology is a word used to collectively describe or portray the advancements, abilities, creations, undertaking, views, and knowledge of the human-kind”(https://www.academia.edu/346486/Technological_Advancements_and_Its_Impact_on_Humanity). Therefore it basically means that it progresses the human race. It connects us, conserves energy and produces goods, and it saves lives. How could it not be a good thing?