Barbara Frederickson Immune To Reality

897 Words2 Pages

In “Immune to Reality”, Daniel Gilbert asserts that unexplained events have a longer lasting a stronger emotional impact. This is because unexplained events are unusual and uncommon. When events are explained, the explanations lessen the emotional impact because it makes events seem more common rather than rare. This means that giving explanations for rare events such as finding honest love lessens the emotional impact because it makes it seem frequent. Thus, an explanation to honest love can actually weaken our ability to find honest love as it will make it seem less rare and more predictable. In “Selections From Love 2.0”, Barbara Frederickson offers a scientific explanation of what love is. She explains that love is a connection with another …show more content…

Frederickson offers a detailed explanation of love in “Selections From Love 2.0”. Frederickson states that “love is the essential nutrient that your cells crave: true positivity-charged connection with other living beings” (Frederickson 107). Essentially, this means that love is something that our bodies needs as it nourishes us and that love is a positive connection with a living thing. Additionally, Frederickson explains that love is not a special bond between loved ones or close friends but rather that love is a connection and bond with anyone. It is not exclusive to any person. This illustrates that love is not a rare but something that is very common between any individual. When there is a connection with someone, positive resonance is experienced in which our brains sync with someone else’s brain. This is when the brain mirrors another brain. Micro-moments of love are felt when we are in sync with another person which shows that experiencing love is common. Moreover, it is stated that “As you interact with one person after another, they

Open Document