BOETHIUS, AND THE VALUE OF NOBLE BIRTH

1260 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The Value Of Honour

Introduction
“For this is sure, and this is fixed by everlasting law”, Boethius writes “that naught which is brought to birth shall constant her abide”. In his Consolation of Philosophy, Anicius Manlius Severinus Boethius explains how fortune is just and favors all humans equally, because beneficence and adversity is spread arbitrarily to “mankind”. However, some people appear to be more fortunate than others. To be sure, Boethius was born into a medieval social class that possessed more privileges and advantages over non-nobles, because he was adopted by a “man of highest rank” and, for this reason, made famous (among the Roman elites) for the merits of his “forefathers”.
In order to explain the nature of nobility, Boethius describes his own biographical upbringing and argues that we should never act rightly for the sake of fame and office. I will analyze the idea of nobility in relation to fame and the idea of dignity in relation to positions of high office, then I will argue that nobility and dignity presuppose moral and aesthetic categories because Boethius ascribes a set of fundamental values to human dignity.

On the dignity and nobility of being human
Boethius stresses that what people want is different from what seems to be the best means to attain happiness; fame and office are regarded as the means for happiness by relating it to dignity and nobility. However, neither fame nor office grants the benefits people assume. For one thing, if it is the case that fame “creates merit”, then nobility is glorified and personal merits are ignored. Consequently, nobility means to be praised solely on the merits of one’s forefathers (as opposed to being actually noble) and yet people seek happiness in office and fame because t...

... middle of paper ...

...on works in unison as part of the “highborn race”. Boethius account of humanity emphasizes the dignity of human beings by ascribing a fundamental set of human values to each person.

Conclusion
The nature of nobility and dignity is contained in man’s role, given that we are bonded by common love: being a person means the dignity in relation to other men, for Boethius; mankind is the whole and love binds each person in unison. In the moral sense, we stand under the Kingdome of heaven (where the “wise judge of justice” dwells): man acts honorably for the sake of rewarding the good and mankind is the object of respect in moral life. In the aesthetic sense, if we pursue false goods, then we deviate from not understanding the beauty within use. The nobility and dignity of the human race determines human beings as human and distinguishes human beings from animals.

Show More
Related

  • Analysis Of 'Kissing Doesn' T Kill And Manuel Otero's Nobility Of Blood

    1306 Words  | 3 Pages

    A key part of the title of the poem, the word “blood” can be used as a motif in many works of literature as a representation of family, heritage, and background. All of these lend themselves to the division of people into groups of which they often cannot control the formation. The second half of the title is the term “nobility.” This word, by definition, implies that certain groups of people are inherently more privileged or morally competent than other groups of people. Combining these two elements of the title, we achieve a meaning that states that certain people, people of a certain “blood,” have a different level of “nobility,” or privilege, than others. The last three words of this poem are “entitlement of birth,” which encompasses this idea completely. The audience that the speaker of “Nobility of Blood” addresses regard themselves as the “moral majority,” a group of people who are inherently more moral and consequently do not suffer from the AIDS disease. This is yet another instance of how Ramos Otero points out the hypocrisy in the audience’s beliefs, since under the Christian faith, it is believed that God loves all His children, and everyone is equal under God. Similar to how Fury attempts to universalize the disease through her artwork’s high level of diversity, Ramos Otero wishes to point out flaws in the

    Read More

  • Comparison of Aristotle and Thomas Hobbes

    1039 Words  | 3 Pages

    The foremost difference between Aristotle and Hobbes, and in turn classical and modern political philosophies’, with regard to a good life and happiness is that of normative judgments about the good life. While Hobbes rejects normative judgments about the good life and discusses human actions without attributions of moral quality, Aristotle offers the exact opposite. In Ethics, Aristotle differentiates between good and evil actions along with what the best good, or summum bonum, for all humans while Hobbes approach argues that good and bad varies from one individual to another with good being the object of an individuals appetite or desire, and evil being an object of his hate and aversion. In addition, Aristotle makes it clear that individuals have an ultimate purpose—that of political animals—that they should strive to become through trial and error throughout their life. Hobbes on the other hand rejects the idea of life having an ultimate purpose, “for there is no such finis ultimus (utmost aim) nor summum bonum (greatest good) as is spoken of in the books of the old moral philosophers…Felicity is a continual progress of the desire, from one object to another, the attaining of the former being still but the way to the latter”. Hobbes defines felicity as the satisfaction of one’s passions as stated in Leviathan “continual success in obtaining those things which a man from time to time desireth, that is to say, continual prospering, is that men call felicity.

    Read More

  • On the Genealogy of Morality

    1185 Words  | 3 Pages

    ... noble morality (16). Furthermore, in contrast to the self-contentment of the noble morality, the slave’s lack of outward power led him to direct his power inwards, resulting in man’s first exploration of his inner life.

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Morality By Nietzsche

    1203 Words  | 3 Pages

    On the one hand, in order to endure the “pressure of existence,” qualities such as pity, patience, humility and compassion become commendable. In this sense, “slave morality is essentially a morality of utility,” as it promotes qualities that would comfort and placate those who are living in pain. In another sense however, these aforementioned qualities are revered because the people are afraid of one another. The nobles valued and maintained some of “the highest and strongest drives, [which can] drive the individual far above the average and the flats of the herd conscience, wreck the self-confidence of the community, its faith in itself, and it is as if its spine snapped.” Wishing to prevent any possible danger to the stability of the community, the virtues of the nobles, which elevate the individual over the community, are condemned as evil. Since everyone is in fear of each other, slave morality is used to ensure that no one tries to subjugate the

    Read More

  • An Analysis of Matt Ridley’s The Origins of Virtue

    968 Words  | 2 Pages

    Inwardly examining his own nature, man would prefer to see himself as a virtuously courageous being designed in the image of a divine supernatural force. Not to say that the true nature of man is a complete beast, he does posses, like many other creatures admirable traits. As author Matt Ridley examines the nature of man in his work The Origins of Virtue, both the selfish and altruistic sides of man are explored. Upon making an honest and accurate assessment of his character, it seems evident that man is not such a creature divinely set apart from the trappings of selfishness and immorality. Rather than put man at either extreme it seems more accurate to describe man as a creature whose tendency is to look out for himself first, as a means of survival.

    Read More

  • Aristotle Wins Ethically: A comparison between John Stuart Mill and Aristotle on happiness

    1260 Words  | 3 Pages

    Simply defined, happiness is the state of being happy. But, what exactly does it mean to “be happy?” Repeatedly, many philosophers and ideologists have proposed ideas about what happiness means and how one attains happiness. In this paper, I will argue that Aristotle’s conception of happiness is driven more in the eye of ethics than John Stuart Mill. First, looking at Mill’s unprincipled version of happiness, I will criticize the imperfections of his definition in relation to ethics. Next, I plan to identify Aristotle’s core values for happiness. According to Aristotle, happiness comes from virtue, whereas Mill believes happiness comes from pleasure and the absence of pain. Ethics are the moral principles that govern a person’s behavior which are driven by virtues - good traits of character. Thus, Aristotle focuses on three things, which I will outline in order to answer the question, “what does it mean to live a good life?” The first of which is the number one good in life is happiness. Secondly, there is a difference between moral virtues and intellectual virtues and lastly, leading a good life is a state of character. Personally and widely accepted, happiness is believed to be a true defining factor on leading a well intentioned, rational, and satisfactory life. However, it is important to note the ways in which one achieves their happiness, through the people and experiences to reach that state of being. In consequence, Aristotle’s focus on happiness presents a more arguable notion of “good character” and “rational.”

    Read More

  • Justice, Convention And Political Virtue In Aristophanes Clouds Analysis

    1691 Words  | 4 Pages

    154, 956). This indicates two main points. Firstly, it speaks to the dangers of a conventional wisdom that is unwise in so far as it lacks the ability to sort out its own contradictions and to truly consider how the relationship between conventional laws and justice is a very complex relationship that needs to be articulated and sorted out for all its contradictions. Secondly, it points to the emergence of a discourse of hazardous individualism that emerges largely as a direct consequence of a collectivized political virtue that emphasizes the importance of restrain and justice, yet is unable to show the benefits the individual may incur from such virtues. Perhaps, this second point is made better evident towards the latter end of the interchange between the speeches. Consider, for example, how the unjust speech is able to promise those who follow its teachings positive and immediate pleasures, namely “boys, women, wine, relishes…” (p. 156, line 1001). Now consider how the just speech, speaking two lines before, simply celebrates the “ancient education” for the ways in which it “pitches [the singing of the sons] to the harmony of the fathers” and for “beating and trashing” those who seek to make any “modulations” (p. 154, lines 967-970). Finally, all the just speech is able to promise those

    Read More

  • Evil Can Never Overcome Goodness- Illustrated in Boethius' Consolation of Philosophy

    1459 Words  | 3 Pages

    Despite Boethius’s initial resistance, Lady Philosophy shows that because Boethius did not own his wealth or position, he was subject to Fortune’s transitory...

    Read More

  • The Republic - Book 1 - Theme Of Justice

    2360 Words  | 5 Pages

    Out of the confrontation with Cephalus, Polemarchus, and Thrasymachus, Socrates emerges as a reflective individual searching for the rational foundation of morality and human excellence. The views presented by the three men are invalid and limited as they present a biased understanding of justice and require a re-examination of the terminology. The nature in which the faulty arguments are presented, leave the reader longing to search for the rational foundations of morality and human virtue.

    Read More

  • The Idea Of Women In Anne Hollander's Women As Dress

    1013 Words  | 3 Pages

    The unchanged splendor of their toilettes and the opulence of their flesh signified the social status and the monetary power of their fathers, husbands, or lovers, who amassed wealth but did not exhibit it.”

    Read More

  • Characteristics Of A Just Man In Plato's The Republic

    1607 Words  | 4 Pages

    These duties, which vary in accordance with the metal an individual possesses in his soul, are clearly outlined in Plato’s Myth of the Metals. Thus, a just man from the bronze class will possess different characteristics than a just man in the silver or gold classes. Despite these differences, both men may still be considered virtuous human beings. The most virtuous man, however, is an individual who possesses not only the qualities of his own class, but also those of the remaining two classes. For example, an individual from the gold class must certainly have a wise soul. However, if this individual is also appetitive and spirited like the individuals in the bronze and silver classes, then he is a most virtuous and just

    Read More

  • Is Virtue Sufficient for Happiness?

    705 Words  | 2 Pages

    There is much debate over the right path to happiness in life dating back to early civilization in the Roman Empire. Majority of people believe that happiness can only be achieved by material things such as; wealth, political power, fancy cars and so forth, whereas others believe that striving for pleasure and success ultimately yields happiness. Liberal education tends to take a conceptual approach to teaching the importance of virtues, whereas vocational studies tend to have a more practical approach. In “On Liberal and Vocational Studies,” Roman philosopher Seneca gives his own view of happiness and the importance of liberal studies in virtuous character of men. As a champion for living a virtuous life as opposed to materialism, Seneca’s remarks explain his arguments for virtue. Essentially, Seneca argues that men should not place emphasis on the things of this world arguing that happiness is not achieved by the possessions in one’s life, but by the way one lives their life.

    Read More

  • Masque Of The Red Death

    1223 Words  | 3 Pages

    The nobles may choose to be oblivious to the conspicuous truth, but time and death will always be irrepressible forces. Regardless of one’s power, wealth, and influence they cannot escape mortality; hence, death is the only prominent equalizer against the blindness of the nobility.

    Read More

  • Virtue and Happiness

    1466 Words  | 3 Pages

    Happiness is the goal of every human beings according to Aristotle, however what does happiness imply? It is in his attempt to define happiness and to find a way to attain it that Aristotle comes across the idea of virtue. It is thus necessary to explain the relationship between these two terms. I will start by defining the good and virtue and then clarify their close link with the argument of function, I will then go into more details in explaining the different ways in which they are closely related and finally I am going to give an account of the apparent contradiction in Book X which is a praise of the life of study.

    Read More

  • Aristotle's Theory of the Good Life

    961 Words  | 2 Pages

    Happiness can be viewed as wealth, honour, pleasure, or virtue. Aristotle believes that wealth is not happiness, because wealth is just an economic value, but can be used to gain some happiness; wealth is a means to further ends. The good life, according to Aristotle, is an end in itself. Similar to wealth, honour is not happiness because honour emphases on the individuals who honour in comparison to the honouree. Honour is external, but happiness is not. It has to do with how people perceive one another; the good life is intrinsic to the...

    Read More

More about BOETHIUS, AND THE VALUE OF NOBLE BIRTH

Open Document