More handpicked essays just for you.
Historical essays about the canadian charter of rights and freedoms
Canadian Charter of Rights
Historical essays about the canadian charter of rights and freedoms
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The legal systems around the globe vary in many aspects and all originate from some other system that may have existed. The culture of each country, or even area within a country, has some impact on the legal system itself. This paper will provide a brief description of each country using history and culture. It will also state what type of legal tradition is used by each perspective country. This paper will also attempt to describe how history, culture, and the legal tradition are applied to management of the justice system of each country. This paper will also analyze how culture may have impacted the development of three countries. These countries will be Australia, Canada, and the United States. This paper will also gaze into the last …show more content…
are all rich with history and the stories are grand stories of famine and prosperity, which all lead up to our present day legal societies. We all had to start somewhere, but for the purposes of this paper, there will be only a brief description of the history of each. Australia used to be inhabited by aboriginal people, but as the British started to arrive and colonized Australia these people slowly faded away into history. This began in 1788 when Britain sent criminals over to Australia for new penal colonies to be formed (Commonwealth Staff, n.d.). The colonization continued, and in 1901, the six Australian States that were formed, all from British colonists, formed one nation. The legal system was formed at the same time using the British legal system as a guideline. The foundation of the legal system is the Australian Constitution. The Constitution was developed by the people of Australia who voted for its implementation (Overview of the Australian legal system, n.d.). This system was based on statutory law, which was made by parliament, and common law, which is based on precedents or other cases of a similar …show more content…
These cases have impacted how the system works. Take the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms for example. This charter was tested in court in 1990. In 1990 the Supreme Court in Canada received the case of R. v. Sparrow. This was the first case that applied section 35 which recognized the aboriginal people. Sparrow was convicted for fishing with a drift net that was too long. The Supreme Court overturned his conviction stating that the Constitution Act provides a strong measure of protection for Aboriginal rights, and that any proposed government regulations that infringe on the exercise of those rights must be constitutionally justified (Joseph, 2014). Australia and the U.S. have had their share of cases when it comes to things such as this too. These types of cases, whether it is about Aboriginals, Africans, Chinese, or whatever have serious effects upon the legal system. Things change and need to continue to change as societies
It is the footstone for the actions that can practically protect legal rights of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. The most important thing is that the aim of it cannot be changed. It was established for the legal rights Aboriginal inhabitants possess. In the future, the government should have some powerful measures to both protect Aboriginal people and resource companies. Contradictions between economy and citizens should be reconciled instead of being intensified. Also, a more regulated process of native title is supposed to be introduced. The Australian Government announced $7.8 million additional funding to support native title groups (Indigenous.gov.au, 2017). More financial compensation should be applied to Aboriginal people.
The roots of Australian laws are similar to traditional Aboriginal laws, dating back to before the Norman Conquest in 1066, where each separate village had their own laws developed to their own customs. This changed however, after a centralized legal system was established after 1066. A common law was formed, that applied to all of England. This was later combined with equity law and mercantile law, which is the basis of Australian law today, known as ‘statute law’.
Since the dawn of time for a society to work it needs to have a level of structure that applies to everyone and is understood by everyone. Australian legal system is broad and complex. It is the nature of the encompassing laws and regulations which reflect how people, organisations and governments behave on the many different levels of operation and these are created to make sure that everyone understands their rights and obligations. There are two sources of Law in Australia: Statute Law regulated by Parliament and comprise of legislations and acts; and Judge-made Law or Common Law where decisions made by judges are based on previous cases.
Legal system is a comprehensive term that is used to confirm the existence of the law; it also explains the law-making process and how this is enforced on everyone. The Australian legal system regulates all level of governments, organisations, and all people whether they are Australian born or have migrated here, and they must obey Australia’s regulations. The legal system here was developed from the United Kingdom’s legal system, as Australia was a colony of the British. At a glance, the British government granted restricted rights to their colonies, including Australia to set local government system. This was intended to developed laws in local area, also to deal with specific situation at that time. As a result, the legal system in each of the colonies started to develop separately. According to Carvan J (2010) the Australian law is adopted from several sources, including the rules of equity, parliamentary laws, delegated legislations, judge-made laws, and international laws. (Austrlian Legal System, 2007)
In theory all jury systems (which have existed for almost 800 years) are fair and just.
The Effectiveness of the Law in Achieving Justice for Indigenous People In relation to Australia, the term ‘Indigenous peoples’ refers to two distinct cultures of people who inhabited the land prior to European settlement – The Aboriginals and the Torres Strait Islanders. This population declined dramatically over the 19th and early 20th century due to the introduction of new diseases from European settlement, Government policies of dispersal and dispossession, the era of protection, assimilation and integration causing a cultural disruption and disintegration of the Indigenous peoples. In the 20th century the recognition and protection of Indigenous peoples land rights and human rights have been at the forefront of Global Issues where the International community has sought to address the issues and ratify Human Rights and Land Rights for Indigenous People as a legitimate subject to be implemented into international law and the domestic law of member states such as Australia. To evaluate the effectiveness of the law in achieving justice for Indigenous Australians we must look at the Australian Legal System, and the extent to which it addresses it’s obligations to International Law in relation to Australia’s
...ndigenous recognition and the removal of racist remarks has been an on-going theme for a vast majority of time. The necessity of Constitutional reform to close the gap on cultural divide as well as support the on-going concept of reconciliation is essential in ensuring Australia continues to improve and nurture its relationship with Indigenous peoples. The process of amendment through referendum has proven to be problematic in the past, with the success rate exceptionally low. Though with key factors such as bi-partisan support, widespread public knowledge and correct management, the alteration to remove racial discrimination and provide recognition for Indigenous persons within the Constitution is highly achievable. If proposed and eventually passed, this will provide assistance in eliminating many of the cultural gaps Indigenous persons face throughout society.
The merits of both the adversarial and inquisitorial system will be explored throughout this paper. The Australian rule of law best describes as all law should be applied equally and fairly. The five vital operations of the rule of law includes fairness, rationality, predictability, consistency, and impartially. The adversarial system adopts these operations by having a jury decide on the verdict and the judge being an impartial decision maker. In contrast, the inquisitorial system relies heavily on the judge. This can result in abusive power and bias of the judge when hearing evidence and delivering verdicts. The operations of the rule of law determine why the rule of law is best served by the adversarial system in Australia.
There are certain categories of legal tradition that differentiate by country or time. These legal traditions are shared by a certain groups of individuals or whole systems in and of themselves. In other words, you have to understand the legal tradition, and which legal system it is affiliated with, to understand the whole picture of how disputes and conflicts are handled. I think in our modern times, it would be challenging to find one legal system that is without influence from other legal systems (Different Legal Traditions, 2012). Legal traditions tend to incorporate different elements from other cultures and legal systems. Most legal traditions have derived from a common origins, similar institutions, and shared concepts from regarding
The term “Court Hierarchy” is a very important word in the law world in modern society. It’s definition gives a very clear and concise meaning to the law industry. The phrase can be split into two words to be easily dealt and understood. The word “court” is from a Greek derivative “cohors” or “cohort” meaning courtyard or retinue. It’s definition from the dictionary certainly portrays the law as a very important and distinguished practice. “a. A person or body of persons whose task is to hear and submit a decision on cases at law.” “b. The building, hall, or room in which such cases are heard and determined.” The word, “hierarchy”, however, has a more powerful and specific relation to the law world. It is a Greek derived word and originally came from the word “hierarkhia”, meaning the rule of a high priest. “a. A body of clergy organized into successive ranks or grades with each level subordinate to the one above.” “b. A series in which each element is graded or ranked.” By placing these two words together, it has a responsibility of giving the public a definition of one of the most important practices portrayed by the Court System of Australia. Court Hierarchy is the term given to the system in which the Courts of Australia are split into different levels to deal with different matters by different levels of severity.
Although it is required to consider the common law rule, principles and to apply settled laws to new facts. The court is also restricted by different legal doctrines of precedent, separation of powers and the court is required to make Australia laws remain predictable and certain.
The rights and freedoms achieved in Australia in the 20th and 21st century can be described as discriminating, dehumanising and unfair against the Indigenous Australians. Indigenous Australians have achieved rights and freedoms in their country since the invasion of the English Monarch in 1788 through the exploration and development of laws, referendums and processes. Firstly, this essay will discuss the effects of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights on the Indigenous Australians through dehumanising and discriminating against them. Secondly, this essay will discuss how Indigenous Australians gained citizenship and voting
The Australian Legal System has a rich and detailed history dating from 1066. Law is made in Parliament. We have four sources of law and three courts with different jurisdictions that interpret the law when giving out justice. Important doctrines act as the corner-stones of our legal system. There is a procedure in the courts for making appeals. Separation of powers exists between officials in the courts, the parliament and the Executive. Everyone in Australia is treated equally under the Rule of Law, no matter their office or status. The Law is always changing as society changes, but it can never be perfect and cannot please everyone.
With in this courtroom observation paper I will form two articles and classroom knowledge to show the relevance they play within courts today. First, local legal culture, in "court culture" concept is based on dimensions of solidarity and sociability, the intersections of which create four cultures with associated case management types: hierarchical culture (rule-oriented case management); networked culture (judicial consensus); autonomous culture (self-managing); and communal (flexible case management). The second being, court guidelines and the sentencing structure, how’s it work, and why out comes different areas that defer from Kalamazoo and Southwest Michigan as a hole.
Every nation has their own set of legal strategies they use to guide them in making important decisions. Each nation has its traditions and policies they follow. Through the world, there are two main types of legal systems that are used; most nations follow either common or civil law. Both the common law system and the civil law system share similarities in having courts, judges, and comparing cases to laws. While both systems share similarities, they also contain many differences, making them two very divergent legal systems.