Atomic Bomb Argumentative Essay

If you were told you the worlds most dangerous weapon was capable of bringing peace would you think it was crazy nonsense? The history of nuclear weapons is surprisingly short, but their ethics are extremely complex and open to debate. In discussions of the atomic bomb, one controversial issue has been of the morality of nuclear weapons. On the one hand, some argue it’s an evil tool that only brings despair and destruction in its wake. On the other hand, some contend nuclear weapons have, albeit counterintuitively, become integral to the good life because the destructive potential they carry has the power to stop wars, prevent wars, and change foreign relations.

In order to fully comprehend the concept of the atomic bomb we must first understand

It was a period of history between the USA and the USSR in which these two allies post WWII decided that the other posed a threat to what they believe is the correct way of organizing governments. They were the only huge super powers left after WWII and foreign relations between them were quite tense. Ultimately, they had very different social and political strategies; The USSR had Communism and the USA had Democracy. The two nations greatly distrusted each other, but neither wanted to engage in combat for fear of retaliation. In other words, the result would be mutually assured destruction. Proponents of a nuke free planet may want to argue that living with the fear of being attacked by these weapons is not the good life. Ultimately, the threat of war is a significantly better scenario than war itself. As David Von Drehle, of Time Magazine further

One explanation behind this is that if you have this weapon a country can not openly wage war with you without the risk of being obliterated, and when both sides have this weapon neither side wants to deal with the repercussions. They are forced to think peacefully. Breaking the rules comes with tremendous consequences as we have seen with the ramifications of Pearl Harbor. Given the right circumstances this idea of peace is quickly becoming the new standard of negotiation. As J. Robert Oppenheimer of the Manhattan Project observes, "The atomic bomb made the prospect of future war unendurable. It has led us up those last few steps to the mountain pass; and beyond there is a different country.” In other words, J. Robert Oppenheimer believes that because of the existence of nuclear weapons the world will undergo change. 651998494959555199498984984+66+662+62600 depends on how educated the general public is. In the past we have been easily swayed without being fully aware of our situations or that of the world in general. How things go forward is outside of any individuals control and takes the commitment of something far greater than any one self. ?A global understanding.? >>this is not good change