Assignment 1 “When Is “Everybody’s Doing It” A Moral Justification?” Ronald M. Green

1836 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Importance of moral decisions

Steps 1 and 2 have been completed.
Step 3: Summary
What does the “everybody’s doing it” claim actually mean?
1. People tend to bring up the “everybody’s doing it” argument when it comes to taking part in an act which is not morally right and may cause some harm to people.
2. Bribery, cheating, corruption and deception are such behaviours that can be used as examples for this claim.
3. Most of the time, this claim is only used as a form of defense mechanism when people are on the verge of receiving a punishment for this immoral behaviour.
4. The author believes that when such situations arise where a person might have the choice to make an undesirable move, you can never question the behaviour as being harmful or not. What’s immoral, is immoral.
5. There are two ways by which it can be determined whether is justified to use the “but everybody else is doing it” claim; logically dealing with a situation, and the second way is to go through the five steps of permit immoral behaviour.
The five steps that permit the enrollment of a person in immoral behaviour
6. When faced with a situation that may cause a severe loss, it is recommended to go through the five steps of the “Conditions Permitting One to Engage in Harmful but Prevalent Behaviour”.
7. The five steps state the following:
a. If not taking part in such a behaviour with cause you, or others around you harm
b. On the other hand, if by taking part in this behaviour, you will not cause a lot of harm to others
c. Ensure that your behaviour will not glorify the behaviour itself and that others will not be likely to do it themselves.
d. You taking part in this has no relation with others taking part in the same behaviour. In case the public finds out that you had been caug...

... middle of paper ...

...s and refusing to pay the bribe can lead to the shutting down of your business, it is morally justifiable to act in your own favour. (Paragraph # 24) o The situation needs to be looked at logically and after going through the “Conditions Permitting One to Engage in Harmful but Prevalent Behaviour” thoroughly. (Paragraph # 48)
- Moral Choice: o Needs to be logical, before anything else. (Paragraph # 47) o Moral choice does not only depend on the person. It also depends on the public. It is the person’s responsibility to base the choice on how it will impact society at large. (Paragraph # 8) o Knowing that your decision can encourage and empower others to refrain from taking part in immoral acts or it can result in everyone else conforming to the same immoral act. (Paragraph # 17) o Everyone has a duty to reduce and also prevent harm on others. (Paragraph # 25)

Show More
Related

  • Deontological Moral Theory

    1228 Words  | 3 Pages

    Actions are either classified as right or wrong with no allowance for a gray area. Furthermore, the strict guidelines tend to conflict with commonly accepted actions. For example, lying is always considered morally wrong--even a “white lie.” Therefore, one must not lie even if it does more good. In our society although individuals accept lying as being morally wrong, “white lies” have become an exception.

    Read More

  • Homeless Hotspots Case Study

    924 Words  | 2 Pages

    moral decisions, we will be analyzing why this scenario poses a dilemma, possible actions that

    Read More

  • Criminal Justice

    751 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...for that individual is the nation as a whole if all individual rights are observed then the rights of your public have taken care of themselves. “We can have as much or as little crime as we please; depending on what we choose to count as criminal.” Herbet L.Packer.

    Read More

  • Concept Of Vertigo

    984 Words  | 2 Pages

    Taboos are social prohibitions that create difficulties in cooperative relations. Taboss have the three parts which has a prohibition, a punishment for breaking, and protective significance. A taboo can be recognize as a specific actions, thoughts, or actions as being out of bounds, which can create a dividing line of what is acceptable and unacceptable and also have the community to restrict what they seem is appropriate to. Taboos comes with punishment for people who violates. Taboos can have the protection for guarding people from saying or performing something that can offend certain values which can be considered significant in society. Taboos can have certain obstacles that makes it difficult as the unawareness of a taboo, fears of discussing the taboo issues, not framework how to treat taboo as an issue. Navigating taboos is to be aware of the taboos, creating safe zones to conversate them, and having the decision on how to treat the taboos. Taboos have a negative reputation as how they can influence in creating conflicts; however, taboos can also solve conflicts. Taboos can provide as a social prohibitions in opposition to behavior that is causing great harm. There are constructive taboos which are to prevent aggressive behavior. There are four steps to create a constructive taboo which are (1) identify a behavior that provokes or intensify in

    Read More

  • Theories Of Deontology And Utilitarianism: Ethics And Morality

    877 Words  | 2 Pages

    More often than not, a person will encounter themselves in a difficult and problematic situation. Life is not a walk in the park when it comes to making decisions. Making choices may not be feasible when under pressure and stress. Ideally, this applies to those choices that are not black and white. In relation, this is where a person's morality comes into play which reveals their

    Read More

  • Comparing Plato's Allegory Of The Cave And Harrison Bergeron

    642 Words  | 2 Pages

    All through out history, we have had many situations that may have had good intentions but in reality would have bad consequences. Some people might think they are doing the right thing but in reality they might just be making the situation worse. For instance, we see it in Plato’s “Allegory of the Cave”, Vonnegut’s “Harrison Bergeron”, and today with “Vaping” also know as the use of an electronic cigarette.

    Read More

  • Critique of Kohlberg’s Claim of Cultural Moral Universality

    3483 Words  | 7 Pages

    All people worldwide go through the process of moral reasoning, which has been defined as "a cognitive process by which individuals make decisions about moral issues and justify these decisions, regardless of the context of the issue" (Gardiner, 1998, p.176). But not all of these people come to the s...

    Read More

  • Morality Essay

    643 Words  | 2 Pages

    In conclusion, I have argued that without a sense of accountability a connection to morality cannot be made. Wirzba’s claim holds true, and we must take into account our actions and be respectful of the requirements of the places we encounter.

    Read More

  • Propensity Essay

    1678 Words  | 4 Pages

    From time to time do individuals acknowledge negative behavior patterns are thusly destructive until wellbeing, companions, and whole families have abandoned them? Their absurd and egotistical activities need to stop for the advantage and strength of everybody. Presently considering the few stages to take out unfortunate propensities from individual lives, there are just three that are so essential. These are distinguishing the propensity, making a move with help, if necessary and being diligent. The initial step is to recognize the negative behavior pattern. In the event that

    Read More

  • Consequences Of Deviance In Society

    1408 Words  | 3 Pages

    Our society as a whole is beginning to evolve into numerous classifications. Our society branches off of the social norm structure that we have thrived from for our whole existence. Now however, people in society are going throughout their lives not always aware of the impacts that their choices and influences make on the everyday world around them. From the time people are able to grasp the concept of right and wrong until it is their turn to pass down what is right or wrong, they are not only affecting the social structure of life, but the lives of so many around them, whether they may know it or not. Although most people in society try to avoid the negative forces around them, it is now becoming an excruciating challenge to avoid the pressure and rise to a daunting task. With so many types of deviance floating around the air, it is now nearly impossible to try and not get exposed to deviance and the consequences that come with it. Deviance does not just occur in one place either. Now, it is harder than ever to not catch this behavior. It is

    Read More

  • Persuasive Essay On Appropriate Behavior

    1522 Words  | 4 Pages

    are consequences for it. We do not have a disciplined society, we need to get disciplined.

    Read More

  • Daxas Buyers Club Ethics Analysis

    1582 Words  | 4 Pages

    It is morally permissible to do an illegal act if the action is morally right and good. An action could be morally right and illegal at the same time, when it represents the lesser of two evils, or when the intentions of the person performing it are noble and have for goal to achieve his duty. An action can be morally right, but still illegal because in a situation where there is no good option, the lesser of two evils is the morally best option to do, even if it is illegal (Thomson 39). For example, in Dallas Buyers Club, Ron Woodroof acted rightly by choosing the lesser of two evils: sell illegal drugs to help AIDS patients feel better and live longer, instead of letting them suffer and die (Dallas Buyers Club). If he would have chosen to obey the law, a great number of AIDS patient would have suffered more and died of their illness, and he would have been guilty of not helping them according to the Harming by Omission Thesis (HOT) and the Equivalence of Evil Thesis (EET) (Mieth 17). These thesis affirm that omitting to help someone in need would be as bad as hurting the person directly. Thus, Woodroof acted in a morally permissible way even if he broke the law because he chose the lesser of two evils (Matheny 16). Also, someone can act justly e...

    Read More

  • Parental Decision-Making

    1533 Words  | 4 Pages

    This paper will examine this ethical dilemma further, including why it is an important issue...

    Read More

  • The Value of Religion

    1352 Words  | 3 Pages

    ...believe in, in order to make a right decision. You can just as easily know in your conscience that what you are doing is wrong, but I am just claiming that it gives you an incentive when you think that someone or something might be disappointed with you if you go on doing so.

    Read More

  • A Critical Analysis of John Stuart Mill’s "On Liberty"

    1403 Words  | 3 Pages

    Complete free exercise of will inhibits individual and societal freedom. According to Mill, one may act as one chooses unless one is inflicting harm onto others. He argues that one is free to behave “according to his own inclination and judgment in things which concern himself” as long as “he refrains from molesting” (64). The problem arises in the freedom allowed to the individual performing the potentially dangerous act. People are often blinded by the situation in which they are in and by their personal motives which drive them to act. Humans, by nature, have faults and vices that are potentially harmful. It is the responsibility of society to anticipate harm, whether to oneself or to others. Once dangerous patterns and habits are recognized it is imperative to anticipate and prevent injury from reoccurring. To allow any individual to be inflicted harm forces citizens to lose tr...

    Read More

More about Assignment 1 “When Is “Everybody’s Doing It” A Moral Justification?” Ronald M. Green

Open Document