Assess The Advantages Of Overt Observation In Sociological Research

524 Words2 Pages

Also an advantage of participant observation is that the participant’s social behaviour is seen in their natural environment so there is higher external validity. However participant observation can be seen as unethical as the sociologist has a risk of possibly misrepresenting themselves gain information if they are using covert observation, nevertheless Barker used an overt approach. However it could be argued that due to the overt experiment that participants and in this case the Moonies have a high risk of the hawthorn effect which happens ‘when subjects’ [are] awareness of their participation in an experiment [so it] affects …show more content…

Yet the use of questionnaire is slightly more reliable are they are able to be replicated due to the hard copies; however over all the methods used cause the research to be low in reliability. The practical issues are that the research methods were time consuming such as the interviews and questionnaires also, they also take a long time to analyse the data produced from these types of methods, and also the printing of the questionnaires may be very expensive. Furthermore Barkers research had high validity, due to the period of time she used her research methods throughout the study, each of methods provided evidence for the other. If only one method was used it would be harder to prove the findings, compared to all of the methods having the same findings. Yet Barkers research cannot be generalised to all religion groups as only one group was studied, so the finding are not representative and the findings cannot be generalised to the wider population. Due to Barker’s involvement with all the members for up to six years her research is theoretical because it was conducted within their own

Open Document