Articles Of Confederation Dbq

1227 Words3 Pages

After breaking the bonds of English tyranny, the newly independent United States was in need of a semi-organized government that came in the form of the Articles of Confederation. The articles called for strong and powerful state governments paired with a fragile and weak central federal government. Soon, due to the ensuing chaos, a need for a stronger central government was apparent; this loose attempt at organization lasted 8 short years and was thereafter replaced by the constitution we know today. Although the document failed, it is still taught and even used as inspiration today. The first draft was written by Benjamin Franklin in July of 1775 but was never seriously considered. After this, a delegate from Connecticut by the name of …show more content…

The raw copy of the Articles gave the states all the power and created an extremely weak central government that held almost no power. Citizens could not freely travel over state lines, each state had a unique currency, and Congress could not even tax or mobilize an army. By 1779, after a few small adjustments here and there, all states but Maryland had accepted this document. Maryland opposed the documents because the articles restricted its access to the land out west, but they were soon convinced to sign by their own, Thomas Jefferson, on the basis that the land out west would be divided into additional separate states (History.com Staff); all states signed the final copy in March of 1781 (Library of Congress). Luckily after a few more ratifications, the final copy of the articles was released and contained a few changes, such as calling for a unicameral congress with each state retaining one vote and also, federal representatives were elected by each state government. Although revised, the articles still mainly focused on state sovereignty and states retained the most power and freedom. Congress still did not havethe power to levy taxes or even regulate commerce. On the other hand, in this copy, Congress did hold the power to make treaties as well as coin money and maintain an army and navy. Shortly after the Articles were accepted by all states, problems …show more content…

The plan for a group of independent states with a weak central government was ultimately a mess. Many controversies surrounded these early thoughts for a government, such as the lack of money to pay those who fought the war as well as managing foreign affairs. Additionally, these papers assumed that people could effectively govern themselves. They gave all the power to the people and expected it to go just as they had planned. If history has taught us anything, it is that nothing goes as planned when it comes to governing people. The Articles also assumed that a central government was not as important as a state government and that it was not fully necessary. They failed to realize that a central government is key in uniting the nation as well as providing a national income as well as defending members of the nation. These two false assumptions proved to be the downfall of this document, but the beginnings for a new and better

Open Document