Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of environment in the development of children essay
The nature/nurture debate explained
The nature/nurture debate explained
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
doption Behavior Has society ever stopped to think that behavior is caused by the way a child’s parent act, what kind of environment they were born in and the way they were raised growing up? According to Sarah Mae Sincero, “the nature verses nurture debate is one of the oldest debates in the world” (Sincero). She says, that “nature is the coding of genes that make up features like eyes and hair color. Nurture is the way someone acts because of the genetic influences the child has” (Sincero). Sarah makes many good points in her article, but behavior in children is not necessarily because of the genetic influences. Bad behavior can be caused by the environment the child is surrounded by. Think about this, if a child lived in poverty, but later …show more content…
When she does not get what she wants, she kills the people that do not give it to her. She was never taught that people cannot have everything they want in life. This behavior is because of the way she was raised. Rhoda’s parents were what seemed to be normal parents. The only problem being is that her father was gone for periods at a time for his job. This left Rhoda, at times, with only female supervision. Her mother was quite capable of raising Rhoda by herself, but every child needs both parents present to be taught to have respectable behavior. Rhoda was never taught right from wrong. She was a child that got almost everything she asked for but when she did not receive it, she would turn into a child with extremely bad behavior. If her father and mother would have corrected this behavioral issue earlier on maybe Rhoda would have ended up acting differently. Behavior issues have everything to do with the environment that a child grew up in. Genetic influences have nothing to do with a child’s behavior. Readers can take this into recognition here because of the way the parents act. Rhoda’s parents are loving and caring. It was the way that they taught and influenced Rhoda that made her who she is today
As an adolescent, there were countless times that I disagreed with my parents. Ninety-Nine percent of the time I argued with my parents, just for the sake of an argument. I know that after almost every argument I can remember muttering to myself, that I will never treat my kids as my parents did. To fulfill this teenage fantasy I will need to overcome two giant hurdles. First, my nature or genetic makeup comes from my parents. Also, the environment that I’m raised in or nurtured in is solely with my parents. In the following, I will discuss my views on how nature and nurture both contribute to who I am.
nurture argument. Theorists have wondered how much of development is affected by genetics and the environment. Ultimately, nature and nurture intertwine to shape the lives of children. Nature may predispose children to certain behaviors if placed in specific environments, however the timing of the environmental exposure and the child’s natural tendencies also play a role. Theorists have also discussed the extent to which development is universal and how much of it is unique to individuals. There are consistencies that have been noted universally yet; theorists have observed variations in their competency in different tasks and way of life that may be contributed to genetics or the environment. Lastly, theorists debate about whether changes in development can be portrayed as qualitative where it involves dramatic changes or quantitative in which development is a steady progression. These debates have merits independently but require each other for a better understanding of child
Nature versus nurture is one of the oldest and most studied debates in the history of psychology. This debate is about an individual’s genetic influences as opposed to the environmental influences on physical characteristics and intelligence (Rathus 197). Some think that genes determine an individual’s development and others think that it comes from how one was raised. My development was influenced by nature and nurture equally because I would not be myself if I did not get my ambition from my mother and my manners from my upbringing.
Nature vs. nurture has been one of the oldest and most debated topics among psychologists over the years. This concept discusses whether a child is born into this world with their developmental work cut out for them or if a child is a “blank slate” and their experiences are what shape them into who they are. Over the years and plenty of research, psychologists have all mostly come to agree that it’s a little bit of both. Children are both born with some genetic predispositions while other aspects of the child’s development are strongly influenced by their surrounding environment. This plays into the criminal justice system when discussing where criminal behavior stems from. Is a criminal’s anti-social behavior just part of their DNA or is it a result of their upbringing? The answer to this question is not definite. Looking at research a strong argument can be made that criminals developed their anti-social patterns through the atmosphere in which they were raise, not their DNA.
Scientists make a good point about genes but I believe physical aspects come through genetics, but that personality development is shaped based solely on how a person has been nurtured through their lives. All children are bad at one time in their lives; consider this, a 4 year old girl throws a book at her brother, and is punished she is put in the corner.
“The term “nature versus nurture” is used to refer to a long-running scientific debate. The source of debate is the question of which has a greater influence on development: someone's innate characteristics provided by genetics, or someone's environment. In fact, the nature versus nurture debate has been largely termed obsolete by many researchers, because both innate characteristics and environment play a huge role in development, and they often intersect”. (Smith, 2010 p. 1)
Nora’s life struggle began at a young age. Her father treated her like an inhuman object, and now her husband has done the same thing. After many years of maintaining her “perfect” life, Nora could no longer live like this. She finally stands up for herself and makes a choice to leave her family. This decision is completely reasonable. It is unimaginable to think anyone could treat another person so crudely. No person should be molded into being someone they are not. It is unfair to treat a loved one like an object instead of an equal human being. Unfortunately there are many women today who find themselves in the same position in Nora. Many of which do not have the strength to confront, and to pry themselves from grips of their abusers. It is possible that the greatest miracle will be Nora, out on her own, finding her true self.
As nature can not be changed, nurture can be changed. Nurture is the only effective instrument that humans can manipulate. Nurture is also able to create problems that nature has never reached, it is able to greatly influence how the individual will turn out with the varying conditions. On the other hand nature varies very little in the genome at a time. In the book Nature Via Nurture by Matt Ridley, a famous british scientific journalist, Ridley says that although nature plays a role nurture plays a huge role in determining the actions of an individual. On the website “http://www.personal.psu.edu/” the website of the State Pennsylvania, the psychology department has argued that many of the serial killers are known to have abusive history with their parents and a roughed up childhood. With these many sources, it was clear to conclude that nurture is one of the more prominent factors in shaping a serial killer. Therefore, nurture is the major influence and the main factor when it comes to shaping up a possible serial killer, when raised under the best conditions, any possible serial killers will never be able to become a serial
Human behavior is a loosely defined foundation for individuality, generally considered to be influenced and developed by the environment. However, recent molecular studies have exposed genetic factors that suggest a more biological origin for behavior. Gene segments in the genome of humans and other animals have been identified and associated with particular behavioral traits. Is it possible that the presence or absence of even a single gene may predispose one to alcoholism, increased irritability, or enhanced intelligence? Clearly exploration of the nature versus nurture argument with regard to genetic predisposition has social, political, and legal significance.
In particular, the integration of passive and evocative genotypes along with environmental impacts had a significant effect on the way I raised my child, as well as the child’s response to my parenting practices. Passive genotypes are based on the concept that biological parents provide both genes and specific environments for children that reinforce those genes (Arnett, 2016), making it impossible to separate the two into disparate influences. For example, my child had always been an avid reader and was considerably advanced in her language and socialization skills, which as a characteristic, was likely inherited from me. This genetic inclination toward reading was then reinforced and strengthened by an environment that I had indirectly provided that included a large aspect of literature and an extensive use of language. An evocative genotype as described by Arnett (2016), occurs when the child has acquired a particular skillset or characteristic, which in turn evokes a particular response in the parent. As my virtual child began demonstrating strength in athletics, and was acquiring skills such as obedience and cooperation through her sports teams, my response as a parent was to encourage this behavior, and provide an environment with easy accessibility to physical activity and sports. This in turn had a significant effect on the amount of socialization my child was exposed to, and influenced my child to later become more concerned with the interests and opinions of others, along with her social status as compared with her
Nature by itself can affect a child’s development. If the child is born with a disease or mental illness, they may develop at a slower pace. For example, if a child is born with Asperger’s syndrome, the child will have a difficult time with social skills and understanding emotions. Nurture deals with the environment. If a child was raised in a hostile environment, that child is more likely to be hostile when they get older. Environment may play a larger role in most cases due to everyday lifestyle, from the city you live in to the way you are raised. If one was raised in a healthy house hold, someone who lived in a toxic household may behave differently.
Nature vs. nurture has been discussed by philosophers in the past and by scientists more recently. Philosophers such as Plato argued that all knowledge was inherited from your parents and when you were told something you didn’t learn it you were just reminded of it. Aristotle however argued that all humans were born with a blank slate and built on it with influence from there environment. In the 1700’s the empiricists and the internalists took over the argument. They fought through letters explaining there point of views and denouncing the others. This leads to Pavlov coming up with the idea of behaviorism in the early 1900‘s. Behaviorism became the new wave of Psychology and influenced a lean towards the nurture side. It was not effectively argued against until 1928 when Watson published his book. This opened up the floodgates for environmental influences studies. Soon the idea of nurture was the popular excuse for behavior. Studies using animals were the most popular was in which scientists used to prove a theory, or disprove a theory. The newest studies use human twins to prove nature vs. nurture.
In order for a seed to germinate, many conditions must be met. Firstly a seed must be viable. If a seed is viable it require a suitable environment with proper levels of moisture, suitable temperatures, oxygen, fertile soil, and proper pH levels to name a few. However, as many of us have experienced, some viable (living) seeds will NOT germinate, even when given the perfect conditions. In the field of botany, this phenomenon is known as “physiological seed dormancy” (will be referred to as PSD from here on out). In plain language, PSD is like a “hibernation” stage that occurs after seed maturation but before germination.
It has been popular to attribute deviant behaviour to a single cause or factor, such as physical, psychological, environmental etc. There are many different inside influences that are believed to affect the way a child acts both negatively and positively, some of which are as follows : -
Nature versus nurture is a long question of whether genetics influence environmental or environmental influences, genetics (Myers, 2014). While we are all born with 20,000 to 25,000 genes there are some that are dormant and some active; believed that environmental influences effect which stay dormant and which become active (Myers, 2014). Throughout Bandura’s experiment, we can see that while some children already seem exposed to elements to awaken the genes for anger and aggression. While others seem to repeat what they saw the adult do, but not with as much force and