Arthur Bentley's Conflict Of Interest

802 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Direct democracy and representative democracy

In Conflict of Interest, the author described Arthur Bentley’s views on politics and government as being the result of action taken by groups. Bentley argued that there was no such thing as the public, only factions of like minded people. This contrasts with the Declaration of Independence with grouped all of the colonists together by speaking for all of them using “We the people…”. The Declaration of Independence can be related to the article on Brexit since in both, people came together regardless of their groups and made a decision collectively. However, while the Declaration o independence is used as a promotion for democracy, Brexit possess a warning of the dangers of allowing the misinformed public to participate in direct democracy. …show more content…

I had always agreed with the idea of “the common good” or what is “good for the public”. Now, it makes more sense to me to see the public as groups of like minded people, since there is nothing that could be good for every single group. Before reading Destabilizing the American Racial Order, I was already aware of the fact that the people of my generation see race differently than people from generations past. I found it interesting that the author said that different races would be moving into the “most disfavored” category due to changing perceptions of different races. While reading Multiculturalism and Civil Rights in the Future, I wondered if racial categorization will become obsolete in the future when the lines between races are so blurred that they are indistinct. I also wondered how this would impact people’s self identification in the future. I was not surprised to find that Brexit’s Lessons for Democracy had a cautionary tone. I found myself questioning the reasoning behind using direct democracy to decide such important issues. I agree with the author in that too much direct democracy can be a bad thing. After reading these works, I felt like I was able to look at The Declaration of Independence with a more critical eye. I found it to be almost hypocritical that the colonists talked about self evident rights and equality when the only people with those rights were white, property-owning

Show More
Related

  • Ronald Kaki's A Different Mirror By Ronald Takaki

    1069 Words  | 3 Pages

    Since they lacked certain physical and/or cultural characteristics needed to belong in the American nation, they were not considered worthy enough to receive the same rights and privileges they deserve. Therefore, Takaki hopes that with his book, people would acknowledge how America developed a society centered to benefit only white people with the creation of laws hindering these racial groups from receiving the same and equal rights they deserve.

    Read More

  • Race: A Philosophical Introduction by Paul Taylor

    1345 Words  | 3 Pages

    Race-thinking: what is it? Isn’t the world past the issue of race? Do races even exist and if so, what does it mean to have a racial identity? Is colorblindness possible and how important is it? These are the questions Paul Taylor addresses in the book “Race: A Philosophical Introduction”. Paul Taylor is a self-proclaimed “radical constructionist” who will maintain that race is very real in our world and in the United States as a whole (p. 80). Taylor takes care to ensure he addresses the real needs concerning racial dynamics in the U.S., referencing historical events, prevailing policy affairs, and even pop culture to explain that everyone capable of forming opinions ought to have some sort of grasp of the concept of race-thinking. As Taylor will analyze, race and race-thinking “has shaped and continues to shape private interactions as well as the largest political choices” (p. 8). In other words, race-thinking encompasses everything we do and every interaction we have. In this paper I will attempt to interpret and expound Taylor’s views and definitions of race, concepts associated with race, and input my own interpretations as they are appropriate.

    Read More

  • James Madison's View of Factionalism

    1339 Words  | 3 Pages

    The dangers of faction can somewhat outweigh the good. The framers of the American Constitution feared the power that could possibly come about by organized interest groups. Madison wrote "The public good is disregarded in the conflict of rival factions…citizens…who are united and actuated by some common impulse of passion, or of interest, adverse to the rights of other citizens, or to the permanent and aggregate interests of the community." However, the framers believed that interest groups thrived because of freedom, the same privilege that Americans utilize to express their views. Madison saw direct democracy as a danger to individual rights and advocated a representative democracy to protect individual liberty, and the general public from the effects of such inequality in society. Madison says "A pure democracy can admit no cure for the mischief's of faction. A common passion or interest will be felt by a majority…Hence it is, that democracies have ever been found incompatible with personal security or the rights of property; and have, in general, been as short in their lives as they have been violent in their deaths."

    Read More

  • Myths of the Melting Pot

    1981 Words  | 4 Pages

    concerns racial equality in America. The myth of the “Melting Pot” is a farce within American society, which hinders Americans from facing societal equality issues at hand. Only when America decides to face the truth, that society is not equal, and delve into the reasons why such equality is a dream instead of reality. Will society be able to tackle suc...

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Michael Omi And Winant's Racial Formation

    722 Words  | 2 Pages

    There is a specific meaning to race and how its role impacts society and shapes the social structures. Race is a concept that “symbolizes social conflicts and interests by referring to different types of human bodies” (Omi & Winant 55). In other words, Omi and Winant get down to the crux of the issue and assert that race is just an illusion. Race is merely seen as an ideological construct that is often unstable and consisting of decentered social meanings. This form of social construction attempts to explain the physical attributes of an individual but it is constantly transformed by political struggles. The rules of classifying race and of identity are embedded into society’s perception. Therefore, race becomes a common function for comprehending, explaining, and acting in the

    Read More

  • SHORT STORY : THE FREEDMEN ‘S BUREAU

    803 Words  | 2 Pages

    war. The challenge of establishing a new social order founded on freedom and racial equality

    Read More

  • An American Dilemma Analysis

    1647 Words  | 4 Pages

    Taylor wrote about the “Racial Privacy Initiative” that some Californians were trying to get on the ballots in November 2002. This political proposal stated “By re-emphasizing America’s checkered racial history, race classifications focus our attention on what divides us, rather than what unites us. If we are to solve the educational, social and economic problems of tomorrow, we must unite our hearts and minds pursuing common goals. As long as we keep counting by skin color, we can never become “one nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.” Paul Taylor Race Taylor ascertains in his book that racism can be birthed out of any kind of race-thinking, it also clarified the false thinking of racial biology and that race is nothing but differences of class divisions. Race continues to have a place in our conversation; some may see it as just mere words to speak at the right time and in the right place, but race-thinking seems to live in its own little world, non-related to any ill will to anyone. It is as if it is only connected to the failure to restrict the quest for profit and to emphasize justice and civility with regards to political authority. Taylor also speaks to how racist ideology and practices can certainly bring about results that can focus on one race and bring about economic hardship to that specific group. Taylor said

    Read More

  • Social Construction Of Race

    733 Words  | 2 Pages

    In order for one to understand how racism has come to be what we know it as today, we must first examine the Constitution of the United States. This document clearly states, “We the People of the United States.” The question proposed from this statement is, who exactly are “the People?” The constitution deemed that only free people were considered whole, and ultimately they were the ones the Constitution reflected most positively upon. The rest of the population was considered to be three fifths of a human being. That could be and in fact was interpreted by saying non-free people were only three fifths as important as a property owning white males. In addition to the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence also posed many questions of racism. The Declaration of Independence was written to sever ties in which people were denied their unalienable rights. However, the Constitution was still denying several people of their...

    Read More

  • Political Rhetorical Analysis

    501 Words  | 2 Pages

    Of course, the actions of bureaucracy are not enough to drive the idea within us that racial divisions are omnipresent. Even as we acknowledge that our government has driven the ideas of racial harmony since our founding days, the golden question is whether we the people have arrived at a junction where we no longer need a higher authority to remind us, that we are fully aware and ready for a nation that is united on the common hopes and dreams that we

    Read More

  • Discrimination and Liberty

    1198 Words  | 3 Pages

    While many of us, including me, find some aspects of racial discrimination morally repulsive, we must at the same time recognize that freedom of association should be our overreaching value. Valuing freedom of association does not mean that we are helpless in registering revulsion to various forms of discrimination. There are private social sanctions that can be exercised similar to those exercised when people behave impolitely, use vulgar language, or disrespect elders. But the largest contribution to racial harmony is for us to keep government limited to its legitimate or moral functions; namely, preventing force, fraud, theft and initiation of violence.

    Read More

  • The Arguments of Thomas Paine and James Chalmers Over the Revolutionary War

    735 Words  | 2 Pages

    In conclusion, without struggle and without sacrifice this country would not have gained the independence and prove that united we stand and divide we fall. Thomas Paine quite elegantly put it “however strange it may appear to some, or however unwilling they may be to think so, matters not, but many strong and striking reasons may be given to shew, that nothing can settle our affairs so expeditiously as an open and determined declaration of independence” (Paine 111).

    Read More

  • The Social Construction Of Race

    1097 Words  | 3 Pages

    To understand our existence, we interact with other members of society and develop a set of shared notions, institutions, and structures. Sociology, the systematic study of human society, helps us understand these interactions and developments. In particular, applying the sociological imagination to the social construct of race yields insight into its fallacy and utility. This essay examines the historical origin, functions, and societal implications of race in the United States. I also connect the social construct of race with the writings of Barbara J. Fields, Kingsley Davis, Wilbert E. Moore, Marianne Bertrand, and Sendhil Mullainathan. In a larger context, the social construct of race is a system of schematic classification; race

    Read More

  • Racial Formation Essay

    1303 Words  | 3 Pages

    That is where we see that the state and government have enormous power when it comes to defining what race actually is. The state can fundamentally shape your social status within their means. They have all access to one’s economic opportunities, including employment, and they also can control your political rights. The government pretty much has control of how you look and define yourself, but more importantly the control how others will define you. The state controls medical and research facilities and can influence all that fall under these categories, creating things such as race based

    Read More

  • Life Will Never Be the Same

    856 Words  | 2 Pages

    Will we ever let the past stay behind us and move forward? In today’s era, is it the peoples’ responsibility to defend the history of their race just because of the color of their skin? Based on the color of our skin, individuals will always be placed and categorized under a certain race. In the essay “Race, Culture, Identity: Misunderstood Connections” by Kwame Anthony Appiah, he tries to explains why race doesn’t exist and the only race in America is the human race. In “Social Identity and Group Solidarity” by Tommie Shelby, he discusses how in America, blacks are looked as one group even though are different cultures amongst Blacks. Even though in today’s world, people of all races get along just well with each other, but there are still signs of racism and discrimination that haunt us from the slavery era years ago as African Americans. People tend to easily find their identity because they base other people off of their race, ethnicity, living conditions, religion and more. Appiah and Shelby both connect on the idea of Cultural diversity dealing with “race” because Appiah argues whether that race actually exists and Shelby talks about black solidarity being separated and affected because of self-determination and equality.

    Read More

  • Segregation In Society: Has Society Really Been Desegregated?

    769 Words  | 2 Pages

    Throughout the 20th century people like Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and many other advocates of desegregation in society have stood for the togetherness of all races. In society, depending on who he or she is, he or she may tell you that segregation doesn’t exist anymore and that our society is heading in the right direction. He or she may be right to a certain extent, but take a moment and think about whom your main group of friends is, what type of people reflects your religious settings, and what cultural background reflects the main group of people at your work place. Our society may seem right but has totally reversed in terms of cultural diversity in every aspect of our lives. Every race is categorized for being and doing something that may seem to help or hinder society. From where I grew up in society, the world portrayed to me to

    Read More

More about Arthur Bentley's Conflict Of Interest

Open Document